| 
 Al-Jazeerah History
 
 Archives
 
 Mission & Name
 
 Conflict Terminology
 
 Editorials
 
 Gaza Holocaust
 
 Gulf War
 
 Isdood
 
 Islam
 
 News
 
 News Photos
 
 Opinion 
	
	
	Editorials
 
 US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)
 
 www.aljazeerah.info
 
	  
           |  | Iran-West relations, Expansionist Israeli Regime, 
	and Arab Spring
 
 Yvonne Ridley Interviewed By Kourosh Ziabari
 
 Al-Jazeerah, CCUN, March 26, 2012
 
 
 
 Barack Obama is a one-term president
 You would certainly know 
	  Yvonne Ridley or at least heard of her name if you have been a regular 
	  follower of Press TV, especially in Britain, albeit before the state-run 
	  media regulator Ofcom took the news network off the Sky platform, 
	  depriving millions of Britons of the opportunity to watch a TV channel 
	  which has always tried to shed a light on the obscured, concealed aspects 
	  of the events and tell the truth about what's happening around the world. 
	  Ridley is a renowned British journalist, war correspondent and TV host. 
	  She made the headlines on September 28, 2001 when she was arrested by the 
	  Taliban members in Afghanistan while working for the Sunday Express. She 
	  converted to Islam after she was released by Taliban on October 9, 2001 
	  and became an outspoken critic of Zionism and the mainstream media's 
	  portrayal of the War on Terror. Ridley is a member of the National Union 
	  of Journalists and the International Federation of Journalists. She is a 
	  devoted philanthropist and humanitarian activist. Yvonne Ridley has 
	  written two books called "In the Hands of the Taliban" and "Ticket to 
	  Paradise."
 Ridley took part in an interview with me, discussing her viewpoints 
	regarding the prospect of Iran-West relations, the expansionistic policies 
	of the Israeli regime in the Occupied Palestine and the popular uprisings of 
	the Arab world widely known as Arab Spring.
 Kourosh Ziabari: One of 
	the recent events which stained the already blurred relations between Iran 
	and the UK was Iranian students' assault on the British embassy in Tehran in 
	the late 2011. Some political analysts say that it was an undiplomatic 
	action and Britain's response in closing the Iranian embassy in London was 
	natural. However, some others believe that it was an intrinsic consequence 
	of the UK's hostile policies toward Iran. What's your viewpoint in this 
	regard?
 
 Yvonne Ridley: As the UK Government found out last year, 
	when students get angry and in a destructive mode nothing will stop them. 
	The Conservative Party headquarters in London was trashed and vandalized by 
	angry students in the UK who felt they had been lied to over the increase in 
	student fees. And they caused much more damage to the Tory Party HQ than the 
	rampaging students in Tehran, yet no one accused the British police of 
	turning a blind eye or encouraging acts of vandalism and violence. The UK 
	Government was, however, outraged but I feel it used the event as an 
	opportunity to accelerate hostile relations between both countries.
 
 KZ: Tensions between Iran and the West has been mounting in recent months, 
	especially since IAEA released its latest report on Iran's nuclear program. 
	What's your prediction for the future of Iran-West relations? Do you foresee 
	any chances of reconciliation and restoration?
 
 YR: The tensions are 
	predictable and there is a weary feeling of deja vu among anti war activists 
	who fear the worst between Iran and the West having witnessed a similar 
	build up of hostilities over non-existed WMD in Iraq during Saddam's rule.
 
 KZ: Israel, the U.S. and their European allies have repeatedly 
	threatened Iran against a preemptive military strike. Are these war threats 
	realistic or merely media propaganda aimed at intimidating the Iranians? Why 
	doesn't the UN take any decisive action against the states who propagate 
	such threats and spread fear?
 
 YR: The UN is weak and in the sway and 
	influence of America but I doubt if there will be a military strike, for 
	several different reasons. The USA is struggling in Afghanistan against the 
	Taliban, a bunch of ill-equipped fighters in flip flops and shalwa khameez 
	so there is no way it would tackle Iran which has a strong army, is armed 
	and will retaliate. Furthermore there are tens of thousands of U.S. and 
	other western civilians, oil workers, missionaries and NGOs in Iraq and if 
	one single strike touched Iranian soil, there is a very real danger 10 
	million or so Shiite in neighboring Iraq will rise up against westerners. 
	This could manifest itself in another disastrous hostage situation similar 
	to the one in Iran from which the USA has still not psychologically 
	recovered.
 
 KZ: The U.S. and its European allies are persuasively 
	lobbying around the world to convince the economic partners of Iran join the 
	global sanctions, especially the newly proposed oil embargo against Iran. 
	Will these sanctions bear fruit for the U.S. or it will backfire? Will the 
	economic pressures finally bring Iran to its knees?
 
 YR: Iran is not 
	marginalized or as isolated as the U.S. and UK would want. Several countries 
	in the Euro-zone rely on Iran for cheap oil while Russia, China, Brazil, 
	Venezuela and other countries in South America have expressed solidarity 
	with Iran.
 
 KZ: President Barack Obama had promised during his 
	presidential campaign that he would pursue a policy of detente and tension 
	easing with the Muslim world, especially Iran, and follow the path of 
	diplomacy and "change" to resolve Iran's nuclear controversy. But we saw 
	that he followed the path of his predecessor and even talked of the option 
	of a nuclear strike against Iran. What's your idea about his approach toward 
	the Middle East in general, and Iran in particular? Has he fulfilled his 
	promise of change?
 
 YR: This latest U.S. president, given a Nobel 
	peace Prize because he was not George W. Bush, is a one-term president. He 
	made many promises on the road to the White House and broke more than 60 
	percent of them. He is, sadly, a man who promised to deliver so much and 
	failed. He escalated the war in Afghanistan, was forced to retreat from Iraq 
	- make no mistake the departure of American troops in Iraq was reluctantly 
	done and the soldiers left in one of the quietest U.S. exits in history.
 
 KZ: What has been in your view, the main stimulus behind the revolutions 
	of the Arab world? We know that corrupt regimes had existed in countries 
	such as Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, Bahrain and Yemen for many decades, but the 
	nations of the region revolted against their rulers all at once. What's the 
	reason in your view?
 
 YR: The people lost their fear in the tyrants, 
	most installed and supported by the West; and as they grew stronger they 
	began to rediscover their Faith in God and as they got closer to their Faith 
	they became stronger as they held on tight to the Rope of Allah.
 
 KZ: 
	Will the chained revolutions of the Arab world, especially the revolution in 
	Egypt, weaken the status of Israel in the Middle East? What about the U.S.? 
	Political commentators believe that if the revolutionaries in Bahrain and 
	Yemen achieve their goal, the United States will lose two of its strategic 
	allies in the region. What's your take on that?
 
 YR: The U.S. was 
	caught out by the Arab Spring, but since the CIA missed the fall of the 
	Berlin Wall it is hardly surprising that there was a huge intelligence 
	failure in this area. Israel is unusually mute because it is very concerned 
	over what is going to manifest from the revolutions and it can no longer 
	rely on the USA to crack the whip and make the tyrants pull their people 
	into line. The U.S. has already lost its control in the region and should 
	Yemen and Bahrain succumb to the will of the majority then it will lose 
	strategic allies.
 
 KZ: It seems that the United States will not lift 
	its unconditional support for Israel, at least in the foreseeable future, 
	and Israel will be able to continue its repressive policies in the occupied 
	lands and with regards to the subjugated people of the West Bank and Gaza 
	Strip like before. What's your assessment regarding the current state of the 
	Israeli-Palestinian conflict? Will the Arab League supported initiative for 
	peace help solve the crisis?
 
 YR: My belief in this solution has been 
	the same for more than three decades, much longer than I've been a Muslim. 
	The Palestinian people will be victorious because they have time and 
	patience on their side. In 50 years time their children will ask: "Was there 
	really a state called Israel?" Israel is on a permanent war footing and not 
	one single country can survive in that situation forever. I'll give the 
	Zionist another decade before it implodes.
 
 KZ: Israel is the sole 
	possessor of nuclear weapons in the Middle East and it's not a signatory to 
	Non-Proliferation Treaty, as well. The United States has not allowed a 
	comprehensive investigation of the nuclear facilities of Israel so far, and 
	Tel Aviv regime is continuing to develop nuclear bombs in its underground 
	installations. Isn't the nuclear program of Israel a threat to international 
	peace and security?
 
 YR: What nuclear weapons? Israel says it has no 
	nukes! Pf course the world knows they are lying thanks to the heroic 
	Christian convert Mordechai Vanunu who is still being persecuted for telling 
	the world about the Zionist State's deadly arsenal of nuclear weapons. The 
	poor man has served his sentence but he is still not allowed to leave Israel 
	where he is under continuous surveillance. The vindictiveness of the state 
	knows no bounds when it comes to this man.
 
 KZ: And finally, let me 
	ask your idea about the Occupy Wall Street movement. Why has such a 
	revolutionary movement taken shape in the U.S.? What are the major 
	grievances of the protesters? What's your idea regarding the government's 
	treatment of the protestors?
 
 YR: A number of American people have 
	woken up to the injustices of capitalism and what is being done in their 
	name by the U.S. Government - this wonderful movement has captured the 
	imagination of many and while they are taking their fight to the streets of 
	the USA and the West there is another army that the USA should really be 
	concerned about ... Anonymous. They are leading the battle in cyber-warfare 
	and are showing that when the people rise up and they begin to lead the 
	leaders become increasingly irrelevant. Watch this space.
 
 
 |  |  |