Al-Jazeerah: Cross-Cultural Understanding
www.ccun.org www.aljazeerah.info |
Opinion Editorials, August 2009 |
||||||||||||||||||
Archives Mission & Name Conflict Terminology Editorials Gaza Holocaust Gulf War Isdood Islam News News Photos Opinion Editorials US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles) www.aljazeerah.info
|
Emperor's Islamophobia: Shah Rukh Khan at US airport By Ram Puniyani Two Circles, August 26, 2009
Shah Rukh Khan, one of the best known actors from Bollywood was detained for
questioning in Newark airport in US (15th August). The actor who is a global
icon of sorts was grilled by the US official as his name is a Muslim one,
and the legendary actor felt humiliated with the treatment meted out to him.
While the star actor was being questioned in this manner the Jet Airways
staff vouched for him and many of his international fans were seeking his
autographs, but the US official, drunk on the Imperial arrogance and
infected by anti Muslim sentiments refused to recognize Khan. That any
Google search on his name would have yielded infinite entries to establish
his identity, is an elementary knowledge by now.
Just a few weeks ago, India’s ex-President, the scientist of repute, APJ
Abdul Kalam was treated like a commoner by the US based Airlines staff.
Irrfan Khan was also meted with similar treatment. Other actors, with non
Muslim names, have also been given such humiliating treatment by US
officials but the logic in these cases is different, Neil Nitin Mukesh for
having a skin color fairer then his Hindu name and John Abram for having
Afghanistan on his passport. In addition the senior ministers from India
George Fernandez and Pranab Mukherjee have also been strip searched in the
past.
Most of the channels and many eminent columnists criticized Shahrukh Khan
and those voicing their protest on the grounds that it is these security
checks which have saved US from another terrorist attack post 9/11 2001. The
desirability or other wise of these checks apart, there are two basic
questions. One is that can those having diplomatic passports and those
listed in India’s list of people exempt from such checks be subjected to
these ordeals? Secondly why secondary checks are more for those with Muslim
names? These commentators realization of the tasks of US security officials
notwithstanding the questions remain the double standards of the security
check system.
While the major phenomenon visible here is that of US officials have imbibed
the anti Islam and anti Muslim propaganda, post 9/11 2001, the additional
factor is the inherent arrogance and superiority complex of this Imperial
power since US emerged as the sole super power, after the decline of Soviet
block in international political arena. The treatment which US officials are
giving to Indian dignitaries and celebrities is in stark contrast to the
treatment which Indian administration and people are giving to the US
dignitaries. The visit of Hillary Clinton just a month ago demonstrates the
reality. The US Secretary of State was not only given a red carpet welcome,
Indian media also went gaga about her, starting from describing her smart
dresses to the details of her smile at different occasions.
The twin phenomenon of US arrogance as a superpower dictating terms to the
whole World and its targeting of Islam and Muslims for political goals have
got mixed up here. The global democracy which was trying to come up during
the middle of twentieth century has really got a set back during last three
decades, and despite the humane instincts of Barack Hussein Obama, American
system remains as high handed as before. One appreciates the steps of new
American President in closing down Guantonamo bay and the subsequent
stoppage of the intense torture and insult of accused of 9/11, especially
Muslim youth. Despite that it seems the ground level reality of US has not
changed much and Islamophobia is still ruling the policies, mindset and
attitude of the US system as a whole.
It is after 9/11 2001, the collapse of WTC, and the accompanying statements
of Osama bin Laden, which gave the pretext of launching a propaganda against
Islam and Muslims. It was at that time that the word Islamic Terrorism was
coined and the distorted version of core words, Jihad and Kafir were
strongly popularized in the popular thinking. In a way it manufactured a
hatred for Muslims and Islam. While Jihad stands for fighting against
injustice, it was presented as killing of non Muslims. While Kafir is a
concept totally invalid in current times, it was put across as denigrating
non Muslims. The net result was that in the global thinking it came to be
regarded that all Muslims are not terrorists, while all terrorists are
Muslims. The US officials in general and immigration officials in particular
stiffened their attitude towards Muslim immigrants to US. Globally also,
particularly in our country the trend began where after every blast here and
there scores of Muslim youth were apprehended and tortured, and at most of
the times their careers were ruined.
The Pakistani film ‘Khuda Ke Liye’ depicted the life of an average Muslims
whom US officials suspect to be a terrorist and the outcome of this can be
well predicted. Indian film ‘New York’ also puts forward the cruelty of the
attitude of US officials. In Indian context films like ‘Black and White’ and
‘Mumbai Meri Jaan’ depicted this sad reality of our society. Many a good
articles and literature has also been produced by scholars, which gives us
the real story, but despite all this the propaganda by section of US media
and the vested organizations in India against Islam and Muslims continues.
The phenomenon of terrorism is very complex. One core point is to understand
the genesis of Al Qaeda type organizations, which were the product of
indoctrination in the Madrassas, set up in Pakistan. The syllabus and
financial support of these came through CIA; the aim was to instigate
indoctrinated Muslim youth to fight against the Russian armies who had
occupied Afghanistan. Lately this truth is being said by Pakistani leader’s
time and over again. In India the rising communal violence and acts of
terrorism because of diverse factors, have been used to present the
minorities in a negative light.
We in India can feel hurt, insulted and angry to what is being meted out to
Indian celebrities and leaders. It is in a way the attitude of US to
humiliate ‘others’, to assert its superiority and hegemony. The commentators
criticizing the protest against treatment being meted out to the likes of
Shah Rukh Khan and Indian dignitaries have to realize that it is not just to
uphold the differential status but to protest against the highhanded
attitude of United States. The time has come to revive the global democratic
equations where the hegemony of one country is not acceptable and people of
all countries and religions are treated with equal respect.
http://www.twocircles.net/2009aug23/emperor_s_islamophobia_shah_rukh_khan_us_airport.html
|
|
Opinions expressed in various sections are the sole responsibility of their authors and they may not represent ccun.org. editor@ccun.org |