www.aljazeerah.info
Opinion Editorials, January 2015
Archives
Mission & Name
Conflict Terminology
Editorials
Gaza Holocaust
Gulf War
Isdood
Islam
News
News Photos
Opinion Editorials
US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)
www.aljazeerah.info
Charlie Hebdo Affair Has Many of the Characteristics of a False Flag Operation
By Paul Craig Roberts and Alex James
Al-Jazeerah, CCUN, January 15, 2015
 |
CHARLIE HEBDO
The Charlie Hebdo affair has many of the characteristics of a false flag operation, writes Dr. Paul Craig Roberts.
The Charlie Hebdo affair has many of the
characteristics of a false flag operation. The attack on the cartoonists’
office was a disciplined professional attack of the kind associated with
highly trained special forces; yet the suspects who were later corralled and
killed seemed bumbling and unprofessional. It is like two different sets of
people.
Usually Muslim terrorists are prepared to die in the attack; yet the two
professionals who hit Charlie Hebdo were determined to escape and succeeded,
an amazing feat. Their identity was allegedly established by the claim that
they conveniently left for the authorities their ID in the getaway car. Such
a mistake is inconsistent with the professionalism of the attack and reminds
me of the undamaged passport found miraculously among the ruins of the two
WTC towers that served to establish the identity of the alleged 9/11
hijackers.
It is a plausible inference that the ID left
behind in the getaway car was the ID of the two Kouachi brothers, convenient
patsies, later killed by police, and from whom we will never hear anything,
and not the ID of the professionals who attacked Charlie Hebdo. An important
fact that supports this inference is the report that the third suspect in
the attack, Hamyd Mourad, the alleged driver of the getaway car, when seeing
his name circulating on social media as a suspect realized the danger he was
in and quickly turned himself into the police for protection against being
murdered by security forces as a terrorist.
Hamyd Mourad - the despoiler?
Hamyd
Mourad says he has an iron-clad alibi. If so, this makes him the despoiler
of a false flag attack. Authorities will have to say that despite being
wrong about Mourad, they were right about the Kouachi brothers.
Alternatively, Mourad could be coerced or tortured into some sort of
confession that supports the official story.
The
American and European media have ignored the fact that Mourad turned himself
in for protection from being killed as a terrorist as he has an alibi. I
googled Hamid Mourad and all I found (January 12) was the main US and
European media reporting that the third suspect had turned himself in. The
reason for his surrender was left out of the reports. The news was reported
in a way that gave credence to the accusation that the suspect who turned
himself in was part of the attack on Charlie Hebdo. Not a single US
mainstream media source reported that the alleged suspect turned himself in
because he has an ironclad alibi.
Some media merely reported Mourad’s surrender
in a headline with no coverage in the report. The list that I googled
includes the Washington Post (January 7 by Griff Witte and Anthony Faiola);
Die Welt (Germany) “One suspect has turned himself in to police in
connection with Wednesday’s massacre at the offices of Parisian satirical
magazine, Charlie Hebdo;” ABC News (January 7) “Youngest suspect in Charlie
Hebdo Attack turns himself in;” CNN (January 8) “Citing sources, the Agence
France Presse news agency reported that an 18-year-old suspect in the attack
had surrendered to police.”Another puzzle in the official story that remains
unreported by the presstitute media is the alleged suicide of a high ranking
member of the French Judicial Police who had an important role in the
Charlie Hebdo investigation. For unknown reasons, Helric Fredou, a police
official involved in the most important investigation of a lifetime, decided
to kill himself in his police office on January 7 or January 8 (both dates
are reported in the foreign media) in the middle of the night while writing
his report on his investigation. A google search as of 6pm EST January 13
turns up no mainstream US media report of this event. The alternative media
reports it, as do some UK newspapers, but without suspicion or mention
whether his report has disappeared. The official story is that Fredou was
suffering from “depression” and “burnout,” but no evidence is provided.
Depression and burnout are the standard explanations of mysterious deaths
that have unsettling implications.
US media - ministry of
propaganda for Washington
Once
again we see the US print and TV media serving as a ministry of propaganda
for Washington. In place of investigation, the media repeats the
government’s implausible story.
It
behoves us all to think. Why would Muslims be more outraged by cartoons in a
Paris magazine than by hundreds of thousands of Muslims killed by Washington
and its French and NATO vassals in seven countries during the past 14 years?
If
Muslims wanted to make a point of the cartoons, why not bring a hate crime
charge or lawsuit? Imagine what would happen to a European magazine that
dared to satirize Jews in the way Charlie Hebdo satirized Muslims. Indeed,
in Europe people are imprisoned for investigating the holocaust without
entirely confirming every aspect of it.
If a
Muslim lawsuit was deep-sixed by French authorities, the Muslims would have
made their point. Killing people merely contributes to the demonization of
Muslims, a result that only serves Washington’s wars against Muslim
countries.
If
Muslims are responsible for the attack on Charlie Hebdo, what Muslim goal
did they achieve? None whatsoever. Indeed, the attack attributed to Muslims
has ended French and European sympathy and support for Palestine and
European opposition to more US wars against Muslims. Just recently France
had voted in the UN with Palestine against the US-Israeli position. This
assertion of an independent French foreign policy was reinforced by the
recent statement by the President of France that the economic sanctions
against Russia should be terminated.
Clearly, France was showing too much foreign policy independence. The attack
on Charlie Hebdo serves to cow France and place France back under
Washington’s thumb.
9/11
Some will
contend that Muslims are sufficiently stupid to shoot themselves in the head
in this way. But how do we reconcile such alleged stupidity with the alleged
Muslim 9/11 and Charlie Hebdo professional attacks?
If we
believe the official story, the 9/11 attack on the US shows that 19 Muslims,
largely Saudis, without any government or intelligence service support,
outwitted not only all 16 US intelligence agencies, the National Security
Council, Dick Cheney and all the neoconservatives in high positions
throughout the US government, and airport security, but also the
intelligence services of NATO and Israel’s Mossad. How can such intelligent
and capable people, who delivered the most humiliating blow in world history
to an alleged Superpower with no difficulty whatsoever despite giving every
indication of their intentions, possibly be so stupid as to shoot themselves
in the head when they could have thrown France into turmoil with a mere
lawsuit?
The
Charlie Hebdo story simply doesn’t wash. If you believe it, you are no match
for a Muslim.
Some
who think that they are experts will say that a false flag attack in France
would be impossible without the cooperation of French intelligence. To this
I say that it is practically a certainty that the CIA has more control over
French intelligence than does the President of France. Operation Gladio
proves this. The largest part of the government of Italy was ignorant of the
bombings conducted by the CIA and Italian Intelligence against European
women and children and blamed on communists in order to diminish the
communist vote in elections.
Americans are a pitifully misinformed people. All of history is a history of
false flag operations. Yet Americans dismiss such proven operations as
“conspiracy theories,” which merely proves that government has successfully
brainwashed insouciant Americans and deprived them of the ability to
recognize the truth.
Americans are the foremost
among the captive nations.
Who
will liberate them?
http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2015/01/13/charlie-hebdo-paul-craig-roberts/
This article originally appeared on paulcraigroberts.org.
============================================================================
Prepared by Alex James
False
Flag Is So Common … There’s a Name for It. It was given 100 years ago.
Painting
by
Anthony Freda (see examples of other false flags at the end)
Just as in all false flag operations such as 9/11, 7/7, etc., the Paris
staged false flag is psy-op to create fear and generate anti-Islam
propaganda to deflect attention from the Western Elites’ financial and
political power games and turn public opinion in favour of the Zionist
state.
1.
Charlie Hebdo has reportedly made fun of the Mossad agent Abu Bakr
al-Baghdadi whose real name is Simon Elliot and who poses as the leader of
ISIS. However, cartoonists who were exposing Zionist crimes were fired from
their jobs and Charlie Hebdo was about to go bankrupt.
2.
French MPs voted in favour of a Palestinian state days before the attacks.
Netanyahu said, back in November that France was going to commit a Grave
Mistake if they were to recognize a Palestinian State.
3.
France voted against Israel at the UN.
4.
Unequivocal Warning To France
http://stateofthenation2012.com/?p=9864 because France declared an end
to the Russian sanctions just two days before the terror attacks. France was
leading the chorus of European voices wanting to back out of the US war
agenda? Israelies have taken control of the Ukraine government and are after
Russian wealth now. (remember shortly after 9/11 when Mexico didn’t want to
join in the war on terror, Mossad sent its goons to blow up the Mexican
Parliament using fake passports. They were caught and after intervention by
their Israeli ambassador, they were sent back to Israel).
5.
Manufacture a defeatist opinion towards Islam or a public longing for the
NWO promises of peace after the next WW3.
6.
Steam-up strong public emotions towards whatever direction the Zionists want
such as continuous killing of Palestinians, Syrians, Iraqis, Lebanese,
Libyans, etc. and destruction of their homes, farms, etc. while recruiting
European Jews to flee to Israel.
7.
It
will be easy for Zionists to destroy the Al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem without
being condemned since the Zionists are ratcheting up their propaganda
against Islam and muslims with their usual false flag and lies.
However, some good people are exposing both the Paris false flag operation
and its ensuing propaganda.
"I
was born Christian. If that makes Rupert Murdoch my responsibility, I'll
auto-excommunicate. The Spanish Inquisition was my fault, as is all
Christian fundamentalist violence. Oh, and Jim Bakker." — J.K. Rowling,
in response to this tweet:
https://twitter.com/rupertmurdoch/status/553734788881076225
Jewish lady Dhalia Wasfi exposes US/Israel war crimes:
http://youtu.be/duLPbu8ZYmk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zB9_EgiylOk
Smoking Gun Video Proves Paris Attack was Fake and done in two takes!
Case Closed!
Amchai Stein, the deputy editor of Israeli IBA Channel 1, just happened to
be at the scene and has been posting photos of the shooting. We can see
below that they are staged.
http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=paris+attack+video+hoax
Watch the video that Google has been removing because it has evidence that
the attack was a false flag staged operation:
http://stormcloudsgathering.com/charlie-hebdo-shootings-censored-video
The above evidence sheds doubt on the official story regarding the Charlie
Hebdo shootings.
.
Friday, 9 January 2015
PARIS PSYOP - INSIDE JOB - MOSSAD ATTACKS CHARLIE
HEBDO
Indications that the Paris Attack was an inside job, involving Mossad and
the French security services. QUESTIONS:
·
Why did
the attack happen now? weren't the first cartoons published in 2006 and the
second batch 7 months ago?
·
Police
chief in Limoges, France, just committed suicide, and 'he was working with
the judiciary police on the case of Charlie Hebdo'? here's the link to the
French article
·
First
news website to disclose the identities of the "suspects" was a Zionist
website in French language, see link below before it gets removed
The
website obtained all three identities from a Facebook post made by Pierre
Martinet a former DGSE agent (post on Facebook has been removed but link is
the url above). Zionist news website also posted the ids before everyone
else, from a "high level" source they won’t disclose. this was before the
scoop made it to the news channel.
·
the
getaway car of the terrorists at Charlie Hebdo, was abandoned in front of
a.... kosher pastry shop.. you can’t make this up. see link with pictures at
the Zionist website here:
·
The guy
on the roof wearing the flack jacket in the street video appeared on CNN and
lied through his teeth. That whole roof top crew were agents.
1. CBC
News reported:
The
journalists from Charlie Hebdo only gather in their Paris office once per
week. "A Charlie Hebdo reporter told the French newspaper Le Monde that the
attackers had to have been informed that the editorial meeting was taking
place, otherwise there are not many people on the premises."
Who
would have informed the shooters about the meeting on that day? A little
help from the NSA or what?
2. There
was police INSIDE the Charlie Hebdo offices BEFORE the attack took place.
"Two officers who had been assigned to protect editor and cartoonist
Stephane Charbonnier for the past several years came down from an upper
floor and intercepted the gunmen."
Confusion as French hunt magazine attack suspects
How is
it that the police seemed so useless? A journalist at Charlie Hebdo let the
gunmen into the heavily protected offices.Strangely, there were no armed
police outside the offices.
3. There were heavily armed police in the vicinity and all over
the center of Paris.
"Outside the building, as the gunmen tried to
flee in their Citroën van, three officers in a police patrol car intercepted
them. "Two suspects got out of the van..."An officer ...ran toward the
suspects. But the officer was shot and wounded by the suspects. He was
executed with a shot to the head as he lay on the sidewalk."
Confusion as French hunt magazine attack suspects
After
this policeman was allegedly 'shot' in the head with blanks,
there is no sign of
blood or blown off head!
There are 3 different
accounts of who this policeman was. In one account he is an officer who
emerged from a police car. In another account he is a policeman who came out
of a police station. And in a third account he is a policeman who was on a
bicycle.
CanSpeccy alerted us to this video. Google keeps on censoring this
affair, so here it is on LiveLeak.com
- Charlie Hebdo police officer shooting zoomed in ...
Google
has been removing the videos that show this fake shot.
He wasn’t shot as video analysis shows this filming was staged for
propaganda purposes.
It also
happens that this “officer” is a Mossad agent using a false muslim name.
It winds up now that he is real name is
Avigdor who pretended to be muslim by using a muslim name. French officer
Ahmed Merabet is actually Mossad agent Avigdor, his brother’s name is
Maloch. See
Ellie Katsnelson
— “I Know who was behind the Paris Attacks!”
4. After allegedly “killing” the officer, the gunmen returned to their
car, shouting, 'We avenged the Prophet Muhammad,' the source said."
Confusion as French hunt magazine attack suspects
The
purpose of this source would appear to be to label the gunmen as Moslems,
rather than assets of Mossad and the French government.
5. Mossad
and the French security services appear to have had
their posters
printed in advance?
Sasha
Reingewirtz, 28, president of the Jewish Students Union, said of the
killers: "They want to scare French citizens."
Confusion as French Hunt
Magazine Attack Suspects
Amchai Stein, the deputy
editor of Israeli IBA
Channel 1, just happened to be at the scene and has been posting
photos of the shooting.
6. In
false flag attacks, the alleged terrorists allegedly leave behind identity
cards or passports.
7. In false flag attacks, the authorities often give conflicting
evidence.
"Two senior U.S. counter-terrorism officials told NBC News
that one of the suspects in the attack had been killed and that two others
were in custody."
Confusion as French hunt magazine attack suspects
The
'patsies' were probably in custody before the attack.
8. In false flag attacks, the security services need 'patsies'.
The French authorities have named the 'patsies' as Said Kouachi,
Cherif Kouachi and Hamyd Mourad.
Several of Hamyd's
school friends have taken to Twitter saying he was in class with them at the
time of the attack.
nst.com.my/node/68945
The Kouachi brothers have secular (non religious) backgrounds, just like
the 9/11 patsies.
nytimes
Said Kouachi, 34, and his brother Cherif, 32, were orphans who were
brought up in a care home in Rennes in northern France.
dailymail.
The CIA and its friends like to mind-control orphans
from children's homes to turn them into useful patsies.
The brothers
had menial jobs such as pizza delivery man, and shop assistant.
9.
Charlie
Hebdo has reportedly made fun of the Mossad agent Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi
(Simon Elliot) who is the leader of ISIS.
....
10.
CanSpeccy alerted us to this video which apparently shows the fake
shooting of the policeman.
Does the
shooting of the policeman look totally fake?
Twelve people, 10 journalists and two policemen, were reportedly killed.
Amchai Stein,
the deputy editor of
Israeli
IBA Channel 1, just happened to be at the scene and has been posting
photos of the shooting.
"Two black-hooded men entered the building
with Kalashnikovs. A few minutes later we heard lots of shots," a witness
told local TV station iTele, adding that the men were then seen fleeing the
building.
The attackers spoke perfect French and reportedly said that
they support the CIA militia called al Qaeda.
Charlie Hebdo's
editor-in-chief Gerard Biard escaped the attack because he was in London.
11.
They were able to pull off their attack without any problems from the
police. NONE were shot or wounded by the police, who are crawling all over
Paris, except on that day. An AK 47 and it makes one helluva recoil, unlike
that phony recoil you see--or don't see--in the above video.
‘Benoit
Bringer, a journalist with Agence Premiere Ligne who saw the attack, told
the iTele network he saw several masked men armed with machine guns. He
said two officers arrived on bicycles, then — apparently unarmed — they
left.'”
http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2015/01/robert-farago/eyewitness-unarmed-french-police-arrived-terrorist-attack-left/
12. As terrorists and extremist nutjobs, why didn't they destroy
the offices of c.h; and everything related to the cartoons that supposedly
pushed them to commit such a heinous act? (isn't that what isis and the
likes do?) They shouted 'we have avenged the prophet mohammad!', not
followed by 'peace be upon him', which is a phrase almost everyone of the
1.6 billion muslims in the world says following the prophet's name (pbuh),
let alone radical religious extremists.
13.
in one of the photos the police officers are laughing and joking next to the
shot up car where someone supposedly died. Additionally, images on Google of
shot up windshields have cracks going all through the windshield. In this
France event, all damage is limited to where the holes are. Is that
possible?
14.
All people who responded to the scene had French Foreign Legion haircuts.
Odd for ambulance drivers and EMT's.
15.
How did the road miraculously have no traffic? The scene is set up as if
staged. It is as if the area was cordoned off prior to the "attack" for a
drill, so the "terrorists" simply parked smack dab in the middle of the road
because they knew there would be no traffic.
16.
All video initially posted was shot from rooftops. FOR A SCENE THAT LASTED
LESS THAN A MINUTE. How did anyone get up to the roof that fast to get video
of this, times several people shooting from different places? The roof tops
were just regular roof tops with no reason for anyone to be up there. It is
not like there was a roof top Starbucks or something. Why were people up
there to begin with, how did they figure out what was going on and have
their cell phones all ready to shoot video from perfect angles from start to
finish?
ANSWER:
They went up ahead of time, got in position, and shot video of a drill they
knew would happen. It is the only rational answer. Even if they were a
roofing crew, they would not have figured out something was going on and had
camera phones (times several) shooting clear video in under 15 seconds to
capture this less than a minute long event. The staged camera angles and
time frame alone nails this as a fraud, such timing and positioning is
flatly impossible. Even the robot android DATA from Star Trek could not have
gotten up to the roof that fast, found where to shoot the best video from
and captured this so well.
17.:
Getaway driver was in school at the time of the "incident"
Classmates stand up for him.
The
classmates of an 18-year-old suspect in the Paris shooting, that occurred
yesterday afternoon at the offices of Charlie Hebdo magazine, have protested
his innocence by saying that he was in class at the time of the incident in
which 12 people were murdered.
Hamyd
Mourad was reported to have handed himself to the police at around 11pm last
night after he saw his name mentioned on the news and his friends and
acquaintances have said that he has an alibi, as they claim he was present
in the classrooms that day.
It won't
matter, just like the Boston bombing, where dorm room mates said Tsnarev was
not at the bombing scene when it happened. Once they name a patsy, he is
TOAST. What an innocent dupe Hamyd was for turning himself in expecting the
system to be just when running a Jewish scam! Gitmo time!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XFxrXa0u9s8#t=14
The footage of the Charlie Hebdo shootings has been restricted or taken down
from a number of websites. As you will see it contains no blood, gore or
graphic violence. It does however punch a major hole in the official story.
You can draw your own conclusions.
The clip was played on France 24. You'll notice in the middle that a section
is edited out.
Let's look at the clip that was edited out for obvious reasons as it exposes
the false flag operation clearly.
Now if we zoom in and slow it down you'll see that the officer isn't
actually hit by a bullet. There is a blast that hits the sidewalk just in
front of him, but he is clearly not hit in the head as the corporate media
is claiming.
Let's watch it again. Notice that the head isn't rocked by the blast as it
would be if he was actually hit. Notice the plume of dust about a foot in
front of him as the shot hits the ground. This is a AK-47. A hit to the head
would splatter blood and brains all over the sidewalk.
Anyone who claims that this footage shows someone being hit in the head by a
7.62×39mm round either has no experience with guns, or is lying. This is a
big bullet that does massive damage and makes a bloody mess. This officer
was NOT killed by a gunshot to the head.
My first thought here was "ok, they missed". Just one problem. Every single
mainstream media outlet is claiming that he was finished off with a shot to
the head, and that's blatantly false.
So then you have to ask, what else are they lying about?
Funny thing is, these guys went to the trouble to put on ski masks, but for
some reason,
according to the authorities, they decided
to leave their identity cards laying in the get away car. That's how the
perpetrators were identified. Really? Come on.
The other funny thing, the suspects wound up dead, so case closed.
Now I'm not going to claim to know what really happened here, but we are
being lied to, and lies like this mean trouble is coming.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XFxrXa0u9s8&feature=player_embedded
Plus we even have a fake news reporter slipping up and saying “The blood on
the ground which has been put there!”
Fake News Reporter saying “The blood on the ground which has been put there”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=i3v8pqosC20
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=QUuYSft1fOw
The above video shows that the security services did the false flag attack
in Paris.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yJEvlKKm6og&feature=player_embedded
This video CLEARLY shows that the cop on the ground was not hit by anything!
They were shooting blanks just as Gordon stated by the distinct sound of a
REAL AK-47 shooting REAL rounds.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W26uPD0ZNw8
Police Chief Helric Fredou Investigating Charlie Hebdo DIES MYSTERIOUSLY!
I urge everybody to go to the original footage of the attack on LiveLeak and
you can easily see this for yourself! Spread the truth
everywhere. We have the smoking gun video that proves they did this in at
least two takes!
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=bc6_1420632668
The mysterious death of Chief Inspector Eldric Fredou is not reported on all
major French medias. This is what I dare post from France about an obvious
false flag which might fuse-up WW3.
The act of terrorism which began three days ago with the murder of the near
totality of the editing staff of Charlie-Hebdo has finished two days later
with a firework of news media showing a double assault by police forces at
two separate locations. The entire drama is shown endlessly on all medias.
To morrow Sunday, rallies under the banner “Je suis Charlie” are expected to
draw crowds of hundreds of thousands all around the nation.
Those are the signs of a false-flag: The killings inside the Magazine
building did occur, as well as the killings at the end. What was fabricated
was the “gunfight” outside in the street, before the terrorists “escaped”.
The US alternative medias were quick to tell that the “gunfight” was staged,
with disaster actors (no blood of the downed policeman who was “shot in the
head”, without a drop of blood, or again the obvious use of blank shots).
This staged scene of a “gunfight” was inserted with the real scenes, in
order to DRAMATIZE the event. This addition of a dramatization, is a PROOF
that the attack was done by more than the terrorists who are now dead.The
French news media have shown the staged “gunfight”, while blurring the
images when the policeman was being “shot in the head”, justifying this
blurring of the image for protecting the public from seeing too much
horror.The French will therefore never know what the American know.
Also the “dead policeman” who “got shot in the head” remains unknown. His
photo i.d. is not shown, while the photo i.d. of all the other victims are
shown.The justification for this omission by the French media is not told,
and no one of the controlled media has raise this issue. Cover-up of a
false-flag? Yes! The French public had been conditioned a day before the
attack, by the highly publicize launching of the latest book from the most
read author named Michel Houelbeck. The book, titled “Soumission”, is
precisely about the French problem with Islam, and its submission to Islam,
being the inevitable outcome. This subject raised could have been a
conditioning to the reading public, since the attack by Islamist was to
occur on the next day, against a weekly newspaper. This detail is not known
in the US, and is in France presented, if ever talked about, as a
“coincidence”. False-flag sign?Yes!
The French government acted within the hour of the attack, in a
coordinated effort of appeasement, while promising to be strong against the
“terrorists”, and not against Islamist, while the medias began inviting
Muslims to explain that Islam is a “religion of peace”. I hear those lines
already by mid-September 2001. Could the Charlie-Hebdo be a French 911? It
looks like it! The MYSTERIOUS DEATH OF THE POLICE CHIEF INVESTIGATING
CHARLIE-HEBDO REMINDS ALSO OF THE MYSTERIOUS DEATH OF INVESTIGATORS OF 911.
If it looks like; if it follows the identical gov/media pattern as a
false-flags; if collateral damages such as death of investigators of a false
flag, then it is a false flag.
Finally the French government admits
errors from having ignored warnings from the US government. It is therefore
expected that both the French and the US, will work more closely in the
future. Aren’t those two nations already colonies to Zion?
What is the purpose to fool the public? The first is to create fear. The
second is either to manufacture a defeatist opinion towards Islam or a
public longing for the NWO promises of peace. The third is to steam-up
strong public emotions towards whatever direction the Zionists want. The
last reason presented by the alternative medias is to mask the latest sex
scandal of Bill Clinton and Crown Prince Andrew, but this last reason is
small theater. The important reason is truly the next to come WW3.
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2015/01/first-question-ask-terror-attack-false-flag.html
“False
flag terrorism” is defined as a government attacking its own people, then
blaming others in order to justify going to war against the people it
blames. Or as Wikipedia
defines it:
False
flag operations are covert operations conducted by governments,
corporations, or other organizations, which are designed to appear as if
they are being carried out by other entities. The name is derived from the
military concept of flying false colors; that is, flying the flag of a
country other than one’s own. False flag operations are not limited to war
and counter-insurgency operations, and have been used in peace-time; for
example, during Italy’s strategy of tension.
The term
comes from the old days of wooden ships, when one ship would hang the flag
of its enemy before attacking another ship. Because the enemy’s flag,
instead of the flag of the real country of the attacking ship, was hung, it
was called a “false flag” attack.
Indeed,
this concept is so well-accepted that rules of engagement for
naval,
air and
land warfare all prohibit false flag attacks.
Leaders
Throughout History Have Acknowledged False Flags
Leaders
throughout history have acknowledged the danger of false flags:
“This
and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when he first appears
he is a protector.”
– Plato
“If
Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of
fighting a foreign enemy.”
– U.S. President James Madison
“A
history of false flag attacks used to manipulate the minds of the people!
“In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations, and
epochs it is the rule.”
― Friedrich Nietzsche
“Terrorism is the best political weapon for nothing drives people harder
than a fear of sudden death”.
– Adolph Hitler
“Why of
course the people don’t want war … But after all it is the leaders of the
country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag
the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a
parliament, or a communist dictatorship … Voice or no voice, the people can
always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have
to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists
for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same
in any country.”
– Hermann Goering, Nazi leader.
“The
easiest way to gain control of a population is to carry out acts of terror.
[The public] will clamor for such laws if their personal security is
threatened”.
– Josef Stalin
People
Are Waking Up to False Flags
People
are slowly waking up to this whole con job by governments who want to
justify war.
More people are talking about the phrase “false flag” than ever before.
***
Share this article with your facebook friends
|
|
|
|
||
|
||||||
