Editorial Note: The
following news reports are summaries from original sources. They may
also include corrections of Arabic names and political terminology.
Comments are in parentheses. |
When, Where the Pope Inspires No
Hope
By Nicola Nasser
ccun.org, May 7, 2009
Pope Benedict XVI is scheduled to be the third pontiff to
visit the Holy Land from 8 – 15 May, following in the footsteps of Paul
VI in 1964 and John Paul II in 2000, on a mission officially described
as a “pilgrimage” and one of “peace and reconciliation.”
However, the Pope will be stepping into “a diplomatic minefield,” where
the Catholic highest spiritual authority will be unmercifully
scrutinized by the protagonists of the one hundred year old Arab –
Israeli conflict for the Holy Father’s every step, word and handshake,
which would force him into the defensive in an impossible balancing act
that will rule out any hope his presence is supposed to inspire,
especially among the down-trodden Arabs of Palestine, whether those who
are “Israelis” living as second class citizens since 1948 or those
Palestinians living under the Israeli military occupation since 1967.
Even the pontiff’s own Catholic diminishing flock in the Holy Land
seems in controversy over the timing and the itinerary of his
pilgrimage. "We will ask him why he came, what he intends on saying …
and why he isn't coming to Gaza," Father Manuel Mussalam, the pastor of
the only Catholic church of about 300 believers in Gaza, out of 3000
Christians in the Israeli besieged Mediterranean strip, was quoted by
AFP as asking. "We'll tell him that this is not the right moment to come
and visit the holy places, while Jerusalem is occupied," Mussalam added.
In November 2006, long before Gaza Strip came under the control of
the Islamic movement Hamas, which is cited as the casus belli for the
Israeli latest three – week bloody and destructive war on Gaza as well
as for the nine – year old Israeli military blockade of 1.5 million
Palestinians since 2000, Father Mussalam described the situation there:
“Gaza cannot sleep! The people are suffering unbelievably. They are
hungry, thirsty, have no electricity or clean water. They are suffering
constant bombardments and sonic booms from low flying aircraft… They
have no income, no opportunities to get food and water from outside and
no opportunities to secure money inside of Gaza. They have no hope and
no love. These actions are War Crimes!"
Vindicating Mussalam’s
statement, the World Bank reported on April 24 that a serious
environmental threat is evolving in Gaza where only one tenth of water
meets the world health standards, a fact that is responsible for a
quarter of the disease cases, and creating a water crisis similar to
that in Sudan and Congo.
Nonetheless, the Holy See is determined
to rule out Gaza from the Pope’s itinerary. In a recent letter to the
Vatican 40 prominent Christians from the occupied Palestinian
territories appealed to the Holy See to add Gaza to his itinerary. They
could not understand how the Pope has been to Auschwitz to pray for the
people murdered there, “as a duty to truth and to those that suffered,"
as he said, but could not similarly heal the wounds of those who are
still suffering in Gaza.
The Vatican cites security reasons,
according to the spokesman of the Apostolic Nuncio to Israel, Father
Peter Madros. Israel recently barred the Apostolic Nuncio, Archbishop
Antonio Franco, from Gaza. But security did not prevent Ban Ki-moon, the
UN Secretary General from visiting Gaza when the guns were still
smoking, nor did it prevent Sinn Fein leader Gerry Adams, to name only a
few.
The Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem, Archbishop Fouad Twal, in
an interview provided by the Franciscan Custody of the Holy Land and
published by Zenit.org on April 22, acknowledged that the Pope’s trip
has undoubtedly a “political dimension”: “We mustn't fool ourselves:
there is 100% a political dimension … everything will have a political
connotation. Here we breathe politics, our oxygen is politics.” But Twal
has three explanations. First, “it is difficult to find a good balance
and to maintain it.” Second, “imagine the negative consequences it would
have on the pilgrimage industry, if the Pope himself was afraid of
coming on pilgrimage.” Third, “what should be done? Wait for better
times … until the Palestinian question is resolved? I'm afraid that two
or three Sovereign Pontiffs will pass before it is definitively
settled.”
The three reasons Twal cited are shocking, but his
conclusion devastates whatever hope the papal visit might inspire: “The
more the Vatican is a friend of Israel, the more it will be able to draw
profit,” otherwise, “we will all lose, we Christians and we Arabs”!
When His Holiness is to meet on April 14 with Israel's Prime Minister
Benjamin Netanyahu, who has dispelled all hopes for even the resumption
of a peace process, let alone peace, both by his on-record political
platform as well as by the composition of his extreme right ruling
coalition, and when he will meet with Israeli President Shimon Peres in
Jerusalem, the spiritual capital of Christianity and Islam which his
Israeli hosts are determined to Judaise as theirs only eternal capital,
and to visit the Yad Vashem Holocaust Memorial in Jerusalem, the Islamic
Al-Buraq Wall as the Jewish Western (Wailing) Wall of the Temple, and
when Israel forces his protocol team to drop from the list of his Arab
audience in Nazareth the Palestinian mayor of Sukhnin, Mazen Ghanaim,
because he rallied against the Israeli war on Gaza, then the itinerary
of his pilgrimage could be described as anything but being apolitically
balanced when Gaza is ruled out.
In his Easter message on April
12, Benedict XVI noted the world food shortage, the financial turmoil,
the old and new forms of poverty, the disturbing climate change, the
violence and deprivation, “the ever present threat of terrorism,” to
conclude that, “it is urgent to rediscover grounds for hope,” and urged
his audience to spread the kind of hope that inspires courage to do good
even when it costs dearly. But his oversight that did not make him
mention military occupation and the long standing refugee problem
emanating therefrom, as it is the case in Palestine, to where he is
heading as a pilgrim, dispels any hope that he will say, let alone do,
anything that would inspire hope.
*Nicola Nasser is a veteran
Arab journalist based in Bir Zeit, West Bank of the Israeli – occupied
Palestinian territories.
Fair Use
Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the
use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this
constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for
in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
Section 107, the material on this site is
distributed without profit to those
who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information
for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of
your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
copyright owner.