| 
 Al-Jazeerah History
 
 Archives
 
 Mission & Name
 
 Conflict Terminology
 
 Editorials
 
 Gaza Holocaust
 
 Gulf War
 
 Isdood
 
 Islam
 
 News
 
 News Photos
 
 Opinion 
	
	
	Editorials
 
 US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)
 
 www.aljazeerah.info
 
	  
           |  | 
 Zionist History Quiz About Two Decades of 
	  Israeli Extremist Policies  By Neve Gordon Redress, Al-Jazeerah, CCUN, May 15, 2012   
	  Zionist history: a short quiz The quiz
 Neve Gordon 
	  highlights the slide in Israeli political thought over the past 20 years 
	  with a quiz the answers to which “expose just how far right Israeli 
	  politics, as well as the public discourse informing it, have shifted”.
 
 Take this test to find out how much you know about the gradual shift 
	  in Israeli political thought over the decades.
 
 Not long after 
	  Israel celebrated its 64th birthday on 26 April, a friend prepared a quiz 
	  of sorts. She read out loud political quotes to about 10 guests who were 
	  having dinner at my house, and asked us to identify the politician who had 
	  uttered each statement.
 
 Truth be told, none of my guests did very 
	  well on the quiz, but I thought that readers acquainted with Zionist 
	  history might do better and would be able to identify the source of each 
	  of the following statements. There is only one rule to this game: all 
	  search engines, including Google, are off limits.
 
		  "Does a bad law become a good one just because Jews apply it? I 
		  say that this law is bad from its very foundation and does not become 
		  good because it is practiced by Jews... We oppose administrative 
		  detention in principle. There is no place for such detention." 
		  "We do not accept the semi-official view ... wherein the state 
		  grants rights and is entitled to rescind them. We believe that there 
		  are human rights that precede the human form of life called a state." 
		  "We have learned that an elected parliamentary majority can be an 
		  instrument in the hands of a group of rulers and act as camouflage for 
		  their tyranny. Therefore, the nation must, if it chooses freedom, 
		  determine its rights also with regard to the House of Representatives 
		  in order that the majority thereof, that serves the regime more than 
		  it oversees it, should not negate these rights." 
		  "We would propose that the Knesset enact a law of its own free 
		  will, limiting its authority and stipulating that it will not tolerate 
		  any legislation that limits oral or written freedom of expression or 
		  association, or other basic civil and human rights to be enumerated 
		  before the constitution, law, and Justice Committee." 
		  "The day will come when a government elected by our people will 
		  fulfill the first promise made to the people on the establishment of 
		  the state, namely: to elect a founding assembly whose chief function – 
		  in any country on earth – is to provide the people with a constitution 
		  and issue legislative guarantees of civil liberties and national 
		  liberty... For the nation will then be free – above all, free of fear, 
		  free of hunger, free of the fear of starvation. That day will come. I 
		  can sense that it is coming soon." 
		  Confused yet?"Some say that it is impossible for us to provide full equal 
		  rights to Arab citizens of the state because they do not fulfill full 
		  equal obligations. But this is a strange claim. True, we decided not 
		  to obligate Arab residents, as distinguished from the Druze, to 
		  perform military service. But we decided this of our own free will, 
		  and I believe that the moral reason for it is valid. Should war break 
		  out, we would not want one Arab citizen to face the harsh human test 
		  that our own people had experienced for generations." If you are having trouble identifying the 
	  author, you are not alone. After hearing the quotes, I, too, wondered why 
	  they were so difficult to decipher. But, following a few misguided 
	  guesses, I recognized the source of the difficulty. The quiz was 
	  counterintuitive, and not only because all of the statements were uttered
	  by a single politician.
 No doubt, time has done its work 
	  and what was once pronounced by the undisputed leader of the Israeli 
	  right, now sounds more like declarations coming out of the liberal and far 
	  left – such as Knesset members from Meretz and Hadash. Even the head of 
	  the Labour Party, Sheli Yichimovich, does not oppose administrative 
	  detention, and does not dare to claim that "there are human rights that 
	  precede the human form of life called a state", probably for fear of 
	  losing potential voters.
 
 My friend's quiz managed to expose just 
	  how far right Israeli politics, as well as the public discourse informing 
	  it, have shifted over the years; so much so that, within the current 
	  political climate, declarations once uttered by former Prime Minister 
	  Menachem Begin, who passed away 20 years ago, can now only be reiterated 
	  by leftists.
 
 I have no doubt that if Menachem Begin, commander of 
	  the infamous Irgun militia during 1943-48, were alive today and would 
	  utter these very same statements in the Knesset, his own party members 
	  from the Likud – as well as the Israeli majority – would condemn him. 
	  Today, citizens who hold such positions are simply called "traitors".
 A version of this article first appeared on Al-Jazeera’s
		  website. The 
		  version here is published by permiission of Neve Gordon.
 
     
 |  |  |