| 
 Al-Jazeerah History
 
 Archives
 
 Mission & Name
 
 Conflict Terminology
 
 Editorials
 
 Gaza Holocaust
 
 Gulf War
 
 Isdood
 
 Islam
 
 News
 
 News Photos
 
 Opinion 
	
	
	Editorials
 
 US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)
 
 www.aljazeerah.info
 
	  
           |  | 
 What Marwan Barghouti Really Means to 
	  Palestinians  By Ramzy Baroud Al-Jazeerah, CCUN, April 9, 2012  
 Last week Marwan Barghouti, the prominent Palestinian political 
	prisoner and Fatah leader, called on Palestinians to launch a “large-scale 
	popular resistance” which would “serve the cause of our people.”
 
 The message was widely disseminated as it coincided with Land Day, an event 
	that has unified Palestinians since March 1976. Its meaning has morphed 
	through the years to represent the collective grievances shared by most 
	Palestinians, including dispossession from their land as a result of Israeli 
	occupation.
 
 Barghouti is also a unifying figure among Palestinians. 
	Even at the height of the Hamas-Fatah clashes in 2007, he insisted on unity 
	and shunned factionalism. It is no secret that Barghouti is still a very 
	popular figure in Fatah, to the displeasure of various Fatah leaders, not 
	least Mahmoud Abbas, who heads both the Palestinian Authority and Fatah.. 
	Throughout its indirect prisoners exchange talks with Israel, Hamas insisted 
	on Barghouti’s release. Israel, which had officially charged and imprisoned 
	Barghouti in 2004 for five alleged counts of murder – but more likely 
	because of his leading role in the Second Palestinian Intifada - insisted 
	otherwise.
 
 Israel held onto Barghouti largely because of his broad 
	appeal among Palestinians. In late 2009, he told Milan-based Corriere Della 
	Sera that “the main issue topping his agenda currently is achieving unity 
	between rival Palestinian factions” (as quoted in Haaretz, November 25, 
	2009). More, he claimed that following a unity deal he would be ready to 
	submit candidacy for Palestinian presidency. Barghouti, is, of course, still 
	in prison. Although a unity deal has been signed, it is yet to be 
	actualized.
 
 Barghouti’s latest statement is clearly targeting the 
	political class that has ruled Palestinians for many years, and is now 
	merely managing and profiting from the occupation. “Stop marketing the 
	illusion that there is a possibility of ending the occupation and achieving 
	a state through negotiations after this vision has failed miserably,” he 
	said. “It is the Palestinian people's right to oppose the occupation in all 
	means, and the resistance must be focused on the 1967 territories” (BBC, 
	March 27).
 
 Last December, Jospeh Dana wrote, “Barghouti is a figure 
	of towering reverence among Palestinians and even some Israelis, regardless 
	of political persuasion.” However he did not earn his legitimacy among 
	Palestinians through his prophetic political views or negotiation skills. In 
	fact, he was among the Fatah leaders who hopelessly, although genuinely 
	pursued peace through the ‘peace process’ – which proved costly, if not 
	lethal to the Palestinian national movement. Dana wrote, “Barghouti's 
	pragmatic approach to peace during the 1990s demonstrated his overarching 
	desire to end Israeli occupation at all costs” (The National, Dec 23, 2011).
 
 Although his latest message has articulated a conclusion that became 
	obvious to most Palestinians – for example, that “it must be understood that 
	there is no partner for peace in Israel when the settlements have doubled.” 
	– Barghouti’s call delineates a level of political maturity that is unlikely 
	to go down well, whether in Ramallah or Tel Aviv.
 
 So it’s not his 
	political savvy per se that made him popular among Palestinians, but the 
	fact that he stands as the antithesis of traditional Fatah and PA 
	leadership. Starting his political career at the age of 15, before being 
	imprisoned and deported to Jordan in his early 20s, Barghouti was viewed 
	among Fatah youth – the Shabibah – as the desired new face of the movement. 
	When he realized that the ‘peace process’ was a sham, intended to win time 
	for Israeli land confiscation and settlements and reward a few accommodating 
	Palestinians, Barghouti broke away from the Fatah echelons. Predictably, it 
	was also then, in 2001, that Israel tried to assassinate him.
 
 Marwan Barghouti still has some support in Israel itself, specifically among 
	the politically sensible who understand that Netanyahu’s rightwing 
	government cannot reach a peaceful resolution, and that the so-called 
	two-state solution is all but dead. In a Haaretz editorial entitled ‘Listen 
	to Marwan Barghouti,’ the authors discussed how  “back when he was a 
	peace-loving, popular leader who had not yet turned to violence, Barghouti 
	made the rounds of Israeli politicians, opinion-makers and the central 
	committees of the Zionist parties and urged them to reach an agreement with 
	the Palestinians.” The authors recommended that ‘Jerusalem’ listen to 
	Barghouti because he “is the most authentic leader Fatah has produced and he 
	can lead his people to an agreement” (March 30).
 
 In his article 
	entitled ‘The New Mandela’, Uri Avnery wrote that Barghouti “is one of the 
	very few personalities around whom all Palestinians, Fatah as well as Hamas, 
	can unite” (Counterpunch, March 30). However, it is essential that a 
	conscious separation is made between how Barghouti is interpreted by the 
	Palestinians themselves and Israelis (even those in the left). Among the 
	latter, Barghouti is presented as a figure who might have been involved in 
	the “murderous terror” of the second Intifada (Haaretz) but who can also 
	“lead his people to an agreement” - as if Palestinians are reckless 
	multitudes desperate for their own Mandela who is capable, through his 
	natural leadership skills, of uniting them into signing another document.
 
 For years, but especially after the Oslo peace process, successive 
	Israeli governments and officials have insisted that there was “no one to 
	talk to on the Palestinian side.” The tired assertion was meant to justify 
	Israel’s unilateral policies, including settlement construction. However 
	Barghouti is a treasured leader in the eyes of many Palestinians not because 
	he is the man that Israel can talk to, and not because of any stereotypical 
	undertones of him being a ‘strong man’ who can lead the unruly Arabs. Nor 
	can his popularity be attributed to his political savvy or the prominence of 
	his family.
 
 Throughout the years, hundreds of Palestinians been 
	targeted in extrajudicial assassinations; hundreds were deported and 
	thousands continued to be imprisoned. Marwan Barghouti is a representation 
	of all of them and more, and it’s because of this legacy that his messages 
	matters, and greatly so. In his latest message, Barghouti said that the 
	Palestinian Authority should immediately halt “all co-ordination with Israel 
	- economic and security - and work toward Palestinian reconciliation,” 
	rather than another peace agreement.
 
 Most Palestinians already 
	agree.
 
 - Ramzy Baroud (www.ramzybaroud.net) 
	is an internationally-syndicated columnist and the editor of 
	PalestineChronicle.com. His latest book is My Father Was a Freedom Fighter: 
	Gaza's Untold Story (Pluto Press, London).
 
 
 |  |  |