| 
 Al-Jazeerah History
 
 Archives
 
 Mission & Name
 
 Conflict Terminology
 
 Editorials
 
 Gaza Holocaust
 
 Gulf War
 
 Isdood
 
 Islam
 
 News
 
 News Photos
 
 Opinion 
	
	
	Editorials
 
 US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)
 
 www.aljazeerah.info
 
         |  | 
      
        
          |   Israel's Lethal 
			Hold Over the United States By Paul J. BallesRedress, May 29, 2008 Paul 
			J. Balles considers the cost to the USA of its open-ended support of 
			Israel. He urges scholars and journalists to join the likes of John 
			Mearsheimer, Stephen Walt and James Petras in exposing the cost of 
			the pro-Israel lobby to America and the American people.
 
 Here's a timeline without times, but with the order of things:
 
 Israel wants to rid occupied Palestine of the Palestinians. It's 
			called ethnic cleansing.
 
 Israel can't get rid of the Palestinians as long as there's a threat 
			of missile attacks from Arab or Islamic countries assumed to be 
			hostile.
 
 Arab countries like Iraq, or Islamic countries like Iran, assumed to 
			be hostile, would not use weapons of mass destruction against Israel 
			as long as Palestinians would also be massacred.
 
 The potential threat must be eliminated, according to Israel who 
			once bombed a nuclear plant in Iraq in a pre-emptive attack to 
			remove an assumed potential threat.
 
 Israel insists that America hasn't done enough to eliminate the 
			threat to Israel from two of the members of Bush's "axis of evil" – 
			Iraq and Iran.
 
 America ignores the potential cost to Americans to satisfy the 
			wishes of Israel. The costs are great  not only the costs of 
			military occupation, but the loss of a potential oil source that 
			could have kept the price of oil down to 40 dollars a barrel.
 
 Dr Salameh, director of the UK-based Oil Market Consultancy Service, 
			says:
 
 
 
				
					| Iraq had offered the United States a 
					deal, three years before the war, that would have opened up 
					10 new giant oil fields on 'generous' terms in return for 
					the lifting of sanctions. This would certainly have 
					prevented the steep rise of the oil price, but the US had a 
					different idea. It planned to occupy Iraq and annex its oil. |  Iran is developing nuclear power. Israel insists that America 
			sponsor sanctions against Iran leading to bombing of Iran's nuclear 
			plants, "Everything is on the table," says the American leadership.
 
 Why? Iran is no threat to America. Journalist Charley Reese asks:
 
 
 
				
					| So what are the capabilities of Iran? 
					It has no nuclear weapons. We have about 3,000 or more. One 
					American submarine could destroy the entire country of Iran 
					and its population. Iran has no missiles that could reach 
					us. It has no aircraft that could reach us. Its army 
					couldn't even defeat Iraq. |  "Why has the United States been willing to set aside its own 
			security and that of many of its allies in order to advance the 
			interests of another state?" ask scholars 
			
			John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt. 
			Their answer: the influence of the pro-Israel lobby.
 
 In the two years since Mearsheimer and Walt published their study, 
			it hasn't been successfully challenged but, even more significantly, 
			it hasn't affected any reduction in the influence of the Israeli 
			lobby.
 
 All of the timeline items and comments mentioned above have been 
			observed and recorded by highly respected scholars and journalists 
			in foreign journals or newspapers and on the Internet.
 
 One of those scholars is James Petras, whose book 
			
			The Power of Israel in the United States 
			should have been a best-selling guide to correcting the "influence 
			problem" in America. It has added to the verbal artillery of those 
			of us who would like to see real change.
 
 Petras asks, "Who benefited from the 
			Iraq war? His answer: "The only major beneficiary of the war has 
			been the state of Israel." He provides a thorough analysis and 
			incontrovertible evidence to support that conclusion.
 
 Professor Petras makes it equally clear that "Israel's political and 
			military leadership have repeatedly and openly declared their 
			preparation to militarily attack Iran in the immediate future. 
			Again, the support offered by Petras is conclusive.
 
 When are other scholars and journalists going to join the truth 
			seekers and speak out? If they're believers in the truth, they 
			should join together in their willingness to resist the naysayers 
			and lobbyists. Costly silence is inexcusable.
 
 Paul J. 
				Balles is a retired 
				American university professor and freelance writer who has lived 
				in the Middle East for many years. For more information, see
				
				http://www.pballes.com.
 |  |  |  |