| 
 Listening and Learning: Arab Opinion Matters
	 By James Zogby Al-Jazeerah, CCUN, January 18, 2012   I listened attentively to Syrian President Bashar al Assad's most recent 
	speech in which he berated the Arab League's intervention to help stem the 
	violence currently racking his country. Claiming that he was listening to 
	his countrymen and speaking for them and that his regime was the 
	standard-bearer of "Arabism,” al Assad denounced the League as not 
	representing true Arab sentiment. For obvious reasons, we can't poll in 
	Syria right now, but as the past ten months of mass protests and the 
	unremitting and largely regime-sponsored violence have made clear, al Assad 
	may speak for some, but certainly not all Syrians. On the other hand, we have polled about Syria across the Arab World, and 
	what we find is that it is al Assad who is out of touch with the reality of 
	Arab opinion or, as he might put it, "the beating heart of Arabism.” In 
	every country surveyed, including Egypt, Lebanon, and Jordan, we learn that 
	overwhelming majorities of Arabs side with the Syrian demonstrators and say 
	that it is time for the al Assad government to step down. I love polling because it erases doubt as to what people are really 
	thinking. What I have learned from my brother, John Zogby, is that when you 
	survey public opinion, everyone’s views count. I call it the "respectful 
	science.” You ask, they answer. Responses get organized by age, gender, 
	education level attained, income, region, and more. When you present the 
	results, it is as if you've opened a window, letting in the voices of a 
	society, so that you hear what they are saying about their lives, their 
	aspirations, and their attitudes. I'm in the United Arab Emirates right now, teaching a short course on the 
	importance of public opinion at New York University's Abu Dhabi campus. 
	Looking at the most recent polling we have done across the Middle East and 
	North Africa makes clear some of the problems facing this region while 
	providing keys to solutions for some of the big issues, as well. It is not only in Syria that we need to listen and learn. When we go next 
	door to Iraq, where we see the government of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki 
	making a power grab, exacerbating the risk of internal civil conflict, we 
	find strong majorities deeply worried about the future of their country, 
	rejecting division and favoring instead a government that can create jobs, 
	end corruption, and provide the stability and basic services needed for all 
	Iraqis to lead decent and productive lives. While Iran's leadership is busy provocatively and aggressively playing 
	their nuclear card, our polling there reveals that the democracy movement 
	remains strong among Iranians. All across the country, the top priority 
	concerns, in addition to employment, are democracy, civil and personal 
	rights, political reform, and an end to corruption.  At the same time, polling in the Arab World also offers a cautionary 
	warning to the West's strategy to confront Iran's leaders. While it is true 
	that Iran's favorable ratings among Arabs have plummeted and are now less 
	than one half of what they were just five years ago, should the West or 
	Israel attack Iran, all bets are off. Since the only countries with 
	significantly lower favorable ratings than Iran in the Arab region are the 
	U.S. and Israel, the best way to resurrect Iran's ratings would be for the 
	U.S. or Israel to attack it.  While we are looking at the U.S., it too needs to listen better to Arab 
	opinion. America's favorable ratings among Arabs, which were at dangerously 
	low levels during the Bush Administration, got a boost from the change in 
	policy expected by the election of Barack Obama. Three years later, U.S. 
	favorable ratings are lower than they were in 2008, as Arabs see no change 
	in how America relates to the issue they still see as central to their 
	relationship with the West—that is, the unresolved matter of Palestinian 
	freedom and dignity. Israel, too, should listen, but given that country's hard-line direction, 
	they have become increasingly tone deaf to Arab and world opinion. Our polls 
	show that the Arab public still supports the Arab League's peace initiative 
	for a two state solution, but a majority of Arabs in every country no longer 
	believe that Israel has any interest in making peace. Prime Minister 
	Netanyahu's behavior and U.S. acquiescence to Israel's policies are 
	radicalizing Arab opinion creating a more dangerous and volatile environment 
	with every passing day. We have also polled in the two Arab countries where uprisings brought 
	down governments, creating the possibility for change. But those who have 
	been newly elected in Tunisia and Egypt must now pay attention to what the 
	voices of their countrymen are saying. In both countries the number one 
	concern is expanding employment. While Tunisians also want an expansion of 
	democracy, and "increasing women's rights" is high up on their list of 
	political priorities, Egyptians are more focused on the basic needs of life 
	and "ending corruption.” The success or failure of these "revolutions" will 
	be measured by their ability to meet the expectations that inspired them. Listening to opinion is also critical for other governments in the 
	region. In Saudi Arabia, for example, far and away the number one concern is 
	the need to expand employment. With a "youth bulge" necessitating the 
	creation of three million new jobs over the next decade, Saudis want to know 
	that their children will be educated and find meaningful work in their 
	country. And in our surveys of business leaders in the Gulf region we find a 
	growing concern that opportunities be created to support private sector 
	economic growth, so that small businesses can become the engine driving this 
	needed job creation. Business leaders recognize that it is simply not a 
	sustainable situation for the government to be the "employer of first 
	resort" absorbing this growing work force. The private sector must be 
	involved.  As I explain in my recent book "Arab 
	Voices: What they Are Saying to Us and Why It Matters" and now in my NYU 
	course, Arab opinion matters. It clearly matters to the West which has long 
	ignored Arab sentiment. But the views of the public matter within the region 
	as well. The sooner leaders, East and West, listen and learn, the sooner 
	real change can occur.  *** Opinion Polls
 Arab Opinion Polls
	
	Methodology Information for Arab Voices
 The methodology information for the Zogby International surveys 
	referenced in Arab Voices by Dr. James Zogby. Each survey was conducted 
	using face‐to‐face interviews with respondents in major metropolitan areas 
	identified through multi‐stage stratified sampling. All respondents were 
	adults
 18 and older. All surveys were conducted in Arabic or a local 
	dialect. Margins of error are higher in sub‐groups.
 
	
	Arab Opinion Polls: U.S. Withdrawal from Iraq, Arab Political 
	Concerns and Social Media (2011) During the month of September 2011, Zogby Research Services conducted 
	surveys in Iraq, six other Arab countries, the United States, and Iran. AAI 
	released three polls (Iraq; 
	The War, Its Consequences & the Future; Poltical Concerns and Government; 
	Social Media & the Arab Spring) on December 19, 2011. 
	
	Arab Attitudes Toward Syria (2011) 
		Findings from this poll reveal no Arab support for the Syrian government 
		and U.S. role viewed as negative. 
	 
		This is an Arab American Institute poll with analysis by AAI President 
		James Zogby. It was conducted between September 14 – October 3, 2011. 
		Over 4,000 Arabs were surveyed, with a margin of error of +/- 3.5% in 
		Morocco, Egypt, KSA; and +/- 4.5% in Lebanon, Jordan, UAE. Findings from this poll reveal no Arab support for the Syrian government 
	and U.S. role viewed as negative. This is an Arab American Institute poll with analysis by AAI President 
	James Zogby. It was conducted between September 14 – October 3, 2011. Over 
	4,000 Arabs were surveyed, with a margin of error of +/- 3.5% in Morocco, 
	Egypt, KSA; and +/- 4.5% in Lebanon, Jordan, UAE. 
	
	Arab Attitudes Toward Iran (2011)
 Findings from part two 
	of the the latest Arab American Institute six Arab nations poll show real 
	concern with Iran’s current and future role in the region.
 
 The poll 
	surveys six Arab nations’ attitudes towards Iran and other Gulf Cooperation 
	Council (GCC) issues. The key finding is that a substantial majority of 
	Arabs believe that Iran plays a negative role in both Iraq and the Arab Gulf 
	region. Conducted during the first three weeks of June by Zogby 
	International, over 4,000 Arabs were surveyed, with a margin of error of +/- 
	3.5% in Morocco, Egypt, KSA; and +/- 4.5% in Lebanon, Jordan, UAE.
 
	
	Arab Attitudes (2011) With the 2008 election of Barack Obama, favorable attitudes toward the 
	U.S. more than doubled in many Arab countries. But in the two years since 
	his famous “Cairo speech,” ratings for both the U.S. and the President have 
	spiraled downwards. The President is seen overwhelmingly as failing to meet 
	the expectations set during his speech, and the vast majority of those 
	surveyed disagree with U.S policies. 
 In five out of the six 
	countries surveyed, the U.S. was viewed less favorably than Turkey, China, 
	France—or Iran. Far from seeing the U.S. as a leader in the post-Arab Spring 
	environment, the countries surveyed viewed “U.S. interference in the Arab 
	world” as the greatest obstacle to peace and stability in the Middle East, 
	second only to the continued Palestinian occupation.
 
	
	2010 Six Nation Survey Results for this survey are based on face-to-face interviews conducted 
	under the direction of Zogby International. All surveys are based on urban 
	samples except in Lebanon where the sample was nationwide. The tables show the margin of sampling error based on all interviews 
	conducted in that country. For results based on the full sample in a given 
	country, one can say with 95% confidence that the error attributable to 
	sampling and other random effects is plus or minus the margin of error. In 
	addition to sampling error, one should bear in mind that question wording 
	and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias 
	into the findings of opinion polls. 
	
	Arab Voices Book Survey (2010)
 Summary of survey data used in Arab Voices: What 
	They Are Saying to Us, and Why it Matters.
 
	
	Arab Opinions on President Obama’s First 100 Days: A Six Nation 
	Survey (2009) On Attitudes toward President Obama and the United States: Since 
	President Barack Obama’s election, there has been a change in Arab attitude 
	toward the United States. In Saudi Arabia (KSA), the UAE, Lebanon and 
	Morocco, over 50 percent of the public polled say their attitude toward the 
	United States is more positive as a result of Barack Obama being elected 
	President. In Jordan and Egypt, a majority remains neutral with only about 
	one-in-four saying their attitude has changed for the better. The UAE, 
	however, is the only Arab country where a majority of respondents hold a 
	favorable opinion of the United States overall. 
	
	6 Nation Survey of the Middle East: Arab Broadcast Forum (2008)
 Results for this survey are based on face-to-face interviews conducted 
	under the direction of Zogby International. All surveys are based on urban 
	samples except in Lebanon where the sample was nationwide.
 
 The tables 
	show the margin of sampling error based on all interviews conducted in that 
	country. For results based on the full sample in a given country, one can 
	say with 95% confidence that the error attributable to sampling and other 
	random effects is plus or minus the margin of error. In addition to sampling 
	error, one should bear in mind that question wording and practical 
	difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the 
	findings of opinions polls.
 
	
	6 Nation Survey of the Middle East: Arab Economic Forum (2008)
 Results for this survey are based on face-to-face interviews conducted 
	under the direction of Zogby International. All surveys are based on urban 
	samples except in Lebanon where the sample was nationwide.
 
 The tables 
	show the margin of sampling error based on all interviews conducted in that 
	country. For results based on the full sample in a given country, one can 
	say with 95% confidence that the error attributable to sampling and other 
	random effects is plus or minus the margin of error. In addition to sampling 
	error, one should bear in mind that question wording and practical 
	difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the 
	findings of opinions polls.
 
	
	Arab Views of Leadership, Identity, Institutions and Issues of 
	Concern (2007)
 All fieldwork in this survey was 
	conducted between November 1, 2007 and December 25, 2007 in the following 
	nations (dates vary slightly by country).
 
	
	Four Years Later: Arab Opinion Troubled By Consequences of Iraq War 
	(2007)
 Four years after the start of the US-led war in 
	Iraq, the Arab world is deeply worried about the consequences of that 
	conflict. Of particular concern is the degree to which the war has 
	emboldened neighboring Iran and the heightened danger that Iraq, as a 
	country, may unravel in a civil war that could spill over into the broader 
	region.
 
 These are a few of the highlights of the Zogby International 
	(ZI)/Arab American Institute (AAI) poll conducted between February 26 and 
	March 10, 2007. The poll, which surveyed 3,400 Arabs in Egypt, Saudi Arabia, 
	Jordan, UAE and Lebanon, had a margin of error of +/-3.5% in Egypt and Saudi 
	Arabia and +/- 4.1% in Jordan, the UAE and Lebanon.
 
	
	James Zogby Testimony to House Committee on Foreign Affairs (2007) House Committee on Foreign Affairs, Subcommittee on International 
	Organizations, Human Rights, and Oversight, and Subcommittee on Middle East 
	and Asia Arab Opinion on American Policies, Values and People  For the past five years we at Zogby International have had the 
	opportunity to poll regularly and extensively in countries across the Arab 
	world. Some of our polls that have generated the greatest attention have 
	been those that have focused on what Arabs think about America: our people, 
	products, values, and our policies that affect their region. Equally 
	significant, however, have been our groundbreaking surveys of Arab values, 
	concerns, expectations, and needs. 
	
	5 Nation Survey of the Middle East (2006)
 Continuing Conflict in Iraq and Palestine Deepens U.S.-Arab Rift with 
	Growing Costs to Both Sides
 
 Results of the 2006 AAI/Zogby 
	International poll in 5 Arab countries show:
 
		Overall Arab attitudes toward U.S. have worsened; 
		negative attitudes have hardenedAttitudes toward U.S. policies in Iraq and 
		Palestine are to blameAttitudes toward American values, people and 
		culture have declined as wellUncertainty resulting from these two conflicts has 
		significantly dampened Arab confidence in prospects for economic 
		development and political stability 
	
	Arab Business Council: 6-Nation Survey (2006)
 Impact of Events on Economic Development
 
 Impact of Events on 
	Political Stability
 
 Better Off/Worse Off: vs. 4 Years Ago & vs. 4 
	Years From Now
 
 Reform, Opportunity and Issues
 
 Demographics
 
	
	Arab Gulf Business Leaders Look to the Future (2006)
 Significant developments are taking place in the Arab Gulf region. 
	Dramatic increases in oil revenues have spurred what some are calling an 
	“Arab Renaissance,” with record construction, investment, and growth 
	observed in many of the area’s countries. At the same time, some of the 
	region’s governments have taken new initiatives aimed at liberalizing their 
	economies and, in varying degrees, their political systems. All of these 
	positives, however, are occurring against the backdrop of worrisome 
	destabilizing developments, some in the broader region and others in the 
	Gulf itself.
 
	
	Poll Shows Bases for Unity in Lebanon (2005)
 Despite deep differences, which continue to divide the so-called 
	“opposition” and “loyalist” movements in Lebanon, there are some important 
	areas of agreement that could form the basis for national unity and 
	democratic reform in that country. This is one of the initial findings of a 
	new Zogby International/Information International poll taken in Lebanon 
	during the second week of April 2005.
 
	
	Rafic Hariri Assassination (2005)
 The continuing signs 
	of ferment in evidence in the streets of Beirut are being heralded in the US 
	as signs that “another Middle East domino is falling.” The Bush 
	Administration has been quick to latch on to the demonstrations as a 
	validation of the President’s democracy campaign.
 
 But as horrific as 
	the assassination of former Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri was and as inspiring 
	as the mass mobilization of the “cedar revolution” has been, the 
	demonstrations don’t tell the whole story of what is happening in Lebanon 
	today. A recent poll of 1,250 Lebanese, representing all religious groupings 
	in the country, establishes that while an emerging consensus exists on some 
	questions, on several key issues a deep sectarian divide still plagues the 
	country. And these issues must be tended to if Lebanon’s unity and internal 
	security are to be insured. The poll was conducted during the last week in 
	February 2005 by a Lebanese polling firm, Information International, in 
	conjunction with Zogby International.
 
	
	Attitudes of Arabs (2005)
 An In-Depth Look at Social and 
	Political Concerns of Arabs
 
 Arabs are looking more inward today, 
	focusing on issues close to home and self-identifying more with their 
	countries. And despite concerns with employment, most Arabs are quite 
	optimistic about their future. These are some of the results of a new Zogby 
	International poll conducted in the last half of October 2005. Commissioned 
	by Young Arab Leaders, a Dubai based group, but supported, as well, by the 
	Arab American Institute, the poll surveyed 3,900 Arabs from Morocco, Egypt, 
	Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Lebanon, and Jordan.
 
	
	Arabs Want Reform, U.S. Help in Solving Israel-Palestine Crisis 
	(2004)
 A new survey commissioned by the Arab American 
	Institute of Arab public opinion asked respondents to evaluate the 
	importance of ten different reform issues and then to indicate how helpful 
	they felt the U.S. could be in assisting their countries achieve each of 
	those reforms. The poll surveyed attitudes of 2,600 adult Arabs in Morocco, 
	Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Lebanon, and the United Arab Emirates and was 
	conducted by Zogby International.
 
 Respondents listed the following 
	issues as most important in rank order: expanding employment, settlement of 
	the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, improving healthcare, and increasing 
	access to education. Internal reform including curbing extremism and 
	expanding civil rights were of moderate importance while democratic reform, 
	women's rights, and increasing political debate were at the bottom of the 
	list.
 
	
	Impressions of America (2004) In June 2004, Zogby International surveyed almost 3,300 Arabs living in 
	Morocco, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Lebanon, the United Arab Emirates and Egypt.The poll was commissioned by the Arab American Institute as a follow-up to 
	the 2002 “Impressions of America” study. Questions in this second 
	“Impressions of America” poll focused on how Arabs view America and how 
	Arabs learn about America.
 
	
	The First Poll of Iraqi Public Opinion (2003)
 Zogby International conducted interviews of 600 adults chosen at random with 
	consideration of ethnic backgrounds, gender, religion and social class, 
	throughout locations in Iraq. Interviews were conducted August 3-19, 2003 in 
	Basra, Karkouk, Mousel and Al Ramadi. The ethnic groups (Arabs, Kurds, 
	Turkaman, and Assyrians) were interviewed, in addition to the religious 
	groups (Shiaa, Sunni and Christians). Interviewers traveled to public places 
	(shopping areas and coffee shops) chosen from different social 
	neighborhoods. The survey's margin of sampling error is +/- 4.1%.
 
	
	Ten Nation Impressions of America (2002)
 In the 
	aftermath of the September 11 attacks, Americans became painfully aware of 
	the gap in understanding between our world and much of the Arab world. Front 
	page headlines and newsmagazine cover stories asked “why do they hate us?’ 
	Pundits and scholars across the ideological spectrum offered answers that 
	ranged from the serious to the silly. Some suggested that the behavior of 
	the attackers was not aberrant, but characteristic of Islam and its 
	followers. They suggested that the West and Islam are not only different, 
	but are inevitably headed toward a clash. Others suggested that “they” hate 
	our democratic values, our superpower status, our wealth, and our people. 
	Still others noted that it was our policy of unquestioning support for 
	Israel, our denial of Palestinian rights, and our collaboration with 
	authoritarian regimes in the Middle East that was behind “their” alienation 
	from “us”.
 
	
	Arabs: What They Believe and What They Value Most (2002)
 The idea for this study came during a conversation with a prominent Arab 
	thinker. We were discussing the profound gap in understanding between the 
	U.S. and the Arab world that had become so painfully apparent following 
	Sept. 11, 2001. We noted how, in an effort to bridge this gap, the U.S. had 
	launched a public diplomacy campaign to help the Arab world better 
	understand the American reality and the American people.
 Related Material: 
	
	
	Arab Broadcasters Raise the Bar - May 07, 2007
	 
	
	Gulf Business 
	Leaders: Optimistic but Concerned 
	- March 6, 2006  
	What Arabs Think 
	About Other Countries in the World - December 9, 2002 
	
	What Do Arabs Think About? - November 4, 2002
	 
	Measuring Arab 
	Public Opinion - July 30, 2001
	 
	Israeli Attitudes 
	Towards Sharon, Israel, Arabs and Peace - May 21, 2001
	 
	Israeli Voters and 
	Peace - February 5, 2001
	 
	U.S.-Lebanon 
	Relationship: The Rebuilding That Must Be Done - September 6, 1999 
	Arab States Gain in 
	U.S. Public Opinion - February 22, 1999 
	back to top Arab American Opinion 
	Polls
	
	Arab American Voters in 2010: Their Identity and Political Concerns The Arab American Institute commissioned Zogby International to conduct a 
	telephone poll of 404 Arab Americans nationwide. Samples were randomly drawn 
	over national cds using Zogby International's list of Arab surnames. Zogby 
	International surveys employ sampling strategies in which selection 
	probabilities are proportional to population size within area codes and 
	exchanges. Up to six calls are made to reach a sampled phone number. 
	Cooperation rates are calculated using one of AAPOR’s approved methodologies 
	and are comparable to other professional public opinion surveys conducted 
	using similar sampling strategies.2 Weighting by country of origin, 
	religion, born in US, age, party, gender is used to adjust for non-response. 
	The margin of error is +/- 5.0 percentage points. Margins of error are 
	higher in sub-groups. 
	
	The Doha Debates: Should the U.S. Get Tough with Israel (2009) On Monday, May 18, 2009 commentators John Zogby, 
	President and CEO of Zogby International, and James Zogby, 
	President of the Arab American Institute, joined respondent Amjad 
	Atallah and moderator Farah Stockman to discuss 
	the results of a recent poll that reveals a deep partisan divide over the 
	path towards Middle East peace. 
	
	The 2008 Election: How Arab Americans Will Vote and Why Zogby International conducted an omnibus telephone poll of Arab Americans 
	nationwide between September 8th and September 13th, 2008. 
	
	The 2008 Election: The Arab American Vote
 Zogby 
	International conducted an omnibus telephone poll of likely Arab American 
	voters between October 10 and october 15, 2008.
 
 The target sample is 
	504 interviews with approximately 41 questions asked. Samples are randomly 
	drawn over national congressional districts using Zogby International's list 
	of Arab surnames in conjunction with a purchased surname list. Zogby 
	International surveys employ sampling strategies in which selection 
	probabilities are proportional to population size within area codes and 
	exchanges.
 
	
	Defining the Arab American Vote (2007)
 A plurality of 
	Arab Americans identify as Democrats (39%) while over a quarter identify as 
	Republicans (26%), and 28% say they are independent. The Democratic Party 
	receives a plurality of support across all demographic subgroups, especially 
	young, Catholic, and Orthodox voters.
 
	
	Seeing Eye to Eye: A Survey of Jewish American and Arab American 
	Public Opinion (2007) In 2002, Americans for Peace Now (APN) and the Arab American Institute 
	(AAI) commissioned Zogby International (ZI) to conduct the first ever 
	side-by-side poll of Jewish and Arab American public opinion to gauge 
	support within both communities for Arab-Israeli peace. With the region's 
	political landscape significantly altered since the first poll was 
	conducted—including the US war in Iraq, Israel's disengagement fromGaza, 
	Hamas' victory in Palestinian legislative elections, and the 2006 
	Israel-Lebanon war—APN and AAI commissioned ZI in May 2007 to reexamine 
	Jewish and Arab American public opinion. 
	
	The Arab American Vote in 2004
 Poll of Arab 
	American Voters in Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Florida
 
 Zogby 
	International interviewed 500 Arab American registered voters, who had 
	indicated a likelihood of voting on November 2. The poll has a margin of 
	error of +/_ 4.5%. The voters came from four states (MI, OH, PA, FL), 
	reflecting the overall demographic profile of the national Arab American 
	community.
 
	
	AAI/APN Survey of Jewish American and Arab American Public Opinion 
	(2003) This survey was conducted by Zogby International. The Jewish American 
	segment was completed on 7/6/03 and totaled 503 individuals. The Arab 
	American segment was completed on 7/9/03 and totaled 500 individuals. In 
	both samples, the margin of error was +/- 4.5%. 
	
	Profiling and Pride: Arab American Attitudes and Behavior Since 
	September 11 (2002) In May 2002, the Arab American Institute Foundation (AAIF) commissioned a 
	survey of Arab American attitudes and behavior since September 11. The May 
	survey is compared to a similarpoll commissioned by AAIF in October 
	2001, in the immediate aftermath of the terror attacks. On some variables a 
	three-way comparison is made, including findings of a survey of Arab 
	American attitudes taken in 2000.
 
	
	Arab American Attitudes & the September 11 Attacks (2001) Arab Americans are proud and committed Americans, who give strong support 
	to President Bush's efforts to combat the terrorists who struck the United 
	States. At the same time, Arab Americans are very concerned about the 
	backlash that occurred after the September 11 terrorist attacks.The 
	community, however, has remained committed to its beliefs and heritage. These are some of the results of a Zogby International (ZI) poll of Arab 
	American attitudes commissioned by the Arab American Institute (AAI).The 
	ZI/AAI poll surveyed 508 randomly selected Arab Americans from October 8-10 
	and had a margin of error of +4.5%.The poll results can be grouped under 
	three main headings. 
	
	What Ethnic Americans Really Think (2001)
 We 
	begin with a simple observation—America is a complex society. We are a 
	nation of many diverse groups, each with different backgrounds and 
	experiences. We do not all see life and its many issues in the same way. 
	Shaped by our unique perspectives, we have a variety of beliefs and 
	attitudes. For some of us, our race, ethnicity or religion is a determining 
	factor that molds our general outlook or our views on specific issues. For 
	others, it may be our income, education or age. On some issues, we make 
	different assessments based on our gender or our marital status.
 
	
	Arab Americans: Issues, Attitudes and Views (2000)
 Until recently, the establishment of Arab Americans as an organized 
	political constituency had been, for the most part, in a formative process. 
	This year, however, Arab Americans have arrived as an independent-minded and 
	highly motivated political force with a common agenda.
 
	
	The Arab American Vote: 1996-2002
 Zogby 
	International surveyed 500 Arab American voters during the last week of 
	October 2002. The poll, commissioned by the Arab American Institute, has a 
	margin of error of +/-4.5%.
 Related Material:
 
	The U.S. and the World - January 7, 2002 
	New Poll Shows Damage Done - December 24, 2001 
	U.S.-Lebanon Relationship: The Rebuilding That Must Be Done - September 
	6, 1999 back to top American Opinion Polls
	
	American Opinions on the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict (2010) More than four-in-five Americans (81%) agree the Israeli-Palestinian 
	conflict has a negative impact on U.S. interests, including a majority of 
	both Democrats (88%) and Republicans (77%), a new Arab American Institute/Zogby 
	Interactive survey finds. While Americans agree the conflict has a negative 
	impact, they are split about how to deal with the situation. Fifty percent 
	of Americans agree the Obama Administration should steer a middle course in 
	pursuing peace in the Middle East.  
	
	 
	
	American Views on Arab and Muslim Americans (2010) Zogby International was commissioned by Dr. James Zogby to conduct an 
	online survey of 2100 adults. A sampling of Zogby International's online 
	panel, which is representative of the adult population of the US, was 
	invited to participate. Slight weights were added to region, party, age, 
	race, religion, gender, education to more accurately reflect the population. 
	The margin of error is +/- 2.2 percentage points. Margins of error are 
	higher in sub-groups. The MOE calculation is for sampling error only. 
	
	Attitudes of U.S Voters Toward Saudi Arabia (2003)
 Poll surveys American opinion on the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, compares 
	data from similar surveys done in past years.
 
	
	
 Attitudes of the American Public Toward the Recent Arab-Israeli Dispute 
	(2002)
 
 Zogby International conducted interviews of 1,005 likely voters chosen at 
	random, nationwide. Conducted from April 2 to 4, the poll surveyed opinion 
	on the Arab Israel conflict. Margin of error is +/- 3.2%. 
	
	U.S. Attitudes Toward Arab Countries and the Israeli-Palestinian 
	Conflict (2000) American voters are demonstrating an increasingly favorable attitude 
	toward Arab countries. Commissions by Abu Dhabi Television and AAI the poll 
	interviewed 1012 randomly selected U.S. voters from December 18 to 21, 2000. 
	The poll has a margin of error of +/- 3.2%. 
	
	U.S Public Opinion Supports Palestinian Right to Return (2000) American voters support the implementation of Palestinian rights in any 
	future Middle East peace agreement. A survey of 890 likely voters 
	nation-wide shows 66 percent of Americans support the Palestinians right to 
	independent statehood - with only 13 percent opposed.  
	
	Al-Majallah/AAI Poll (1998) On April 3, 1998, 81 U.S. Senators (out of 100) sent a letter to U.S. 
	President Bill Clinton insisting that he not use public pressure against 
	Israel in an effort to break the impasse in the Middle East peace process. A recent poll of U.S. voters, however, demonstrates that this one-sided 
	view held by the U.S. Congress is totally out of touch with U.S. public 
	opinion on Middle East issues. The poll, commissioned by Al Majallah Magazine and the Arab American 
	Institute (AAI) of Washington, D.C., was conducted by the New York firm of 
	Zogby International. From April 19 to April 22 1998 the Al Majallah/AAI poll 
	interviewed 969 randomly selected U.S. voters. The poll’s findings have a 
	margin of error of +- 3.3 percent.   
	
	Nationwide Poll of U.S. Voters on Attitudes Toward Crisis in The 
	Middle East Peace Process (1997) U.S. Public Opinion is overwhelmingly decided that Israel Should "stop 
	building the new settlement (at Jabal Abu Ghnaim) and restart peace talks 
	with the Palestinians. This poll was conducted for As Sharq Al Awsat and AAI 
	by Zogby International.  
	
	
 Dole’s Jerusalem Effort Receives Little Public Support 
	(1995)
 The AAI Poll conducted by the John Zogby Group of New York was the first 
	such survey of U.S. public opinion attitudes towards the status of 
	Jerusalem. The poll surveyed 900 registered voters from July 17 to 20, 1995 
	and had a margin of error of +/- 3.3% Related Material:
 
	
	Arab and U.S. Public Opinion Show Similar Concerns on Iraq War - April 
	09, 2007   
 
 
 |