Netanyahu's New Quest:
The Game is On
By Ramzy Baroud
ccun.org, June 7, 2009
“We've accomplished quite a few things, and I think the most
important one is to cement the principle that the path to peace is
through negotiations and not through violence.”
These were the
‘encouraging’ words modestly uttered by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu, during a joint press conference with the US president. The
President was then Bill Clinton, and the date was October 2, 1996.
In the occupied Palestinian territories, the situation then seemed
incredibly grim. But there was no Israeli wall. The settlements were
smaller in size and in population. Gaza was besieged, but not to the
point of total suffocation.
Recently, Prime Minister
Netanyahu paid a highly anticipated visit to the White House, on May 18,
2009, this time meeting with Barack Obama.
“I share with you
very much the desire to move the peace process forward. And I want to
start peace negotiations with the Palestinians. I would like to broaden
the circle of peace to include others in the Arab world,” said
One need not emphasize the harm inflicted upon the
Palestinian people during those years. The violence, which Netanyahu
seemingly decried in ’96, visited Palestinians countless times. Starting
December 27, 2008 and for 22 frightening days, much of Gaza was
decimated by the Israeli army, using US weapons, killing and wounding
thousands. There is now a giant wall, hundreds of miles in length,
snaking around the West Bank, separating Palestinians from their land,
livelihoods and any possibility of a true statehood. There are Jewish
settlements, joined by Jewish-only roads that hopelessly fragment the
occupied West Bank. They all are illegal under international law, as is
the so-called Separation Wall, as are the brutal attacks and siege on
Gaza, as is the Israeli military occupation altogether.
told that Obama is serious about peace in the Middle East. He maybe is.
But even such assumed seriousness might not be able to change the
disturbing pattern that forced Clinton before him, according to former
top Middle East Advisor, Aaron David Miller, to utter the following
words: "Who the f*** does he think he is? Who's the f***ing superpower
In recent meetings between the two leaders, Obama
clearly highlighted his country’s commitment to a Palestinian state,
and, surprisingly, made mention of “Gaza” during the press conference.
But the words of praise of Israel’s greatness were at an all time high.
“Obama talked about the ‘extraordinary relationship [with Israel], the
special relationship ...the stalwart ally ... the historical ties,
emotional ties [and] the only democracy in the Middle East ... a source
of admiration and inspiration for the American people’,” observed
commentator George Hishmeh.
Following his meeting with Obama,
Netanyahu made a visit to the US Congress, where he conferred with the
"great friends of Israel". On his visit to Capitol Hill, he met House
Speaker Nancy Pelosi and House Minority Leader John Boehner. The Israeli
leader also met members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and
Jewish legislators. He was given the same exceptional treatment enjoying
by other Israeli leaders. Committee chairman Senator John Kerry was
"encouraged by a number of things" Netanyahu had said. Following meeting
with Congressional leaders, Netanyahu observed, as if breaking some
unexpected news: there is "an American consensus" regarding "the special
relationship we have between Israel and the United States".
game is on. Netanyahu will once again try to overwhelm the President of
the United States by rallying the Congress behind him in preparation for
any possible confrontation with Obama’s administration. Obama, on the
other hand, will attempt, however bashfully, to assert a new direction
in US foreign policy – through tempting Israel by embracing harsher Iran
policies and pressuring the Arabs to normalize with the Jewish state in
exchange for Israel’s mere promise of moving the peace process forward.
In 1996, Netanyahu spoke of the immediate danger facing Israel, in
reference to Iraq. Now Iraq – which had no weapons of mass destruction,
after all - is no longer an “existential threat” to the state of Israel.
And now the Israeli leader has set his sights on Iran. “The
challenge is the potential arming of Iran with nuclear weapons
capabilities. That is a great danger to all of us .. We have to do this
in tandem .. I was very encouraged to learn that this is the American
policy. We're going to try to do it together, because if we do it
together we'll get a lot further, a lot faster."
It might not
take thirteen more years before Netanyahu’s wishes come true, before
getting a lot further, a lot faster, i.e. unleashing a war against Iran.
But mark my words, Netanyahu, as well as those before him, as well as
those after him, have no intentions of making peace with the
Palestinians. He is simply waving a carrot before Obama to get what
Israel wants, an attack on Iran. It’s as simple as that.
Obama hesitates in confronting the new Israeli agenda, and if the
Congress continues to treat Israel’s security obsessions as top American
priorities, there is no telling what the Middle East will look like the
next time Netanyahu arrives in Washington to meet the new American
- Ramzy Baroud (www.ramzybaroud.net)
is an author and editor of PalestineChronicle.com. His work has been
published in many newspapers, journals and anthologies around the world.
His latest book is, "The Second Palestinian Intifada: A Chronicle of a
People's Struggle" (Pluto Press, London), and his forthcoming book is,
“My Father Was a Freedom Fighter: Gaza’s Untold Story” (Pluto Press,
This site contains copyrighted material the
use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this
constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for
in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
Section 107, the material on this site is
distributed without profit to those
who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information
for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of
your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the