Mission & Name
US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)
Netanyahu Seeking Salvation from US Christian
By M J Rosenberg
ccun.org, August 5, 2009
Benjamin Netanyahu has a problem. The Obama administration is
insisting on a settlements freeze and the Israeli prime minister, who is
resisting such demands, is not getting the support he might have expected
from the American pro-Israel community. Usually, when an American president
makes any sort of demand on Jerusalem, pro-Israel (primarily Jewish)
organizations compel Congress to pressure the president to cease and desist.
It usually works, but not this time.
So what’s an Israeli leader to
do? Netanyahu is turning to a tried and true strategy: Call on Christian
fundamentalists—who see maintaining Israel’s occupation as paramount—to
galvanize popular pressure against President Barack Obama. But just like the
last time he played this card, the tactic is unlikely to work magic for Bibi
For one thing, it’s clear that Netanyahu is on shaky
ground with the mainstream pro-Israel lobby on settlements. At the
president’s meeting with Jewish leaders at the White House on July 13, Obama
heard virtually no criticism of his policy on the settlement issue.
Even the more conservative Jewish groups held their tongues. The only
exception came when one participant urged the president not to change his
policy but rather keep his differences with Israel private, so that there
would be “no daylight” visible between Israeli and American positions. Obama
responded that past administrations did not have much success with that
approach. “For eight years, there was no light between the United States and
Israel, and nothing got accomplished,” he said.
There are numerous
reasons why the Jewish community is not rushing to Netanyahu’s defense.
First, there has never been much support in the United States for West Bank
settlements. AIPAC, the pro-Israel lobby, has never had any use for the
settlements nor have most of the other mainstream pro-Israel organizations.
The pro-Israel, pro-peace organizations like Israel Policy Forum, J Street,
Americans for Peace Now, and Brit Tzedek oppose settlements and fully
support the president’s position.
In addition, Netanyahu has never
been a popular figure in the American Jewish community. His previous tenure
as prime minister was a failure; he was turned out of office in near-record
time (Ehud Barak holds the record).
Yet even in his brief stint in
the top job, he managed to antagonize the United States. Remember, he came
to office less than a year after the assassination of Prime Minister Yitzhak
Rabin, and moved quickly to undo the peace process. Not surprisingly, these
efforts led to a swift deterioration in relations between Netanyahu and
President Bill Clinton, who had cherished his relationship with Rabin and
was proud of the role he played in the Oslo peace process.
the frost, and knowing that getting in Clinton’s good graces would require
endorsing Oslo, Netanyahu turned to the Republicans and to the Christian
Zionists for support. There was nothing subtle about Netanyahu’s embrace of
the right. In fact, during the Monica Lewinsky crisis—when he clearly
believed Clinton was done for—the media carried reports about Netanyahu
joking with House Speaker Newt Gingrich over some of the more salacious
details of the affair.
At about the same time that Netanyahu started
cozying up to right-wing Republicans, the Israeli government intensified its
efforts to court Christian Zionists, fundamentalist Christians whose
theology dictates unwavering support for Israeli control of all the land
from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea.
pro-Israel Jews, Christian Zionists
emphatically support Israeli settlements and oppose the two-state solution.
By no means human rights activists, they do not raise questions about
Israel’s treatment of Palestinians. They are, quite
simply, Netanyahu’s natural constituency—far more natural than the
Jewish community, which tends to be too dovish and human rights oriented for
So, sure enough, Netanyahu was the man of the hour at
last week’s Christians United for Israel (CUFI) conference in Washington.
The organization’s founder, Pastor John Hagee, addressed Netanyahu—who was
in Israel—by satellite, telling him that 50 million Christians support
“Israel’s sovereign right to grow and develop the settlements of Israel as
you see fit and not yield to the pressure of the United States government.”
Netanyahu expressed his gratitude. “Today millions of Christians
stand with Israel because they stand for freedom, millions of Christians
stand with Israel because they stand for truth, millions of Christians stand
for Israel because they want to see genuine peace in the Holy Land,” he
said. The triumvirate of Netanyahu, Hagee, and Israeli Tourism Minister Stas
Misezhnikov now plan to cement their alliance by conference call every three
It has all the makings of a zero sum game. Netanyahu and
other right-wing Israelis hope that the support they gain from the Christian
right can help make up for all the support they have lost among American
liberals over the past several years.
It won’t. Christian Zionists
of the CUFI variety are hardcore Republicans. Their votes are never up for
grabs in elections because they are owned by the GOP—and not because of
Israel. Right-wing Christians, including Christian Zionists, support
Republicans for the party’s stance on abortion, gays, guns, prayer, taxes,
and a host of other conservative issues. Neither the Democrats (who will
never get their votes or their campaign contributions) nor the Republicans
(who will always get both) have any need to court them. So, loud and
organized as they are, this subset of the American right is not a major
On the Israel issue, the only domestic
constituency that matters is the Jewish community and, thus far, it is
supporting Obama—not Netanyahu—on the settlements issue and the peace
process. That should be no surprise, given that most Jews are Democrats and
78 percent of them voted for Obama over McCain.
Unlike the Christian
Zionists, Jews do not support policies that would lead to the end of Israel
and then the apocalypse. Jews want Israel to exist and thrive as a safe
haven not as a cemetery. They rightfully are suspicious of policies
predicated on end-of-days theology, understanding that it views Middle East
peace as undesirable. Most Jews prefer a peaceful secure Israel, as does
Obama, which is one reason why he is pushing so hard on settlements.
He needs to keep it up. The pressure he is putting on Israel will, if
heeded, enhance Israel’s security. As for the other side, it consists of the
same people who, for forty-two years, have blindly
supported Israeli policies that have led to thousands of unnecessary
Like their allies on the Christian right, they are
guided by ideology not reality. In fact, just like their right-wing friends,
they are now bemoaning the fact that Obama justifies his support for a
Jewish state on the Holocaust and not on the Bible and Jewish possession of
the land thousands of years ago.
Fortunately, the old guard
represents a diminishing segment of the pro-Israel community while the vast
majority supports Obama and his demand that settlements stop.
long as that support holds, Obama has a free hand on Arab-Israeli affairs.
And it will hold as long as the president’s popularity remains high. If
Obama’s support declines—whether due to a failure on health care or anything
else—some of his Jewish support will also erode. And that would give
Netanyahu the opening he wants to enlist the Jewish community in his effort
to stop Obama’s efforts to achieve an Israeli-Palestinian deal.
any case, it will be the Jews who make the
difference, not Netanyahu’s irrelevant fundamentalist Christian allies. You
can take CUFI’s John Hagee, throw in Pat Robertson, Newt Gingrich, and the
discredited neocons led by Cheney, Feith, and Limbaugh, and you’ve still got
nothing. What a difference an election makes.
original version of this piece appeared in Foreign Policy and in Newsweek
MJ Rosenberg is the Director of Israel Policy Forum's Washington Policy