Obama Capitulates to the Israel Lobby
By Justin Raimondo
Anti-War, June 16, 2008
Editor's note: Justin Raimondo is traveling. His column will
return Wednesday.
Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert's visit to the U.S. is
part of a concerted effort, by the Israeli government and its
American lobbyists, to convince U.S. lawmakers – and, most of all,
President George W. Bush – that the time to attack Iran is now. The
Israeli newspaper Yediot Achronot
reports that Olmert will tell Bush "time is running out" on
diplomacy and that he'd better launch an attack.
In his speech to the AIPAC conference, Olmert's
message was harsh and unrelenting: Iran, he said, "must be
stopped by all possible means" from acquiring a nuclear capability.
Yes, sanctions must be tightened, but these are only "initial
steps": what's needed, he averred, are "more drastic and robust
measures" – and that can only mean
one thing.
Israel would rather not act alone, but Olmert signaled that he
was willing to do so if pushed: ""Israel will not tolerate the
possibility of a nuclear Iran, and neither should any other country
in the free world," he declared, in what was clearly a threat of
unilateral action. Citing Israel's record in regard to
Iraq in the eighties and
Syria last
year, Tim Butcher
warned in the Telegraph: "The speech shortens the odds
significantly on military action against Iran's nuclear program."
The U.S. would almost certainly be drawn into the conflict if
Israel carried out its threat, and Olmert knows that. So does Bush,
who, in any case, may not need much persuading. After all, in his
speech to the Israeli parliament last month, the President
declared:
"Permitting the world's leading sponsor of terror to possess the
world's deadliest weapons would be an unforgivable betrayal for
future generations. For the sake of peace, the world must not allow
Iran to have a nuclear weapon."
For the sake of peace, we must make war: a
familiar refrain that echoes
down through
the years, mocking the living and the dead.
The clock is ticking, and time is running out for the War Party:
they must get in their licks before the most
pro-Israel president,
ever, leaves office. As Butcher writes: "Among Israeli
supporters of military action against Iran there is concern
something must be done before Mr. Bush's end of office next January
as Mr. Bush is perceived as closer to Israel than any potential
successor."
Pre-Order this Book
Don't look to Barack Obama for deliverance from this looming
conflict. In his speech to AIPAC, he clearly signed on to the
Lobby's latest project,
departing from his prepared
text to declare:
"I will do everything in my power to prevent Iran from obtaining
a nuclear weapon. Everything in my power. Everything."
"Everything" includes murdering tens of thousands of Iranians,
mostly civilians – driving the price of oil up above $300 a barrel
and destroying the US economy – and involving us in a war that
will
make the Iraq conflict look like a Sunday school picnic. And for
what?
The irony,
of course, is that Iran
is nowhere
near obtaining nuclear weapons, as
the
President's own intelligence agencies
recently informed him: but no matter. That's a
small obstacle to those who
disdain "the reality-based community," and see themselves as
Making History while the rest of us watch,
helpless and
aghast. As Ha'aretz recently
reported
"Olmert will try to convince Bush to set aside the National
Intelligence Estimate on Iran's nuclear program in favor of data
presented by Israel, and determine the administration's policy on
Iran accordingly."
The coming war with Iran has
nothing to do with "weapons of mass destruction" – no
more than the invasion of Iraq
ever did. It's
all about preserving
Israeli hegemony
in the Middle East by wiping any and all recalcitrant Arab-Muslim
states
off the map. First Iraq, then Iran – and Syria will have its
turn
soon enough, along with poor prostrate
Lebanon, once the jewel of the eastern Mediterranean and now an
economic and political basket case.
It is almost certain we will be at war with Iran before a new
President is inaugurated: now that Obama has capitulated to the
Lobby, nothing but Divine Providence can stop it.
God help us all.
I have to say I was wrong –
dead wrong
– about Obama. In my eagerness to find a bright spot in a rapidly
darkening world, I grasped on to his alluring rhetoric and his
at-times trenchant critique of the Bush foreign policy, like a
sinking man holding on to a life-jacket. But looking for hope in all
the wrong places doesn't create opportunities for peace – it only
prolongs our illusions. We must face the prospect of a much more
terrible conflict than we have ever known, and look it squarely in
the face, without flinching or looking for false messiahs. I know
many of you are disappointed, and some of you are now exclaiming "I
told you so!" All that we can do now is hope, and pray, that our
country – and the Iranian people – will somehow survive the coming
catastrophe.
http://antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=12944
|