Al-Jazeerah History
Archives
Mission & Name
Conflict Terminology
Editorials
Gaza Holocaust
Gulf War
Isdood
Islam
News
News Photos
Opinion
Editorials
US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)
www.aljazeerah.info
|
|
Israel Investigated, But Will It Repent?
By Ramzy Baroud
ccun.org, April 14, 2009
Any variation of the words “Palestine” and “massacre” are sure
to yield millions of results on major search engines on the World Wide
Web. These results are largely in reference to hundreds of different dates
and events in which numerous Palestinians were killed by the Israeli army
or settlers. But references to massacres of similar nature precede the
state of Israel itself, whose establishment was secured through the
ever-expanding agenda of ethnically cleansing Palestinians. Throughout its
history, this bloodletting project has been carried out for once specific
purpose, that being the illegal acquirement of land and the suppression or
extermination of those who dare to resist. Israel has denied
almost every massacre it has committed. Those too obvious to deny, were
“investigated” by Israel itself, which predictably, mostly found its
soldiers “not guilty” or culpable of minor misconduct. Israeli
“investigations” served the dual purpose of helping Israelis retain their
sense of moral superiority, and sending a highly touted message to
international media of Israeli democracy at work and the independence of
the country’s judiciary. With the Gaza tragedy of December
2008-January 2009 being the latest in the ever growing list of Palestinian
massacres, little seems to have changed the way Israel views its action,
with the full approval of the US and the half hearted position of much of
the international community. Nonetheless, on April 3, the United
Nations Human Rights Council appointed Richard Goldstone, a South-African
Jewish judge to further investigate what the council had already resolved,
in a vote on January 12, as “grave” violations of human rights by the
Israeli army, in reference to the 22-day Israeli onslaught in Gaza, where
over 1,400 Palestinians – mostly civilians – were killed and over 5,500
wounded. Israeli foreign ministry spokesman Yigal Palmor told
AFP, in response to the UNHRC decision that the investigation was “not an
attempt to find the truth but to tarnish Israel's reputation and to join
efforts led by some countries to demonize Israel.” He added, “The
investigation has no moral ground since it decided even before it started
who is guilty and of what.” Palmor went on to exploit Israel’s ever
winning card: democracy, claiming that democratic nations didn’t support
the call to investigate the Gaza murders. But the truth is, the
UNHRC didn’t jump to conclusions, but was following up on massive
evidence, all pointing to the same inference: that Israel has committed
war crimes in Gaza. The work of UN human rights investigator
Richard Falk itself represents an inescapable indictment of the Israeli
army. His statements and reports of recent months maintained that the
Israeli blockade against Gaza is “an unconditional violation of
international humanitarian law”, and that “massive assault on a densely
populated urbanized setting, subjected the entire civilian population to
“an inhumane form of warfare that kills, maims and inflicts mental harm”.
The illegality of the Israeli war and the violations of human
rights committed throughout the Israeli violence are not only made clear
by the international legal standards used by Falk; many others made
similar assessments. For example, on March 23, UN human rights
experts accused Israel, of using Gazans as human shields, highlighting the
case of an 11-year-old boy. UN secretary-general's envoy for protecting
children in armed conflict, Radhika Coomaraswamy stated that Israeli
“violations were reported on a daily basis, too numerous to list.”
Coomaraswamy “explained that the Israeli army shot Palestinian children,
bulldozed a home with a woman and child still inside and shelled a
building they had ordered civilians into a day earlier,” Press TV
reported. But these were “just a few examples of the hundreds of incidents
that have been documented and verified”. The Israeli onslaught and
ongoing siege has cost Gaza dearly, destroyed its humble economy, ruined
its arable land and continues to starve its population. Reports of such
facts are easily available. The words “Gaza” and “destroyed” are also sure
to yield ample results. Falk, a well-regarded Jewish professor knew fully
the underpinnings of his statement when he said in late January that the
Israeli actions in Gaza are reminiscent of “the worst kind of
international memories of the Warsaw Ghetto”. Still, Palmor, like
most Israelis, is not convinced, and continues to sermonize on morality
and democracy and the rest of the ever predictable terms. But if Palmor
indeed believes of such an international conspiracy of ‘undemocratic’
countries to “tarnish” Israel’s otherwise prefect “reputation”, he might
wish to revert to Israeli newspaper Haaretz’s extensive coverage of
Israeli soldiers’ testimonies of their own conduct in Gaza. “It
feels like hunting season has begun,” Haaretz quoted an Israeli soldier
who served in Gaza as saying. “Sometimes it reminds me of a Play Station
(computer) game. You hear cheers in the war room after you see on the
screens that the missile hit a target, as if it were a soccer game.”
“There was one house with a family in it... we put them into some room.
Afterward, we left the house and another company went in, and a few days
after we went in there was an order to release the family. We took our
positions upstairs. There was a sniper positioned on the roof and the
company commander released the family and told them to take a right,” said
another soldier. “One mother and her two children didn't understand, and
they took a left. Someone forgot to notify the sniper on the roof that the
family had been released, and that it was okay, it was fine, to hold fire,
and he... you can say he acted as necessary, as he was ordered to.”
In a better world, many Israeli political and military leaders would find
themselves before an international criminal court answering difficult
questions. For now, they remain adamant that the Israeli army is the “most
moral” in the world. One must hope that the term “justice for
Palestine” will quit being simply a popular search item, and in fact
reflect a tangible reality; so that the extensive list of Palestinian
massacres will finally come to an end. - Ramzy Baroud (www.ramzybaroud.net)
is an author and editor of PalestineChronicle.com. His work has been
published in many newspapers, journals and anthologies around the world.
His latest book is, "The Second Palestinian Intifada: A Chronicle of a
People's Struggle" (Pluto Press, London), and his forthcoming book is, “My
Father Was a Freedom Fighter: Gaza The Untold Story” (Pluto Press, London)
|
|
|