| 
 Israel has Never had a Democracy, So how Can it 
		Lose it?  By Nasim Ahmed February 26, 2023  |  | 
		
		
			
				|  |  | 
			
				| Israeli anti-government protests, February 25, 2023 |  | 
		
		 
		What should we make of the daily warnings issued about democracy 
		being in peril in Israel? 
		Over the weekend it was US Ambassador to Israel Tom Nides who sounded 
		the alarm. "What unites America and Israel is the love of democracy and 
		democratic institutions," said Nides while calling on the far-right 
		government led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to delay its planned 
		legislation to overhaul the judicial system. "This is what makes us 
		defend Israel time and again." He was speaking a day before the Knesset 
		— Israel's parliament — passed the draft legislation on its first 
		reading in the very early hours of Monday morning, with 63 MKs in favour, 
		a simple majority in the 120-seat chamber.
Nides joins a long 
		list of people and thousands of protestors warning about the death of 
		democracy in Israel. They include Israel's former attorneys general and 
		ex-state prosecutors who published a letter warning that Netanyahu's 
		proposal imperils efforts to "preserve Israel as a Jewish and democratic 
		state." Perhaps the most alarming remarks were those made by Professor 
		Daniel Blatman at the Institute for Contemporary Jewry at the Hebrew 
		University, who said that fascism is "already there" in Israel. Liberal 
		Jewish organizations on both sides of the Atlantic have also expressed 
		their concerns about the government's plan for judicial "reforms".
		
The vote on the contentious legislation has been described as "a 
		battle over Israel's essence." Bills tabled will amend Israel's "basic 
		laws", which are the legal equivalent to a constitution. The changes 
		will grant lawmakers control over judicial appointments, eliminate 
		judicial review of legislation and allow parliament to vote down Supreme 
		Court decisions. In practice, this means that the most extreme far-right 
		regime in Israel's history will control the judiciary to an 
		extraordinary degree. In the Israeli political system, where the 
		government always enjoys a majority, such an overhaul eliminates the 
		independence of the three main branches of a democratic system: the 
		legislature, the executive and the judiciary.
Yesterday's vote 
		triggered further warnings about the threat to democracy. "Members of 
		the coalition — history will judge you for this night," the leader of 
		the opposition, Yair Lapid, said on Twitter. "For the damage to 
		democracy, for the damage to the economy, for the damage to security, 
		for the fact that you are tearing the people of Israel apart and you 
		simply do not care."
It is tempting to view this kind of judicial 
		reform in Israel as just another example of democracy being in retreat 
		across the globe. Moreover, the likes of Lapid, Nides and countless 
		others who are critical of the Israeli government would like nothing 
		more than for the rest of world to believe that the attack on democracy 
		by the Netanyahu government is just an aberration. To prove their claim, 
		they may even cite last year's report by The Global State of Democracy 
		which found that half of democratic governments around the world are in 
		decline while authoritarian regimes are deepening their repression. 
		While there is perhaps some truth to this claim, it ignores completely 
		the historical tension between democracy and Zionism at the heart of 
		Israeli politics.
For millions of Palestinians and many more who 
		are familiar with the nature of Israel's ongoing ethnic cleansing and 
		takeover of the land of Palestine, the warning and outrage over 
		democracy being under siege from a far-right faction in the Knesset is 
		mystifying. In their eyes, Israel is far from being a democracy. A core 
		principal of democracy is the idea that the state belongs to all of its 
		citizens. Israel, though, is the self-declared "nation state of the 
		Jewish people". This has profound implications. It means that a Jew 
		living anywhere in the world with no connection to Israel whatsoever has 
		a greater claim to the land than non-Jewish citizens of the occupation 
		state, who make up 20 per cent of the population. By downgrading 
		citizenship in favor of one specific ethnic group, Israel undermines a 
		fundamental principal of democracy and encodes discrimination into its 
		basic laws.
While 20 per cent of Israeli citizens face various 
		forms of institutionalized discrimination, the apartheid state's 
		treatment of non-Jews in the occupied West Bank and Gaza is as far from 
		democratic as the white supremacist apartheid regime in South Africa 
		was. The Pretoria government established ten "Bantustans" to house 
		ethnically homogeneous groups. The aim was to establish autonomous 
		nation states for South Africa's black communities, but no one was under 
		the illusion that this was anything but part of the apartheid system. 
		Israel, by the way, maintained a very close relationship with the 
		apartheid regime in South Africa.
Today, Israel has created 
		"self-governing" authorities inside the occupied Palestinian 
		territories. Almost every Israeli politician, including those bemoaning 
		the death of democracy in the occupation state, is in full support of 
		such an arrangement which for decades has locked Palestinians into 
		various zones of subjugation and control. There is nothing to suggest 
		that the seven million Palestinians ruled by Israel will ever be granted 
		the same rights as the seven million Jews who also live in historic 
		Palestine.
Palestinians don't believe that Israel is a democracy. 
		Nor do they believe that the Israeli Supreme Court is in danger of 
		losing its independence if Netanyahu's reforms get through their second 
		and third readings, which is likely. The simple reason for this is that 
		the court has never displayed any independence. Israeli judges have 
		rubber-stamped almost every policy and piece of legislation designed to 
		preserve and maintain the apartheid system and Jewish supremacy in 
		occupied Palestine. That's why the Palestinians know better than anyone 
		that the idea of a "Jewish democracy" is an oxymoron.
They have 
		also discovered that every Israeli government will choose the Zionist 
		ideal of Jewish supremacy over democracy; racial and racist 
		discrimination over equality. The "Jewish state" has no democracy to 
		lose.
- Nasim Ahmed is a political analyst. 
		He publishes articles on a daily basis with the London-based Middle East 
		Monitor (MEMO) focusing in particular on Israel and Palestine and the 
		Gulf region.
		
		
		Israel has never had a democracy, so how can it lose it? (palinfo.com) 
		***