| 
 Al-Jazeerah History
 
 Archives
 
 Mission & Name
 
 Conflict Terminology
 
 Editorials
 
 Gaza Holocaust
 
 Gulf War
 
 Isdood
 
 Islam
 
 News
 
 News Photos
 
 Opinion 
	
	
	Editorials
 
 US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)
 
 www.aljazeerah.info
 
	  
           |  | 
 Why I Voted for the Minority Party Quebec 
	Solidaire    By Mohamed Kamel Al-Jazeerah, CCUN, September 8, 2012
 
 
 Editor's Note
 
 This article was written before announcing election results, which were 
	as follows:
 
 Quebec election results (2012)
 PQ (projected winner) : 54 seats 
	| 54 elected | 0 leadingLiberals: 50 seats 
	| 49 elected | 1 leading
 CAQ: 19 seats 
	| 19 elected | 0 leading
 Québec Solidaire: 2 
	seats | 2 elected | 0 leading
 
 *** When Jean Charest called for election, Quebeckers wondered if he 
	was going back to office or not? And most of us started to question if we 
	were going to vote and if yes, to whom? Are we waking up on September 5th to 
	a minority or a majority government?
 
 We entered this election with 
	one question.  Are we ready to accept Charest’s bill 78 that for the 
	first time in Canada, curbs people’s rights, curbing on freedom of speech 
	while raising tuition fees and introducing his conservative views?  
	Charest governed for 9 years, shaded with corruption that involved many 
	figures and he is not clean from it yet. He called the election to avoid 
	negotiating with the students after issuing his undemocratic bill. For me 
	when a party fails to listen to the new generation and their logic, they 
	wrote their own death certificate.
 
 On the other hand, there is 
	Pauline Marois who has been trying to lead the Parti Québécois (PQ) for 
	years, only succeeding once the party failed in all attempts to gain power.  
	Marois is the leader of the opposition who shyly supported the student 
	movement in refusing the tuition increase and opposing bill 78.
 
 We 
	imagined that she could govern, until she returned to the stone age and 
	started fighting the windmills by not recognizing today’s society.  
	Marois is still dreaming of creating a confrontation between the old and the 
	new Quebec, so she can win a separation referendum. She is re-introducing 
	her party’s vision of a pure white catholic society that pretends to be 
	secular just as a tool to refuse the others.  At the same time, she 
	helped in shifting the party’s policy far from the left, disconnected the 
	movement from the labour movement.
 
 By refusing to accept the others 
	and living in the past through her hard secular dream, Marois wrote her own 
	political death.
 
 Even her own team fragmented into two other 
	parties, Option Nationale (ON) a new small party supported by one of PQ’s 
	old guard, Jacques Parizeau, and Coalition Avenir Québec (CAQ).
 
 Competing with both the Liberal party and the PQ came the new political 
	party, Coalition Avenir Québec (CAQ).  When François Legault exited 
	from the PQ, he formed his new movement representing the far right 
	capitalizing on the remains of Action démocratique Québec (ADQ), a party 
	that was born and died in less than 18 years.  CAQ, similarly to the 
	ADQ, is a soft sovereign movement.  CAQ supported the Liberal in 
	passing bill 78 and is calling for abolishing school boards, which will 
	minimize the participation and the role of taxpayers and parents in managing 
	the education system.  Another party that I can’t support!
 
 Not 
	being able to vote for any of these parties brought me back to the basics of 
	democracy.  Why are we voting strategically? Why don’t we go back to 
	the principals and vote for what we believe in?
 
 I prefer a minority 
	government because it is the only way to allow people’s voice to be heard.  
	When a majority governs, they became a sort of dictatorship.  They 
	don’t fear people and don’t bother with people’s needs or their point of 
	view.  They only serve their own close circle of beneficiaries, and 
	that is proven by the corruption that has shaded our life for a while.
 Some might vote for one of these parties based on one issue to avoid the 
	others.  Some might vote against referendum, others might vote against 
	Marois’ citizen chart and some might vote against bill 78 or the corruption.
 
 I am sure that Quebeckers are not looking for these votes.  Our 
	children deserve better than that. We should come back to the principles. We 
	need a strong party that can raise our concerns and represent the general 
	population.  Québec Solidaire (QS), as small as it is, is co-lead by 
	Françoise David and Amir Khadir, both long time activists for people’s 
	rights and community development, believe in a soft secularity of the state 
	that creates a state without a religion but maintains and respects people’s 
	right in practicing their own believes.
 
 I voted for QS 
	because they support all people’s rights, because their political stand is 
	my political stand.
 
 Are they going to govern? Most properly 
	not now, but maybe some time soon. If this vote didn’t help QS to govern, it 
	will help us magnifying the need to apply the proportional representation.
 
 One day, we will be able to achieve our goal in recognizing the 
	proportional representation, a basic democratic principal that big parties 
	are afraid of applying, because it will bring power back to the people 
	instead of corporations.
   ***
 Mohamed S. Kamel is a Freelance writer, he is a professional 
	engineer, a LEED Green Associate and a recognized project manager 
	professional, he is Member of several civil society organizations, a 
	co-founder of the Alternative Perspective Media (APM-RAM), , Quebec Antiwar 
	movement “Échec à la Guerre”, Canadian Egyptian for Democracy (CEFD), 
	National Association for Change in Egypt (Taghyeer – Canada), Association of 
	the Egyptians of Montreal (AEM). He could be reached at
	public@mohamedkamel.com
 
 http://forfreeegypt.blogspot.ca/2012/09/jai-vote-quebec-solidaire-but-why.html
 
 
 
 |  |  |