| 
 Al-Jazeerah History
 
 Archives
 
 Mission & Name
 
 Conflict Terminology
 
 Editorials
 
 Gaza Holocaust
 
 Gulf War
 
 Isdood
 
 Islam
 
 News
 
 News Photos
 
 Opinion 
	
	
	Editorials
 
 US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)
 
 www.aljazeerah.info
 
	  
           |  | 
 Shifting Truths in Sinai:  Israel Stands to Gain from the Carnage  By Ramzy Baroud Al-Jazeerah, CCUN, August 14, 2012 
 Two Toyota Land Cruisers filled with about 15 well-built gunmen 
	in ski masks and all-black outfits appear seemingly out of nowhere. Behind 
	them is vast, open desert. They approach a group of soldiers huddled around 
	a simple meal as they prepare to break their Ramadan fast. The gunmen open 
	fire, leaving the soldiers with no chance of retrieving their weapons.
 
 This is not an opening scene of a Hollywood action movie. The massacre 
	actually took place at an Egyptian military post in northern Sinai on August 
	5. The description above was conveyed by a witness, Eissa Mohamed Salama, in 
	a statement made to The Associated Press (AP; Aug 8). The gunmen were well 
	trained. Their overt confidence can only be explained by the fact that "one 
	militant got out a camera and filmed the bodies of the soldiers".
 
 One is immediately baffled by this. Why would the masked militants wish to 
	document the killings if they were about to embark on what can be considered 
	a suicide mission in Israel? "The gunmen then approached the Israeli 
	border," with two vehicles, one reportedly a stolen Egyptian armored 
	personnel carrier. The British Broadcasting Corp, citing Israeli officials, 
	reported that one of the vehicles "exploded on the frontier", while the 
	other broke through the Israeli border, "travelled about 2 kilometers into 
	Israel before being disabled by the Israeli air force" (BBC News Online, Aug 
	7). According to the BBC report, citing Israeli sources, there were about 35 
	gunmen in total, all clad in traditional Bedouin attire.
 
 Their 
	mission into Israel was suicidal, since, unlike in Sinai, they had nowhere 
	to escape. But who would embark on such a logistically complex mission, 
	document it on camera, and then fail to take responsibility for it? The 
	brazen attack seemed to have little military wisdom, but it did possess a 
	sinister political logic.
 
 Only 48 hours before the attack, the media 
	were awash with reports about the return of electricity in the Gaza Strip. 
	The impoverished Strip's generators have not run at full capacity for about 
	six years, since Hamas was elected. The Israeli siege and subsequent wars 
	killed and wounded thousands, but they failed to bend Gaza's political will. 
	For Gazans, the keyword to their survival in the face of Israel's blockade 
	was "Egypt".
 
 The Egyptian revolution on January 25, 2011, carried a 
	multitude of meanings for all sectors of Egyptian society, and the Middle 
	East at large. For Palestinians in Gaza, it heralded the possibility of a 
	lifeline. The nearly 1,000 tunnels dug to assist in Gaza's survival would 
	amount to nothing compared with a decisive Egyptian decision to end the 
	siege by opening the Rafah border.
 
 In fact, a decision was taking 
	place in stages. Hamas, which governs Gaza, was a branch of Egypt's Muslim 
	Brotherhood. The latter is now the leading political force in the country 
	and, despite the military's obduracy, it has managed to claim the country's 
	presidency as well.
 
 In late July, a high-level Hamas delegation met 
	in Cairo. All the stress and trepidation of the last 16 months seemed to 
	have come to an end, as Hamas chief Khaled Mashaal, his deputy Musa Abu 
	Marzouq and other members of the group's politburo met with President 
	Mohammed Morsi. Egypt's official news agency reported Morsi's declarations 
	of full support "for the Palestinian nation's struggle to achieve its 
	legitimate rights". According to Reuters, Morsi's top priority was achieving 
	unity "between Hamas and Fatah, supplying Gaza with fuel and electricity and 
	easing the restrictions on the border crossing between Gaza and Egypt".
 
 Juxtapose that scene - where a historical milestone has finally been reached 
	- with an Agence France-Presse photo of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin 
	Netanyahu and his defense minister, Ehud Barak, standing triumphantly next 
	to a burned Egyptian vehicle that was reportedly stolen by the Sinai gunmen. 
	The message here is that only Israel is serious about fighting terror. 
	Israeli newspaper Haaretz' accompanying article started with this 
	revelation: "Israel shared some of the intelligence it received with the 
	Egyptian army prior to the incident, but there is no evidence Egypt acted on 
	the information." This was meant to humiliate Egypt's military further.
 
 Naturally, Israel blamed Gaza, even though there is no material evidence to 
	back such accusations. Some in Egypt's media jumped on the opportunity to 
	blame Gaza for Egypt's security problems in Sinai as well. The loudest among 
	them were completely silent when, on August 18, 2011, Israel killed six 
	Egyptian soldiers in Sinai.
 
 Then, Israel carried out a series of 
	strikes against Gaza, killing and wounding many, while claiming that Gaza 
	was a source of attacks against Israeli civilians. Later the Israeli media 
	dismissed the connection as flawed. No apologies for the Gaza deaths, of 
	course, and AP, Reuters and others are still blaming Palestinians for the 
	attack near Eilat last year. Then, Palestinian factions opted not to 
	escalate to spare Egypt an unwanted conflict with Israel during a most 
	sensitive transition.
 
 None of that seems relevant now. Egypt is busy 
	destroying the tunnels, continuing efforts that were funded by the US a few 
	years ago. It also closed the Gaza-Egypt crossing, and is being "permitted" 
	by Israel to use attack helicopters in Sinai to hunt for elusive terrorists. 
	Within days, Gaza's misfortunes were multiplied and once more Palestinians 
	are pleading their case.
 
 Israeli officials and analysts are, of 
	course, beside themselves with anticipation. The opportunity is simply too 
	great not to be utilized fully. Commenting in Egypt-based OnIslam, 
	Abdelrahman Rashdan wrote that according to the Israeli intelligence 
	scenario, "Iranians, Palestinians, Egyptians, and al-Qaeda operatives all 
	moved from Lebanon to attack Egypt [and] Israel and defend Syria."
 
 In Western mainstream media, few asked who benefits from all of this - from 
	once more isolating Gaza, shutting down the tunnels, severing 
	Egyptian-Palestinian ties, embroiling the Egyptian military in a security 
	nightmare in Sinai, and much more.
 
 The Muslim Brotherhood website 
	had an answer. It suggested that the incident "can be attributed to the 
	Mossad". True, some Western media reported the statement, but not with any 
	degree of seriousness or due analysis. The BBC even offered its own context: 
	"Conspiracy theories are popular across the Arab world," ending the 
	discussion with an Israeli dismissal of the accusation as "nonsense". Case 
	closed. But it shouldn't be.
 
 Before embarking on a wild goose chase 
	in Sinai, urgent questions must be asked and answered. Haphazard action will 
	only make things worse for Egypt, Palestine and Sinai's long-neglected 
	Bedouin population.
 
 - Ramzy Baroud (www.ramzybaroud.net) 
	is an internationally-syndicated columnist and the editor of 
	PalestineChronicle.com. His latest book is My Father Was a Freedom Fighter: 
	Gaza's Untold Story (Pluto Press, London.)
 
 
 |  |  |