Al-Jazeerah: Cross-Cultural Understanding
www.ccun.org www.aljazeerah.info |
Opinion Editorials, September 2008 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Archives Mission & Name Conflict Terminology Editorials Gaza Holocaust Gulf War Isdood Islam News News Photos Opinion Editorials US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles) www.aljazeerah.info
|
Open Letter to President Mahmoud Abbas Concerning the Inalienable Palestinian Right of Return ccun.org, September 26, 2008
Note:
The following letter was presented to President Mahmoud Abbas's
office on behalf of 78 Palestinian organizations on Wednesday September
23, 2008. Note that ALL Palestinian political factions have signed on as
well. CC: Dear Mr. President, Greetings of Return
We, the undersigned
Palestinian refugee organizations, civil society movements and
institutions in the Palestinian homeland and in exile are national
organizations working to defend the right of return. We appeal to you
now because we are convinced that the alignment of the official
Palestinian position and the position of the Palestinian people with
regards to the final status negotiation issues is of the highest
priority. Foremost among these issues is the cause of the Palestinian
refugees. We are convinced that
the alignment of popular and official positions is the main guarantee of
a strong Palestinian position in the current negotiation process, which
is taking place in a local, regional and global context that jeopardizes
the national rights of the Palestinian people. In this context, we are
concerned in particular about the rights of Palestinian refugees and
internally displaced persons to return to their original lands and
properties, restitution of their homes, lands and properties and
compensation for damages incurred over the past 60 years. Based on the
fact that all of these rights are guaranteed under international law,
and based on our awareness of the enormous pressures faced by
Palestinian negotiators and the tactics of negotiations, such as secrecy
with regards to the negotiation proceedings, we call upon you to adopt a
negotiation strategy that is based on openness with the entirety of the
Palestinian people - irrespective of their current place of residence -
regarding all aspects and details of the negotiation process.
Implementation of the Palestinian refugees' right of return was and
continues to be the main purpose for which the Palestine Liberation
Organization (PLO) was established, a purpose which forms the central
pillar of the PLO's legitimacy as the sole legitimate representative of
the Palestinian people. Transparency and candidness of our
representatives with all sectors of our society will guarantee that our
rights are best defended, and strengthen our position in the face of
enormous pressures.
It has been clear at all
stages of the negotiations that this process aims to eliminate the core
issue of the Arab/Palestinian struggle for freedom and justice: the
Palestinian refugees and their rights of return and restitution. In
fact, elimination of these central Palestinian/Arab demands form the
center-piece of both Israeli and US policies. It is also no secret that
during the so-called "Oslo Peace Process" these policies have employed
insidious tactics in order to nullify these rights altogether. Such
tactics include attempts to substitute the return and restitution of the
refugees with monetary compensation; to reduce the number of those
entitled to exercise these rights from over 7 million Palestinian
refugees and internally displaced persons to a tiny minority, including
so-called "hardship cases" that would be arbitrarily defined by Israel;
to suggest that the refugees return to homes located in the areas
administered by the Palestinian Authority; and other humiliating "trade
offs" whereby Palestinians are expected to surrender the right of
refugees to return to homes, lands and properties of origin in exchange
for other rights and demands, such as self-determination, borders, the
reclamation of Jerusalem and removal of the illegal settlement-colonies.
The Palestinian leadership has rejected such degrading bargaining
tactics in previous negotiations, notably those known as the second Camp
David summit and the Clinton initiative. The late President Yasser
Arafat rejected these tactics, and he was made to pay for that with his
liberty and his life.
Whereas
the rights of return, restitution and compensation are enshrined in
international law and specifically affirmed in UN General Assembly
Resolution 194 and UN Security Council Resolution 237; Whereas
we see that increasing US pressure aims to force Palestinian negotiators
to agree to an obscure framework for a solution that is to be achieved
by any means and at the soonest date, and that such a framework is
largely for internal US consumption in the context of a US Presidential
election; Whereas
it has become clear that the US administration is working on other
fronts to market its obscure framework for a solution in the September
2008 session of the UN General Assembly; Whereas
we realize, as a result of our movement's long and difficult experience
with Israeli politics, that Israeli political actors seek to solve the
internal Israeli political crisis by venting destruction on the
Palestinian front through various policies and practices, all of which
work to entrench Israeli occupation, colonialism, and apartheid, and aim
to attain international recognition of Israel as a 'Jewish State;' Whereas
Western and Israeli election platforms must not be employed to put
pressure on the Palestinian negotiators, who should in no way be a party
to the political maneuvers of US and Israeli political candidates,
particularly in order to protect the legality, legitimacy, and sanctity
of Palestinian national rights regardless of who emerges victorious in
foreign elections; Whereas
we perceive the retreat of the once principled European position, and
the transformation of this position into one that conforms to the US
policy of total complicity and support for Israel; Whereas
we witness the sharp, painful and unprecedented deterioration in the
internal Palestinian political arena; Whereas
it has become plain and obvious that powerful external pressures aim to
annul Palestinian refugee rights, particularly the right to return to
their original lands and properties and the restitution of these lands
and properties; Whereas
the primary measure of the
legitimacy of any solution remains the extent to which it will lead to
the exercise of the right of self-determination by the Palestinian
people, including foremost the right of Palestinian refugees to choose
to return to their original homes and lands regardless of their current
place of refuge,
We approach you
with this statement based on our strong desire to chart a way forward
that is built on the highest levels of clarity and candidness with the
Palestinian people; a way forward that aims to strengthen the
Palestinian position in this sensitive stage of the Palestinian
struggle; a way forward that ensures that any framework for a solution
will include the following principles in clear and immutable language:
The right of return is
an individual right held by every Palestinian refugee and internally
displaced person. This right is passed on from one generation to the
next, based on the individual's choice on whether or not to return, an
inalienable and indivisible right, and not affected by any bilateral,
multilateral, or international treaty or agreement. Any such agreement
must respect the fundamental precepts and principles of international
law;
The right of Palestinian
refugees and internally displaced persons to return is a collective
right that is not limited to one group or another, and it is an integral
part of the Palestinian right of self-determination;
The right of Palestinian
refugees and internally displaced persons to return is not subject to
referendum.
May you remain steadfast
in our struggle for freedom and dignity Drafted: August 2008 Signed: 194 Association (Syria)
Fair Use Notice This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
|
|
Opinions expressed in various sections are the sole responsibility of their authors and they may not represent ccun.org. editor@ccun.org |