Al-Jazeerah History
Archives
Mission & Name
Conflict Terminology
Editorials
Gaza Holocaust
Gulf War
Isdood
Islam
News
News Photos
Opinion
Editorials
US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)
www.aljazeerah.info
|
|
Unchanging Obama Versus the Changing Arab
Landscape
By Mazin Qumsiyeh
Al-Jazeerah, CCUN, May 23, 2011
In follow-up to the very successful 15 May events (the beginning
of the global uprising), activists around the world called for a day of
protests Friday (tomorrow). In Bethlehem, we gather after Friday
prayers in front of Omar's mosque (the Nativity square) and march towards
the apartheid wall.
President Obama tried in his (Cairo II) speech to
again convince a skeptical world that the US promotes democracy and human
rights. We have heard all of this orientalist talk before and yet have seen
no action/change. The change is coming from the people waving
Palestinian and Egyptian flags everywhere. Even Obama’s rhetoric seems
hypocritical: why speak of peaceful demonstrations being suppressed in Syria
and Libya but not speak about the constant repression of demonstrators by
the Israeli apartheid regime? Obama even went further than other US
presidents and talked as a typical Zionist: he lectured us the native people
that we should stop "delegitimizing" Israel and accept it as "a Jewish
state", "for the Jewish people". Even Reagan who supporting apartheid
South Africa in his first term did not ask that we stop delegitimizing South
Africa and recognize it as a "White state" "for "the white people". What
about International law (not mentioned by Obama) and what about a state of
all its citizens (including the refugees who must be allowed to return to
their homes and lands)? No, these basic rights are to be removed and the
colonizers have a right to security but the colonized must be content to
live in a demilitarized ghetto and accept their dispossession.
Ronald
Reagan refused to speak to AIPAC. But Obama agreed. Reagan at least
pulled troops out of Lebanon while Obama still keeps his troops in both Iraq
and Afghanistan (and uses the verbal trick of “ending combat mission”).
Obama will also host war criminals at the White house and Netanyahu (the
gang leader) will address the (Israeli-occupied) congress. No mention will
be made of Israel's illegal use of US weaponry in war crimes and crimes
against humanity. Yet, the success of the popular uprisings in the Arab
world including the new uprising that started on 15 May in Palestine and two
scandals that hit the apartheid state this week add to the cracks in the
"Iron wall" (fortified by the US). In one scandal, Russia charged the
Israeli military attache working at the Israeli embassy with espionage and
expelled him. Russia and Turkey and many other countries previously friendly
to the apartheid regime have been changing. Israeli papers also
reported that Ron Arad, national security advisor to Netanyahu did not
actually resign voluntarily but was fired because he leaked "sensitive
information". The "sensitive" information was that the United States
had given Israel unequivocal guarantees that its "strategic capabilities" in
the nuclear field would be preserved and strengthened (according to Haaretz).
This put another nail in the coffin of the "change we can believe in" facade
and embarrassed Obama.
We should all write to the US media
immediately to demand balanced coverage of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu’s visit to the US. Netanyahu and Obama talk about threats
from Iran (like he did about Iraq getting us into a mess) and about Hamas's
refusal to recognize the apartheid state of Israel. It is fine to put
their views out there but why not allow the facts of how Israel's lobby
pushed for wars and that Israel is the largest recipient of US foreign aid
or that Netanyahu's own political party opposes a Palestinian state and
rejects international law (settlements are illegal and yet he even refuses
to suspend partially colonial activities so that negotiations can resume).
The Likud party platform clearly states: “The Government of Israel
flatly rejects the establishment of a Palestinian Arab state west of the
Jordan river.” It also refuses to recognize basic rights in Jerusalem
or for the refugees to be returned . For this racist platform, see
http://www.knesset.gov.il/elections/knesset15/elikud_m.htm or PDF:
http://bit.ly/likudplatform.
I think the Israeli government must first rid itself of all political
parties that refuse to recognize our rights as Palestinians or refuse to
shed racist preferences for Jews before we agree to negotiate with it.
The only official in the Obama administration who genuinely wanted
Israel to at least suspend its persistent violations of International law is
now out of the way (George Mitchell). Business thus goes on as usual
between the two governments supporting apartheid, repression, and violation
of International law. Obama will address the AIPAC convention saying
the same nonsense about Israeli security (security for a colonial racist
regime). Maybe his Zionist aids will not allow him to know that the US
public is demonstrating against this lobby. Maybe he thinks most
people don't care that Deputy Secretary of State James Steinberg and
assistant secretary of state for Near Eastern affairs Jeffrey Feltman are
two known Zionists and yet are leading a US delegation in an annual
strategic "dialogue" with Israel officials (headed by war criminal Danny
Ayalon).
The issue really is not about what these people do; they
are criminals and professional thugs who profit off of wars and conflict.
The issue is how many people in this land and around the world will join us
in the unfolding global uprising (intifada) to change our collective
situation towards peace with justice. Corrupt business at the highest level
that harms US public and strategic interests will not be changed by a speech
from Obama. We, the people of the US and the world must take matters into
our own hands. What Obama does not understand is that the millions who pour
into the streets do not buy his fake caring. To prove sincerity he
should start by cutting off aid to Israel until it complies with
International law and basic human rights.
The Zionist project has not
succeeded in its stated aim of full ethnic cleansing and transformation of
Palestine. While over two-thirds of the native Palestinians in the world
became refugees or displaced people, 5.5 million Palestinians remain
defiantly here. We faced over 130 years of a relentless assault against our
people. The assault was supported by European and other Western
Countries and aided and abetted by despotic rulers in the Arab world. Over
the past 20 years more and more people around the world have joined the
struggle for freedom from oppression and colonization. Obama failed to
revive the charade of a fake "peace process" whose only beneficiaries are
profiteers interested in liquidating Palestinian rights.
A
monumental transformation in the Arab world is happening and a global
intifada is spreading using tools like media work and boycotts, divestment,
and sanctions. The Palestine issue remains the torch for this global
transformation. More people in the West are shedding illusions about
what is really happening here in Palestine and in the rest of the Arab
world. As for us, the 400 million Arabs that Obama wants to befriend with
words, we will say with our feet and our bodies: the time for talk is done
and it is time for revolutions and real change. Yalla to the
streets Friday. La Luta Continua.
Mazin@Qumsiyeh.org In occupied
Palestine
http://popular-resistance.blogspot.com/2011/05/obama-and-changing-landscape.html
|
|
|