| 
 Al-Jazeerah History
 
 Archives
 
 Mission & Name
 
 Conflict Terminology
 
 Editorials
 
 Gaza Holocaust
 
 Gulf War
 
 Isdood
 
 Islam
 
 News
 
 News Photos
 
 Opinion 
	
	
	Editorials
 
 US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)
 
 www.aljazeerah.info
 
	  
           |  | 
 How to Put an End to the 
	Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, Once and For All  By Uri 
	Avnery  
		Gush Shalom, Al-Jazeerah, CCUN, 
		November 26, 2012
 Vote for the Palestinian application for statehood in the UN 
		General Assembly.  Move towards peace with the entire 
		Palestinian people, including Fat'h and Hamas – so we can really put an 
		end to the violence, ONCE AND FOR ALL!
   THE MANTRA of this round was Once And For All.
 “We must put an 
	end to this (the rockets, Hamas, the Palestinians, the Arabs?) Once and For 
	All!” – this cry from the heart was heard dozens of times daily on TV from 
	the harassed inhabitants of Israel’s battered towns and villages in the 
	South.
 
 It has displaced the slogan which dominated several decades: 
	“Bang And Finish!”
 
 It did not quite work.
 
 
 THE BIG 
	winner emerging from the cloud is Hamas.
 
 Until this round, Hamas had 
	a powerful presence in the Gaza Strip, but practically no international 
	standing. The international face of the Palestinian people was Mahmoud 
	Abbas’ Palestinian National Authority.
 
 No more.
 
 Operation 
	Pillar of Cloud has given the Hamas mini-state in Gaza wide international 
	recognition. (Pillar of Cloud is the official Hebrew name, though the army 
	spokesman decreed that the English name, for foreign consumption, should be 
	Pillar of Defense.) Heads of state and droves of other foreign dignitaries 
	made their pilgrimage to the Gaza Strip.
 
 First was the powerful and 
	immensely rich Emir of Qatar, owner of Aljazeera. He was the first head of 
	state ever to enter the Gaza Strip. Then came the Egyptian prime minister, 
	the Tunisian foreign minister, the secretary of the Arab League and the 
	collected Arab foreign ministers (except the one from Ramallah.)
 
 In 
	all diplomatic deliberations, Gaza was treated as a de facto state, with a 
	de facto government (Hamas). The Israeli media were no exception. It was 
	clear to Israelis that any deal, to be effective, must be concluded with 
	Hamas.
 
 Within the Palestinian people, the standing of Hamas shot 
	sky-high. The Gaza Strip alone, smaller than an average American county, has 
	stood up to the mighty Israeli war machine, one of the largest and most 
	efficient in the world. It has not succumbed. The military outcome will be 
	at best a draw.
 
 A draw between tiny Gaza and the powerful Israel 
	means a victory for Gaza.
 
 Who remembers now Ehud Barak’s proud 
	declaration in the middle of the war: “We shall not stop until Hamas gets on 
	its knees and begs for a cease-fire!”
 
 WHERE DOES that leave Mahmoud 
	Abbas? Actually, nowhere.
 
 For a simple Palestinian, whether in 
	Nablus, Gaza or Beirut, the contrast is glaring. Hamas is courageous, proud, 
	upright, while Fat'h is helpless, submissive and despised. Pride and honor 
	play a central role in Arab culture.
 
 After more than half a century 
	of humiliation, any Palestinian who stands up against the (Israeli) 
	occupation is the hero of the Arab masses, in and outside the country. Abbas 
	is identified only with the close cooperation of his security forces with 
	the hated Israeli occupation army. And the most important fact: Abbas has 
	nothing to show for it.
 
 If Abbas could at least show a major 
	political achievement for his pains, the situation might be different. The 
	Palestinians are a sensible people, and if Abbas had come even one step 
	closer to Palestinian statehood, most Palestinians would probably have said: 
	he may not be glamorous, but he delivers the goods.
 
 But the opposite 
	is happening.  Hamas is achieving results, Abbas is not. As a 
	Palestinian told me: “He (Abbas) has given them (the Israelis) everything, 
	quiet and security, and what did [or “does”] he get in return? They spit on 
	his face!”
 
 This round will only reinforce a basic Palestinian 
	conviction: “Israelis understand only the language of force!” (Israelis, of 
	course, say exactly the same about the Palestinians.)
 
 If at least 
	the US had allowed Abbas to achieve a UN resolution recognizing Palestine as 
	a non-member state, he might have held his own against Hamas. But the 
	Israeli government is determined to prevent this by all available means. 
	Barack Obama’s decision, even after re-election, to block the Palestinian 
	effort is a direct support for Hamas and a slap in the face of the 
	“moderates”. Hillary Clinton’s perfunctory visit to Ramallah this week was 
	seen in this context.
 
 Looked at from the outside, this looks like 
	sheer lunacy. Why undermine the “moderates” who want and are able to make 
	peace?
 The answer is openly expressed by Avigdor Lieberman, now Netanyahu’s 
	official political No. 2: he wants to destroy Abbas in order to annex the 
	West Bank and clear the way for the settlers.  
 
 AFTER 
	HAMAS, the big winner is Mohamed Morsi.
 
 This is an almost 
	incredible tale. When Morsi was elected as the president of Egypt, official 
	Israel was in hysteria. How terrible! The Islamists have taken over the most 
	important Arab country! Our peace treaty with our largest neighbor is going 
	down the drain!
 
 US reactions were almost the same.
 
 And now 
	– less than four months later – we hang on every word Morsi utters. He is 
	the man who has put an end to the mutual killing and destruction! He is the 
	great peacemaker! He is the only person who can mediate between Israel and 
	Hamas! He must guarantee the cease-fire agreement!
 
 Can it be? Can 
	this be the same Morsi? The same Muslim Brotherhood?
 
 The 61 year old 
	Morsi (the full name is Mohamed Morsi 'Eissa al-Ayyad. 'Eissa being the 
	Arabic name of Jesus, who is regarded in Islam as a Prophet) is a complete 
	novice on the world stage. Yet at this moment, all the world’s leaders rely 
	on him.
 
	(Actually, Jesus is more elevated in Islam than a Prophet. He is one of 
	the five main Messengers of God. The other four are Noah, Abraham, Moses, 
	and Muhammed - Editor's Note).
 When I wholeheartedly welcomed 
	the Arab Spring, I had people like him in mind. Now almost all the Israeli 
	commentators, ex-generals and politicians, who uttered dire warnings at the 
	time, are lauding his success in achieving a cease-fire.
 
 THROUGHOUT THE operation I did what I always do in such situations: I 
	switched constantly between Israeli TV and Aljazeera. Sometimes, when my 
	thoughts wander, I am unsure for a moment which of the two I am looking at.
 
 Women weeping, wounded being carried away, homes in shambles, 
	children’s shoes strewn around, families packing and fleeing. Here and 
	there. Mirror images. Though, of course, Palestinian casualties were 30 
	 times higher than the Israeli ones – partly because of the incredible 
	success of the Iron Dome interception missiles and home shelters, while the 
	Palestinians were practically defenseless.
 
 On Wednesday I was 
	invited to air my views on Israel’s Channel 2, the most popular (and 
	patriotic) Israeli outlet. The invitation was of course withdrawn at the 
	last moment. Had I been on air, I would have posed to my compatriots one 
	simple question:
 
 Was It Worthwhile?
 
 All the suffering, the 
	killed, the injured, the destruction, the hours and days of terror, the 
	children in trauma?
 
 And, I might add, the endless TV coverage 
	around the clock, with legions of ex-generals appearing on the screen and 
	declaiming the message sheet of the prime minister’s office. And the 
	blood-curdling threats of politicians and other nincompoops, including the 
	son of Ariel Sharon, who proposed flattening neighborhoods in Gaza City, or 
	even better, the whole Strip.
 
 Now that it is over, we are almost 
	exactly where we were before. The operation, commonly referred to in Israel 
	as “another round”, was indeed round – leading nowhere than to where it 
	started.
 
 Hamas will be firmly in control of the Gaza Strip, if not 
	more firmly. The Gazans will hate Israel even more than before. Many of the 
	inhabitants of the West Bank, who throughout the war came out in their 
	thousands in demonstrations for Hamas, will vote in even greater numbers for 
	Hamas in the next elections. Israeli voters will vote in two months as they 
	intended to vote anyhow, before the whole thing started.
 
 Each of the 
	two sides is now celebrating its great victory. If they organized just one 
	joint celebration, a lot of money could be saved.
 
 
 WHAT ARE the 
	political conclusions?
 
 The most obvious one is: talk with Hamas. 
	Directly. Face to face.
 
 Yitzhak Rabin once told me how he came to 
	the conclusion that he must talk with the PLO: after years of opposing  
	it, he realized that they were the only force that counted. “So it was 
	ridiculous to talk with them through intermediaries.”
 
 The 
	same is now true for Hamas. They are there. They will not go away. It is 
	ridiculous for the Israeli negotiators to sit in one room at the Egyptian 
	intelligence service HQ near Cairo, while the Hamas negotiators sit in 
	another room, just a few meters away, with the courteous Egyptians going to 
	and fro.
 
 Concurrently, activate the effort towards peace. 
	Seriously.
 
 Save Abbas. As of now, he has no replacement. Give him 
	an immediate victory to balance the Hamas achievements.
	Vote for the Palestinian application for statehood 
	in the UN General Assembly.
 
 Move towards peace with the entire Palestinian 
	people, including Fat'h and Hamas – so we can really put an end to the 
	violence,
 
 ONCE AND FOR ALL!
 
 
 |  |  |