Al-Jazeerah History
Archives
Mission & Name
Conflict Terminology
Editorials
Gaza Holocaust
Gulf War
Isdood
Islam
News
News Photos
Opinion
Editorials
US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)
www.aljazeerah.info
|
|
Obama's speech in Cairo:
Afterthoughts
By Paul J. Balles
ccun.org, Redress, June 14, 2009
Paul J. Balles views some the the deliberate omissions from US
President Barack Omaba’s speech in Cairo on 4 June, which he argues are as
significant as what he said in the speech.
Barack Obama's speech in
Cairo was as notable for what he left out or minimized as it was for what
he included.
Obama used "torture” only twice in his speech in
Cairo. In the first, he said: "I have unequivocally prohibited the use of
torture by the United States." The second was his reference to “Buchenwald
where Jews were enslaved, tortured, shot and gassed to death".
Was
that a carefully crafted message to Israel whose torture methods have been
implicated in Iraq and in Israel's "secret prison" dubbed "Israel's
Guantanamo Bay"? According to Israeli investigative journalist Yossi
Melman, Israel has "quietly become one of the world's most important
exporters of interrogation and counterterrorism methods decried by human
rights groups as constituting torture and violating basic human rights".
The dual reference to torture in Obama's speech ironically implies
that the Israelis have been using and teaching torture techniques they
learned from their German KZ-Wächters (concentration camp guards).
Obama said: "The first issue that we have to confront is violent extremism
in all of its forms." He made it clear that his reference was to Al-Qaeda
and not to Muslims.
He did not mention "terror", "terrorist" or
"terrorism" once during the entire speech. He mentioned Gaza as one of the
places where there are "intolerable" Palestinian refugee camps. He also
referred to the "continuing humanitarian crisis in Gaza".
Fresh
from his complete disregard of Israel's barbarian attacks on Gaza, an
onslaught that killed around 400 children, Obama’s omission certainly must
have pleased those responsible for the massacres in Gaza.
Al-Quds
Al-Arabi, an independent pan-Arab newspaper owned by Palestinian
expatriates in London, observed that "Obama didn't offer any new
initiative for ending the conflict between Israel and Palestine, an
omission that frustrated many".
Among the items omitted from
Obama's speech was the Palestinian right of return to the lands encroached
upon through the Israeli occupation. Palestinian leaders in negotiations
cannot give this right of return away.
Gilad Atzmon tells of how a
Palestinian refugee pointed to him in Houston saying: "My land near Safad
is my land, and no one can negotiate its fate on my behalf. Neither a
Palestinian leader nor any other world leader.”
Some in the
American media – especially on Fox news – castigated Obama for apologizing
for American misdeeds. Had he really done that, he would have expressed
deep regret that US biases were disgustingly responsible for the
convictions of five men for providing charity to suffering Gazans through
the Holy Land Foundation.
He did not mention Hezbollah even once.
His only remark about Lebanon was related to his belief that the "richness
of religious diversity must be upheld – whether it is for Maronites in
Lebanon or the Copts in Egypt". The annihilations of civilians from all
religions represented in Lebanon occurred when Israel decimated the entire
infrastructure of that country in 2006.
Obama's only reference to
Sunnis and Shi’is involved his reflection on how "the divisions between
Sunni and Shi’i have led to tragic violence, particularly in Iraq".
An Israeli critic complained that Obama "did not utter even one word
that might be construed as a threat or even the shadow of a threat against
(Iran's nuclear programme). This, of course, ignored the fact that Obama
went out of his way to expound on his commitment to Israel's well-being.
Other comments by purists and fanatics about things left out of
Obama's Cairo speech are irrelevant to the issues that he wanted to
address. There can be little doubt that Obama’s omissions were purposeful.
What he did include needed to be brought clearly into the open.
Paul J. Balles is a retired American university
professor and freelance writer who has lived in the Middle East for many
years. For more information, see
http://www.pballes.com.
http://www.redress.cc/americas/pjballes20090608
|
|
|