Obama Mania
By Stephen Lendman
ccun.org, November 12, 2008
On November 4, the world exhaled. The age of George Bush
ended, and a new one under Barak Obama began. With high hopes he'll
reverse the toxic legacy of the past eight years. Adopt socially
progressive policies. End foreign wars. Govern the nation responsibly,
democratically for all its people. Show his supporters that their faith
in him was justified.
"Let us congratulate ourselves on being
alive at such a promising moment," wrote The Nation magazine's William
Greider. His victory is "a monumental rebuke to tragic history -- the
ultimate defeat of 'while supremacy.' Barak Obama has already changed
this nation profoundly. Like King before him, the man is a great and
brave teacher. (He) redefined the country for us."
The Nation
endorsed Obama early on and called his candidacy "historic (for) a new
generation (with) new possibilities....a sea-change of course (for)
progressive-driven reform....(the) end of the Reagan era....an end of
the occupation of Iraq....empowering labor (and) challenging our trade
policies." A socially liberal new beginning.
A "transformational
presidency," according to its editor Katrina Vanden Heuvel. A "new era
of possibility opened up by Barak Obama's victory. (His) team's respect
for the core decency, dignity and intelligence of the American people
was reflected in the campaign's" rhetoric. He represents "a historic
opportunity for a progressive governing agenda and a mandate for bold
action....Tonight we celebrate."
Early on, The Nation
shamelessly endorsed Obama with over-hyped expectations for him. They're
unfounded, and based on early indications, hold the cheers. Obama's
transition team is the first sign of the type people he'll choose for
cabinet and other top posts. Insiders all, including former Clinton
administration figures. The usual cast of characters in Democrat or
Republican administrations. The parts nearly interchangeable for their
common agenda. Progressive? A new beginning? A "mandate for bold
action?" A reason to "celebrate?" Indeed so for insiders, who engineered
what's now apparent.
Earlier this writer imagined it, but who
then could have known. In a July article titled A Possible September
Surprise," it was suggested that "Republicans may stick with a likely
loser, someone many insiders dislike, go for a 1976 repeat, turn things
over to a Democrat, let him deal with their mess, then retake the
presidency next time around."
In the 1970s, the Rockefellers
(America's most powerful family) chose Jimmy Carter for president after
the turbulent Nixon years. Gerald Ford went along as window dressing.
The same process repeated in 2008 to decompress after eight toxic Bush
years. A needed respite for the country, the world, and humanity. A new
party and face to appear different from the old one. Who better chosen
than the first black president (a stroke of genius some believe) to
deflect attention from the past and focus it all on him and the task he
faces.
McCain-Palin was the vehicle. A perfect foil. A
caricature-like ticket. An embarrassment. Supremely unqualified on both
ends. By a man with a distinct "passion gap" for conservatives. Known
mostly for his unpredictable temperament, unimpressive intellect,
instability, and genius for making enemies in his own party. And a woman
more knowledgeable about fishing than affairs of state. Pulled from
obscurity. Noted only for having been chosen. Now consigned to a
footnote in history. One conservatives plan to forget, then erase.
Now a new beginning under Obama. With hoped for change that he promised.
A "bold mandate (for) progressive governing." A "transformational
presidency." The end of neoliberalism and new era for his faithful. With
legions lining up to cheer. Unmindful of how American politics works.
The way it is most everywhere. The same old, same old that The New York
Times ignored in saying that "Obama began moving (swiftly) to build his
administration and make good on his ambitious promises to point the US
in a different direction...."
Without a whiff of progressivism
in any high-level appointees so far named, suggested, or in his
transition team co-chairmen:
John Podesta
From 1998 -
2001, he was Clinton's chief of staff, and in the 1980s, served as legal
counsel for various congressional committees. He's the founder and
current president of the Center for American Progress, a Democrat party
front group claiming progressive credentials that got seed money from
investor and Obama advisor Warren Buffett. He's also a visiting law
professor at Georgetown University Law Center, and since 1988 the head
of the Podesta Group, a Washington-based lobbying firm representing
corporations like Lockheed Martin, BP, and Walmart as well as trade
associations among its other clients. The Washingtonian magazine ranked
him the third most powerful city lobbyist.
Valerie Jarrett
A Chicagoan who worked for Mayor Harold Washington in the 1980s as
Deputy Corporation Counsel for Finance and Development. She then moved
on to the Daley administration in the 1990s as deputy chief of staff and
in other positions. She's currently CEO of the Habitat Company, a real
estate development and management firm with a dubious record. She works
closely with city officials on public housing and helped the Chicago
Housing Authority get public subsidies for its notoriously substandard
work.
Habitat managed Grove Parc Plaza from 2001 - 2008 and an
even larger complex that the federal government seized in 2006 because
of its dilapidated and uninhabitable state. Nonetheless, she's rumored
to become the new housing secretary where she may do for the country
what she did to Chicago.
Jarrett is also a Board member of the
Chicago Stock Exchange where she served as chairman from 2004 - 2007.
She's one of Obama's most trusted and longest serving advisors and
campaign aides.
Pete Rouse
He's a long-time Capitol
Hill insider for over 30 years. Once served as Senate majority leader
Tom Daschle's chief of staff and was known as "the 101st senator"
because of his knowledge, skill and contacts. He's been allied to Obama
since 2004. Wrote his "Strategic Plan" for his first year in the Senate
and also served as his chief of staff.
All three individuals are
expected to have key roles in the new administration once it takes over
in January as well as others on the Transition Project. It's been around
for months as a fund-raising front. The Chicago Sun Times said it was to
raise money from individual donors up to a maximum $5000 and do no
internet or direct mail solicitations. It helped Obama raise $600
million for his campaign, and though he claimed transparency as one of
his principles, he made no "voluntary early disclosures." Money raised
is also being used for his transition period with no mention of how
he'll use any residual amounts.
Other Transition Project Members
Carol Browner
She served as Administrator of the
Environmental Protection Agency for eight years under Bill Clinton. The
longest of anyone in that position. Earlier she worked for Citizen
Action in Washington. As general counsel for the Florida House of
Representatives Government Operations Committee and for Senator Lawton
Chiles. In addition, as Senator Al Gore's Legislative Director. In 2001,
she joined the Albright Group, a global strategy firm headed by former
secretary of state Madeleine Albright.
William Daley
Brother of Chicago mayor Richard M. Daley. He's a lawyer and was
Clinton's secretary of commerce from 1997 - 2000. He's a well-connected
insider and member of numerous high-powered organizations like the
Council on Foreign Relations, Friends of Hillary, Friends of Joe
Lieberman, Obama for America, and a number of corporate boards.
Companies like Boeing, Abbott Labs, Merck and Boston Properties. He's
also vice-chairman of Evercore Partners, a 1996-founded investment
banking "boutique providing advisory services to prominent multinational
corporations on significant mergers, acquisitions, divestitures,
restructuring, and other strategic corporate transactions."
In
the Clinton administration, Daley was instrumental in getting NAFTA
passed. He's also a past president of SBC Communications and was later
Midwest chairman of JP Morgan Bank among other positions, including the
practice of law.
Michael Froman
He's president and CEO
of CitiInsurance, a branch of banking giant Citigroup. Also a senior
fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations and a Resident Fellow at the
German Marshall Fund of the United States. Earlier and in the Clinton
administration, he served as treasury department chief of staff from
1977 to 1999. From 1993 - 1995, he was director for International
Affairs on the National Economic Council and the National Security
Council at the White House.
Federico Pena
He held two
cabinet posts under Bill Clinton - from 1993 - 1997 as transportation
secretary and from 1997 - 1998 as energy secretary. In 1992, he advised
then governor Clinton on transportation issues. Since 1998, he's been
affiliated with the investment firm, Vestar Capital Partners, as senior
advisor and is now one of its managing directors.
Suggested
Obama Administration Members
The first already chosen as Obama's
chief of staff - Rahm Emanuel, but hold the cheers. He's an influential
insider and Democrat member of the House since 2003. In 1991, he joined
the Clinton campaign as a fundraiser. Then later was political director
and senior advisor.
From 1999 - 2002, he was a managing director
for investment bank Dresdner, Kleinwort, Wasserstein in Chicago and also
served as mayor Richard Daley's chief fundraiser.
In 2006, he
chaired the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee for the midterm
elections. He's the fourth ranking House Democrat. A hawk, neoliberal
and pro-Israeli hardliner. Now deceased long-time Chicago activist,
investigative reporter, and founder and chairman of the Citizens
Committee to Clean up the Courts, Sherman Skolnick, called him the
"acting deputy chief for North America of the (Israeli intelligence)
Mossad."
He's the son of Benjamin Emanuel (changed from Auerbach
in 1936 by his grandfather Ezekiel), a Chicago pediatrician involved
pre-1948 with smuggling weapons to the Irgun. The Israeli group former
prime minister Menachem Begin headed that in 1946 bombed the King David
Hotel and conducted numerous other terrorist attacks.
Emanuel
is hard line like his father in his one-sided support for Israel. He's
dismissive of pro-Palestinian sympathies, and supports a failed peace
process that guarantees no chance for one. In 1991, he served as a
civilian volunteer in the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) during the Gulf
war and is believed to hold dual citizenships.
The Nation
magazine's David Corn praised his appointment and called Emanuel "an
intelligent, fierce, competent, and sharp Washington partisan....an
agent of change....and guy who gets things done." Corn also hailed
Obama's victory and called him "one of the most progressive (or liberal)
nominees in the Democratic Party's recent history." Looking ahead to his
presidency, he represents "hope and change. He opposed the Iraq
war....Bush's tax cuts for the rich. He was no advocate of let-'er-rip,
free market capitalism or American unilateralism. In policy terms, Obama
represents a serious course correction....And more."
In fact,
Obama is mostly opposite of what Corn suggests. On financial and
economic matters alone, his Transitional Economic Advisory Board reveals
it. All its 17 members are high-level corporate and financial types plus
Democrat party insiders. CEOs like Warren Buffet, Robert Rubin and head
of four major corporations Penny Pritzker with more about her below
regarding her dubious business dealings and influential role in an Obama
administration. His other Brain Trust members (as the Wall Street
Journal calls them) are:
-- Roel Campos - former SEC
commissioner;
-- Daniel Tarullo - Georgetown University
professor and former deputy director for international affairs of the
National Economic Council (NEC) from 1993 - 1998;
-- Eric
Schmidt - CEO of Google;
-- Antonio Villaraigosa - mayor of Los
Angeles;
-- William Donaldson - former SEC chairman, under
secretary of state, chairman and CEO of the New York Stock Exchange, CEO
of Aetna, and founder and head of the investment firm Donaldson, Lufkin
& Jenrette;
-- Laura Tyson - former chairman of the National
Economic Council (NEC);
-- David Bonier - former congressman;
-- vice president-elect Joe Biden;
-- Jennifer Granholm -
governor of Michigan;
-- Paul Volker - former Fed chairman with
more on him below;
-- Rahm Emanuel - congressman and incoming
White House chief of staff; it's the most important administration post
after the president and a Dick Cheney type vice-presidency;
--
Richard Parsons - chairman of Time Warner;
-- Anne Mulcahy - CEO
of Xerox;
-- Lawrence Summers - former Treasury secretary with
more on him below;
-- Roger Ferguson - CEO of TIAA-CREF
financial services;
--John Podesta - transition team head;
-- Robert Reich - former labor secretary; and
-- William Daley -
former commerce secretary.
Noticeably absent - anyone
representing ordinary people. Workers, homeowners, the unemployed, the
disadvantaged, the poor who've been hurt the most by Wall
Street's-caused financial crisis now morphed into the worst economic
downturn since the Great Depression. Their omission is clear evidence
where Obama's administration is headed, where his allegiance lies, and
what his policy directives will look like. A rigid class society, white
supremacism, and neoliberalism are safe in his hands.
-- he's
for permanent occupation of Iraq;
-- America's imperial agenda;
-- militarism and foreign wars;
-- new ones against
Pakistan; possibly Iran as well;
-- an enlarged military;
-- more troops to Afghanistan;
-- a new Cold War with Russia;
-- in 2006, campaigned for Joe Lieberman against anti-war candidate
Ned Lemont;
-- opposes impeaching Bush and Cheney;
-- in
July 2005, backed reauthorizing the Patriot Act with its police state
provisions;
-- supports Homeland Security funding to enforce
them;
-- supports the death penalty;
-- privatized in
lieu of public education;
-- is one-sidedly pro-Israel;
-- opposes universal single-payer national health care;
--
supports medical providers in wrongful injury cases;
-- backs
"free trade" and initiatives like NAFTA;
-- the right of mining
companies to strip mine everything;
-- is unresponsive to labor;
-- supports biofuels production, big agribusiness subsidies, and
the industry's rage to make all foods GMO;
-- supports the Bush
administration's energy policy; its huge subsidies and other generous
handouts;
-- backs nuclear power, loose industry regulation, and
multi-billions in subsidies;
-- supports the Paulson bailout
plan and the fraudsters that get it;
-- backs repressive
immigration legislation affecting people of color;
-- is
beholden to his corporate backers; and
-- is committed to a
pro-business agenda overall.
He steered clear of criticizing
Wall Street, and appears ready to back down on his campaign pledge to
cut taxes for earners under $200,000 and raise them on incomes over
$250,000. When asked point blank, he waffled and said this policy may be
reconsidered, which is clear evidence it's been scrubbed.
He's
reputed not to be a member of the far-to-the-right-of-center Democratic
Leadership Council (DLC), but according to its founder, Al From, he's on
board for "a good part of the strategy we have articulated over the
years." He added that Obama has an "intellectual" and "tactical"
connection to the DLC. It was clear in his first appointment - Rahm
Emanuel.
He's a key DLC member in good standing. The
organization Ralph Nader calls "corporatist (and) soulless." Governing
from the far right no different than Republicans. Founded in 1985, it
grew dominant in the party under then governor Clinton and Senators
Gore, Lieberman and John Breaux.
Its ideology is anti-labor,
anti-populist, anti-welfare, pro-business, and very amenable to
imperialism, militarism, and foreign wars. Again Ralph Nader: "To the
DLC mind, Democrats are catering to 'special interests' when they stand
up for trade unions, regulatory consumer-investor protections, a
pre-emptive peace policy overseas, pruning the bloated military budget
now devouring (the federal budget), defending Social Security from Wall
Street schemes, and pressing for universal health care coverage. So
right-wing is the DLC....that even opposing Bush's tax cuts for the
wealthy....is considered ultra-liberal and contrary to winning
campaigns."
DLC "special interests" include the rights of
blacks, Hispanics, Latino immigrants, Muslims, labor, the poor, consumer
justice groups, populism, progressivism, environmental protection,
anti-war activists, peace supporters, groups demanding corporate and war
criminals be prosecuted, and anyone believing that America should have
honest elections and be governed democratically.
Based on early
indications, these "interests" appear sidelined in a new Obama
administration. But not according to New York Times columnist Bob
Herbert in his "Take a Bow, America" article. "The nation deserves to
take (one). This is not the same place it used to be."
In his
latest Times commentary, our newest economics Nobel laureate, Paul
Krugman, agreed in calling November 4 "a date that will live in fame. If
the election of our first African-American president didn't stir you, if
it didn't leave you teary-eyed and proud of your country, there's
something wrong with you. But will the election also mark a turning
point in the actual substance of policy? Can Barak Obama really usher in
a new era of progressive policies? Yes he can."
Times writer
Frank Rich agreed as well in his article titled "It Still Felt Good the
Morning After (as) America's tears of catharsis gave way to
unadulterated joy....millions of....Americans were....waiting for a
leader. This was the week that they reclaimed their country."
It will await a future one before they realize they were fooled again.
The nation will remain in safe elitist hands. It won't get "a new New
Deal" Krugman advocates given the names being floated to serve in it who
seem to have passed under the radar screens of the above commentators.
Tom Daschle
The former Senate majority leader. Now a
special policy advisor at the Alston & Bird law firm and visiting
professor at Georgetown University's Public Policy Institute. He's also
a senior fellow at John Podesta's Center for American Progress. Possible
posts mentioned include secretary of state, health and human resources
for his work on health care, and agriculture for the same reason.
Richard Holbrooke
Another long-time insider. He twice served as
assistant secretary of state. From 1977 - 1981 under Jimmy Carter for
Asia and from 1994 - 1996 for Europe under Bill Clinton. From 1993 -
1994, he was ambassador to Germany, and from 1999 - 2001 served as UN
ambassador. It's rumored he's being considered for secretary of state, a
position he failed to get to replace Warren Christopher when Madeleine
Albright got the job as the first ever woman in it.
Richard
Lugar
A senior Republican senator and man, who as mayor of
Indianapolis in 1975, gave an impressive welcoming address to a group
assembled by this writer for an event unrelated to world or national
affairs. He's now served 30 years in the Senate where he's been chairman
of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations from 1987 - 1995 and again
from 2003 - 2007. He's been mentioned as a possible secretary of state.
Lawrence Summers
From 1982 - 1983, he served on the Reagan
administration's Council of Economic Advisors. Then in 1993 in the
Clinton administration as under-Treasury secretary for international
affairs and as Treasury secretary from 1999 - 2001. Earlier from 1991 -
1993, he was chief economist for the World Bank where he authored a
controversial memo stating that "the economic logic behind dumping a
load of toxic waste in the lowest wage country is impeccable and we
should face up to that."
Summers was later president of Harvard
University from 2001 - 2006 where controversy again dogged him. For his
contentious relations with faculty members and for suggesting that the
presence of few women in upper-level science and math positions was
because of innate differences between men and women. The combination led
to his 2006 resignation.
He now teaches at Harvard's Kennedy
School of Government, is a consultant to Goldman Sachs, and is a
managing director of the DE Shaw & Company hedge fund. His name is being
floated as the leading candidate for Treasury secretary, and as Michel
Chossudovsky states: "Putting a Hedge Fund manager (with links to the
Wall Street financial establishment) in charge of the Treasury is
tantamount to putting the fox in charge of the chicken coup," and more
evidence that Obama plans the kind of business as usual that he pledged
to get rid of.
Jon Corzine
Former CEO of Goldman Sachs
who was forced out by the current Treasury secretary, Henry Paulson, in
a palace coup. He's now New Jersey governor and according to the New
Jersey Star-Ledger "is being actively vetted by the Obama transition
team as a possible candidate for Treasury secretary in the new
administration, two New Jersey Democrats familiar with the process said
(on November 5)....Neither Corzine nor his aides would respond to a
request for comment."
Paul Volker
The former Fed
chairman from 1979 under Jimmy Carter and under Ronald Reagan until Alan
Greenspan replaced him in 1987. He's a key Obama economic advisor and
another possible Treasury secretary. Timothy Geithner, the New York Fed
chairman, is also being mentioned. He's allied with Henry Paulson and
worked closely with him on his bailout plan.
James Steinberg
An academic and political advisor, he served as deputy National
Security Advisor to Bill Clinton in his second term. He's currently dean
of the Lyndon Johnson School of Public Affairs at the University of
Texas. He's reported most likely to become National Security Advisor.
Senators John Kerry and Republican Chuck Hagel are mentioned as
possible secretary of state choices, and the AP reports that Kerry wants
the job. New Mexico governor Bill Richardson also who under Clinton was
energy secretary and UN ambassador but then broke with the Clintons to
support Obama.
Dennis Ross
The former State department
director for policy planning and special Middle East coordinator under
Clinton. Under Republicans and Democrats he's been instrumental in
shaping Middle East policy with an extreme pro-Israeli bias. He may do
it again under Obama or serve in another key role.
Susan Rice
A National Security Council member and assistant secretary of State
under Clinton. Rumored to become UN ambassador.
Some observers
think the current defense secretary Robert Gates may stay on, but an
anonymous source close to Obama discounts it. Others mentioned include
John Hamre, a former deputy defense secretary from 1997 - 2000 and
current president of the far right Center for Strategic and
International Studies (CSIS) that specializes in crisis management and
"advancing (US) global interests." Senator Jack Reed's name is also
mentioned as well as Marine general and former NATO commander Jim Jones
and general Anthony Zinni when he's available in 2010.
Penny
Pritzker
According to some, she's the most powerful woman in
America. At the least one of them and one of the richest as heiress to a
portion of the Pritzker family fortune (believed in excess of $40
billion) and its grandfathered in (free from taxation) offshore trusts.
Hundreds of them for secrecy that were set up in the Caribbean by her
grandfather Abram.
Forbes magazine did a feature 2005 story on
her saying she "was chosen by her late uncle (and family patriarch) Jay
(Pritzker) to help oversee the family's vast portfolio of investments"
that includes Hyatt hotels, other real estate investments, and 40% of
the Marmon Group after 60% was sold to Warren Buffett for $4.5 billion.
In its "Power of Penny Pritzker" article, Bloomberg called her the
"billionaire head of Barack Obama's fundraising machine (and) the person
to call when you want to 'get the job done,' says Warren Buffett," who's
had a long-standing business relationship with the family going back
decades. Today, it's with Penny, the multi-billion dollar fortune she
controls, and the enormous influence she wields in Washington as a
Democrat party insider and fund-raiser extraordinaire.
According
to Bloomberg, Penny gets much of the credit for getting Obama elected.
For "organizing the best-financed campaign in US history." For tapping
wealthy and first-time contributors through her influence, contacts, and
"no-nonsense" style.
Her controversial one also, according to
Fran Sweet, a retired Ameritech manager, who lost $100,000 in the failed
(suburban Chicago) Hinsdale-based Superior Bank that collapsed in 2001
with some $2.3 billion in assets. The result of poor lending practices,
sloppy bookkeeping, and likely fraud at a time Pritzker was on its Board
and in charge.
Superior was a predatory lender very heavily
into subprime mortgages in the late 1990s. Pritzker was one of its
originators, and some call her the "subprime queen." The doyenne of
predatory lending that cost the FDIC $700 million and depositors $65
million.
Fran Sweet for one. She calls the Pritzkers "crooks.
They don't care anything about people who spent their whole lives trying
to save." Many lost everything in Superior accounts in amounts over the
FDIC $100,000 limit.
Bloomberg reported controversy about
another Pritzker company - the credit reporting firm TransUnion. "It
controls the $3.3 billion market in equal shares with Atlanta-based
Equifax and Dublin-based Experian Group Ltd. After widespread consumer
complaints about shoddy service in the credit checking industry, the US
Congress passed legislation in 2003 that allowed people to get free
copies of credit reports so they could check for mistakes and block
information obtained from identity theft."
"That same year, a
jury awarded Judy Thomas of Klamath Falls, Oregon, $5.3 million after
she claimed TransUnion took six years to correct a mistake in her credit
report." On appeal, it was reduced to $1.3 million.
Pritzker
will have a seat at the table in the new Obama administration. Not an
appointed one but powerfully behind the scenes. The accustomed role she
prefers in business and politics.
More on the Obama
Administration Taking Shape
Many other prominent current or
former Democrats will be chosen for the new administration. Possibly
some Republicans as well. In the coming days, names will be announced
and things will begin taking shape. But hold the cheers. They'll all be
insiders on the same page, committed to the same agenda. Tackling the
current financial/economic crisis as top priority plus continued
imperialism, militarism, corporatism, neoliberalism, and no more for the
public than urgencies and expediency dictate.
The same failed
fundamentalism that's been around for decades with maybe some
(temporary) softening around the edges given the severity of the current
crisis. So dire it's impossible to avoid providing something in the form
of aid. Enough to constrain growing anger and maintain the fiction of a
progressive new era. Its arrival has been postponed for a date to be
named later under a leader who's yet to be chosen.
Obama's First
Order of Business
The "urgent priority" of the severe financial
crisis. What economist Nouriel Roubini calls "The Economic Mess and
Financial Disaster that Obama Will Inherit." A sign progressivism will
have to wait until it's arrested and cleared up. But no short-term fix
will do it. Perhaps not even a longer-term one given the extent of the
damage and no assurance new policy choices will improve on current
dubious ones.
Roubini believes that the nation is in more dire
straits than anything seen in decades. He calls it:
"the most
severe recession in 50 years; the worst financial and banking crisis
since the Great Depression; a ballooning fiscal deficit that may be as
high as a trillion dollars in 2009 and 2010."
Given $2 trillion
in announced borrowing; around another $1.8 trillion in loans,
investments and commitments; and whatever fiscal stimulus is added this
year and next, the total looks to be much higher.
On top of a
"huge current account deficit; a financial system that is in a severe
crisis and where deleveraging is still occurring at a very rapid pace,
thus causing a worsening of the credit crunch; a household sector where
millions of (them) are insolvent, into negative equity territory and on
the verge of losing their homes; a serious risk of deflation as the
slack in goods, labor and commodity markets becomes deeper; the risk
that we will end in a deflationary liquidity trap as the Fed is fast
approaching the zero-bound constraint for the Fed Funds rate; the risk
of a severe debt deflation as the real value of nominal liabilities will
rise given price deflation while the value of financial assets is still
plunging. This is the bitter gift that the Bush administration has
bequeathed to Obama and the Democrats."
New macro data supports
the dire state of things. It's been "worse than awful: collapsing retain
sales and consumption, free fall in capex spending, sharply falling
production," employment as well, "housing still in free fall and home
prices bound to fall 40% from the peak, collapsing auto sales, forward
looking business and consumer confidence indicators dropping to
multi-decade lows, sharp surge in corporate defaults, a wrecked banking
and financial system that will have to be partially nationalized."
Overall the most daunting economic and financial challenges since FDR in
the Great Depression, and adding to it, the rest of the world as bad
off. Severe recession is hitting Europe, Japan and other advanced
countries. China risks a hard landing. So do many emerging economies. A
severe global recession and financial crisis are certain. We're already
in it despite some observers still in denial. Especially on its severity
and likely duration.
According to Roubini, "the US and global
recession train has left the station." The financial and banking one as
well. It will be long and severe for at least two years regardless of
the best of policy actions going forward. Stock market rallies are
deceptive. They're classic bear market ones. At a time when 2009
earnings projections are "delusional." Projected to rise 15% from 2008
when, if fact, they'll fall off sharply. Roubini thinks the S & P 500
could drop as low as 600 or over one-third lower than its 931 valuation
on November 7. And if things are worse than expected, 500 may be a
bottoming low. It's no exaggeration to say the downside risks are
significant at a time of severe economic contraction.
"The worst
is ahead of us rather than behind us." Beware of excessive optimism that
each time has been wrong. A severe meltdown possibility may have passed
but it's not out of the question if poor future policy choices are made.
That's for the new Obama team to avoid plus having to deal with whatever
else the Bush administration does in its final weeks. It's botched
things so badly up to now so there's no telling how much more piling on
they'll do into January. Whatever happens until then, they'll be no joy
in 2009, and no simple task for the ablest of appointees or assurance
that their best efforts will work.
Stephen Lendman
is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization. He
lives in Chicago and can be reached at
lendmanstephen@sbc
global.net.
Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com
and listen to The Global Research News Hour on RepublicBroadcasting
Mondays from 11AM - 1PM US Central time for cutting-edge discussions of
world and national topics with distinguished guests. All programs are
archived for easy listening.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=10861
Fair Use
Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the
use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this
constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for
in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
Section 107, the material on this site is
distributed without profit to those
who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information
for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of
your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
copyright owner.