Maverick McCain: Actions without Thought
By Muqtedar Khan
ccun.org, October 10, 2008
At present, the talk of judgment, especially of the political kind, is
very loud in the American public sphere. Astonishingly, it is
startlingly absent in the political decisions made by those very same
people who seem to value judgment as a desirable personal trait.
The reelection of George W. Bush in 2004 clearly indicated that
political sensibility had suffered a heart attack in America. His
abysmal management of the two wars he launched and the current state of
economy testify to the lack of prudence in the American people's
decision to reelect him. In the past few days an avalanche of political
decisions, made especially by Republicans, suggests that good judgment
is now on life support.
What is political judgment anyway? I think it is an innate capacity to
make good political choices. It is the ability to make decisions which
are informed not just by existing political circumstances but also by a
grasp of what is the public good. It is also a reflection of an ability
to understand the nuances involved and display the tact and diplomacy
necessary to ensure that good decisions are acted upon. Political
judgment is the exercise of prudence and wisdom in politics at the
expense of partisanship and selfishness. It is the privileging of
long-term interests and the good of the largest number.
In short all the qualities that define political judgment are in essence
antithetical to what we mean by the term "maverick.'.
Dictionaries define maverick as "An unbranded range animal, especially a
calf that has become separated from its mother," sort of like Sarah
Palin who sounds like one who has been separated from her mother ship,
or "a dissenter". So a maverick is one who is either lost or one
who breaks away from a group and is eventually lost. Neither is an
indicator of good judgment or prudence.
John McCain insists that he is a maverick, and he and Palin are a team
of mavericks.
Unless they are asserting that the entire Republican Party has lost its
marbles, has somehow gone brain dead, there is no virtue in claiming
that being a maverick is a good thing. I think they are doing just that.
Every time the McCain-Palin ticket insists that they should be elected
because they are a pair of mavericks, they are saying that the
Republican Party en masse has lost its capacity to make good political
judgments and since they are not like the rest of the Republicans, they
are a good bet.
McCain has demonstrated in my opinion, that maverick or no maverick, he
lacks political judgment. Here are a few examples. In 2000, he called
Christian conservative leaders as "agents of intolerance" and "evil
influence on the Republican Party". Not very prudent given the fact that
social conservatives form the backbone of the Republican Party.
His decision to support the war in Iraq, and his continued support for
the Bush foreign policy suggests that when it comes to national
security, McCain is no different from Bush. He is not a maverick on
national security and therefore as devoid of political judgment as the
Bush administration.
In recent weeks he has shown that far from good judgment, the man may
not even be intellectually stable. His decision to suspend his campaign
to campaign for a 700 billion dollar handout for the Wall Street showed
that even his political gimmicks are silly.
His statement that "the fundamentals of the American Economy are strong"
even as everything around him was coming down, so hard that he had to
suspend his campaign to address the disasters in the "fundamentally
sound" US economy; defines McCain – a man completely out of touch with
reality.
Will it be good judgment to vote for a man who understands so little
about the economy, when the economy is in doldrums?
Finally, his choice to put Sarah Palin a heartbeat away from American
Presidency says it all. Sarah Palin is so awfully challenged in the
attic, that if she does not fall flat on her face, it is for Republicans
a moment for celebration. Peggy Noonan a strong Palin supporter, gushed
in the Wall Street Journal about Palin's performance in the Vice
Presidential debate, "She is not a person of thought but of action."
Exactly; action without thought, that is what we will get if we put
Mcain and Palin in the White House.
Look around you, see what eight years of governance without jdugment
have done to America. Do you have the good judgment to vote for change?
Dr. Muqtedar Khan is Director of Islamic Studies at the
University of Delaware and Fellow of the Institute for Social Policy and
Understanding.
--
Dr. M. A. Muqtedar Khan
Associate Professor
Director of Islamic Studies
University of Delaware
Tel: 302-831-1939
URL: www.ijtihad.org
Fair Use
Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the
use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this
constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for
in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
Section 107, the material on this site is
distributed without profit to those
who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information
for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of
your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
copyright owner.