Fear-mongering in 2008 US presidential
election
By Abdus Sattar Ghazali
ccun.org, September 29, 2008
The Wall Street tumbles as stocks plunge in a worst drop since 9/11.
Premier investment banks fail, with Leman Brothers filing bankruptcy and
Merrill Lynch seeks refuge in the fold of Bank of America to avoid
collapse.
Home foreclosures mount, with one in every 416 U.S. households entering
the foreclosure process.
And gas price soars, food prices rise, unemployment graph climbs and
real and nominal wages shrink.
But for the Republican election machine such trouble spots in the
economy are no cause of concern. And with little to fall on nearly eight
years of President Bush's misrule that landed the nation in the worst
economic crisis since the Great Depression, the desperate Republican
Party has ratcheted up its campaign with half-truths and fear mongering
which has been the hallmark of the Bush Administration.
As the 2008 presidential election campaign enters final seven weeks, the
Republican Party - in a replay of the 2004 and 2006 elections - is
playing its typical tactic, Scare America.
The most blatant use of fear mongering came on the final day of the
Republican National Convention when John McCain delivered his GOP
nomination acceptance speech and Rudy Giuliani and Mitt Romney hyped the
threat of the so-called "Islamic terrorism."
Now, in a pathetic attempt to scare people into voting for John McCain,
28 million copies of a right-wing, terror propaganda DVD produced in
Israel - "Obsession: Radical Islam's War Against the West" - are being
mailed and bundled in newspaper deliveries to voters in swing states.
The New York Times last Sunday inserted 145,000 DVDs in its papers
delivered in the following markets: Denver, Miami/Palm Beach, Tampa,
Orlando, Detroit, Kansas City, St Louis, Cincinnati, Philadelphia,
Pittsburgh, Milwaukee/Madison. These are all in swing states. Next, it
was being distributed in many newspapers in the electoral battleground
states of Ohio, Michigan, Florida, Pennsylvania and Colorado, in
addition to North Carolina.
The Clarion Fund, founded by Israeli-Canadian Rabbi Raphael Shore, paid
millions of dollars to get the DVD out. Not surprisingly, the shadowy
Clarion Fund has refused to disclose its board of directors or donors.
Raphael Shore is listed as producer and Wayne Kopping as director of the
propaganda film. According to Haaretz newspaper, "Shore and director
Wayne Kopping of South Africa are the only figures associated with the
film willing to release their real names. The executive producer is
listed as Peter Mier, while the production manager is listed as Brett
Halperin. But Mier and Halperin are just aliases, Shore says. He
describes the real Mier as a Canadian Jewish businessman who wanted to
do something significant, but asked to remain anonymous for fear of his
safety. According to Shore, about 80 percent of the film's $400,000
budget was provided by Mier."
Who is Raphael Shore, the founder of the New York-based Clarion Fund?
His biographic sketch on Wikipedia says little. In part it says:
"Raphael Shore is an Israeli-Canadian film writer and producer.He is the
founder of The Clarion Fund, a non-profit organization that seeks to
advance the idea that the United States faces a threat of radical Islam.
Shore is also a regular critic of the media coverage on the
Israeli-Palestinian conflict, coverage which he alleges is regularly
anti-Israel."
Wikipedia bio doesn't say that Raphael Shore is a Rabbi and the program
director of Jerusalem-based Aish HaTorah ("Fire of the Torah"), which is
making common cause with Jewish anti-Muslim activists.
Tellingly, Clarion Fund director of communications, Gregory Ross, told
Page magazine, a right-wing online publication: "We are just a few weeks
from completely our next documentary, The Jihad. This new film will take
a look at radical Islam's activities here in the U.S. We should be
releasing the film in early October."
The noxious propaganda movie, also distributed at the Democratic and
Republican parties nomination conventions by Watch Obsession
Organization, has been relegated to the university film circuit where
right-wing and pro-Israel campus groups have organized screenings.
Jewish and Republican students groups have sponsored scores of
screenings of the propaganda film amid protests and rising student
tensions on many campuses. A screening at the Pace University in New
York was canceled last year and rescheduled only months later after
administrators pressured the Jewish Student organization, Hillel's
leaders into calling off their event. Not surprisingly Georgia Tech
screening sponsored by the College Republicans required extra security
as part of the so-called Islamophobic week dubbed as "Islamofascism
Awareness Day" in 2007. Tellingly, a screening at New York University,
distributors of the film required viewers to register at
IsraelActivism.com, the Web site of Aish HaTorah's Hasbara Fellowships.
"The threat of Radical Islam is the most important issue facing us
today. But it's a topic that neither the presidential candidates nor the
media are discussing openly. It's our responsibility to ensure we can
all make an informed vote in November," reads the sleeve of the DVD.
The movie attempts to equate Islam with Nazism, with showcases scenes of
Muslim children being encouraged to become suicide bombers, interspersed
with shots of Nazi rallies with narration by commentators such as
Islamophobist Daniel Pipes.
Other anti-Muslim and anti-Islam luminaries featuring the film are: Alan
M. Dershowitz,
Steven Emerson, Brigitte Gabriel, Martin Gilbert, Caroline Glick, Alfons
Heck, Glen Jenvey,
John Loftus, Itamar Marcus, Walid Shoebat andProf. Robert Wistrich
In short, the propaganda movie contains within it numerous verified
false claims and obvious errors. Some easy examples are the incorrect
translations of Arabic documents to English, mislabeling Arabic
television with Iranian or Persian television, events and scenarios
placed out of context, as well as testimony given by self proclaimed
reformed terrorists. It is a typical cherry picking of inflammatory
images and splicing them together to create fear.
Scaring the scareable before an election! The distribution of the movie,
less than two months before Election Day, is a ploy to assist GOP
presidential candidate John McCain. It will surely incite more hate and
bigotry against the Muslim community. When smear techniques are used
against any other religious or minority group, it is recognized as
bigotry but when it's aimed at Islam or Muslims it is not.
Its aim is to liken radical Islam to Nazism and to promote the state of
Israel, said Omid Safi, a professor of Islamic Studies at UNC-Chapel
Hill, who has seen the film several times. "One of the running themes
is, 'We stand today as the world stood in 1938,' " said Safi, referring
to the rise of Nazism. "It's fear mongering. It appeals to people's
emotions."
To borrow Arianna Huffington, fear is a frighteningly effective sales
pitch -- one that has worked like a charm for Republicans since the days
of the Cold War Red Scares, and especially since 9/11.
Abdus Sattar Ghazali is the Executive Director of the
online magazine, American Muslim Perspective:
www.amperspective.com
E-mail: asghazali@gmail.com
Fair Use
Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the
use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this
constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for
in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
Section 107, the material on this site is
distributed without profit to those
who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information
for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of
your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
copyright owner.