| 
									TOPIC: MISSILE DEFENSE
									 
 
									A new analysis by 
									George N. Lewis and Theodore A. Postol in 
									the May/June 2008 Bulletin of the Atomic 
									Scientists reveals that the 
									configuration of the proposed U.S. missile 
									defense system in Europe will not adequately 
									protect the continental United States or 
									Europe against the postulated threat--an 
									Iranian ballistic missile equipped with a 
									nuclear warhead. Specific findings include:
									
										Download:
									
									The European missile defense folly (PDF 2.3 
									MB)The system's centerpiece radar, 
										slated for the Czech Republic, is 
										substantially underpowered, rendering it 
										ineffective unless upgraded or replaced.
										To compensate for this shortcoming, 
										the controversial U.S. radar in Vardo, 
										Norway will likely be a part of the 
										system. Despite U.S. claims to the contrary, 
										defense installations in the Czech 
										Republic and Poland are ideally suited 
										to counter Russian missiles.  
 George N. Lewis 
									A physicist, Lewis is associate director of 
									the
									
									Peace Studies Program at Cornell 
									University. His expertise is in missile 
									defense technology, the proliferation of 
									ballistic missiles, and nuclear arms 
									control.
										PARTICIPANTS
										 
 Theodore A. Postol A 
									professor of science, technology, and 
									national security policy at MIT,
									
									Postol is a leading authority on missile 
									defense who previously served as scientific 
									adviser to the Chief of Naval Operations.
 
 
 
 
										RELATED MATERIAL
										 
 
										BY RICHARD L. GARWIN 
										Although the Bush administration is 
										campaigning for ballistic missile 
										defense in Europe, it's unlikely Iran 
										will possess any time soon a 
										nuclear-armed missile capability such a 
										defense would combat.  
 
										BY DAVID WRIGHT AND LISBETH GRONLUND 
										The legacy of the former U.S. 
										president's speech and the continued 
										attempts to realize its dream remain 
										strong today. 
 
										BY HUGH GUSTERSON 
										Washington is either misleading the 
										public about the purpose of its European 
										missile defense installations or 
										uninformed about the program's 
										capabilities. Whatever the case, 
										productive dialogue suffers. 
									 |  | 
									DIAL-IN INFORMATION
									 
 
									Date: Tuesday, April 29, 2008Time: 10:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. EST (14:30:00 
									GMT)
 
 U.S. Callers: 888-262-0101
 International Callers:
 973-807-0443
 
 
 
									MODERATOR
									 
 |