The oil
connection in
Iraq
war: Greenspan states the obvious
By
Abdus Sattar Ghazali
ccun.org,
September 21, 2007
Alan Greenspan, the former Federal
Reserve Bank Chairman has bluntly declared that the
Iraq
war was 'largely' about oil. Critics of the administration have often
argued that while President George Bush cited President Saddam Hussein's
pursuit of weapons of mass destruction - which were never found - and his
support for terrorism as reasons for the invasion, he was also motivated
by a desire to gain access to Iraq's vast oil reserves. In his book, The
Age of Turbulence: Adventures in a New World Greenspan writes: “I am
saddened that it is politically inconvenient to acknowledge what everyone
knows: the
Iraq
war is largely about oil.”
Greenspan
states the obvious. It is easy to explain the mechanics of the oil war in
Iraq
. Before the war,
Iraq
's oil production and reserves lay outside the
direct control of the US/UK oil industry. The major international oil
companies, headquartered in the
United States
and the
United Kingdom
, are keen to regain control over
Iraq
’s oil, lost with the nationalization in
1972.
Oil has been the prime mover
behind any and every political decision in that region since the First
World War, when tanks, planes and trucks replaced horses and camels. So,
once the internal combustion engine became the technological centerpiece
of the century, keeping it going by any means necessary became a most
profitable business venture.
In addition to the
current
US
war in
Iraq
which claimed more than one million Iraqi lives according to a recent
British report, there have been six Petroleum Wars to get the Iraqi oil,
according to James A. Paul of the International
Policy Monitoring Group. The six wars were:
1. Colonial Conquest (1914-18): The
first conflict took place during World War I, when the British captured
the area from the
Ottoman Empire
during a bloody four-year campaign.
2. War of Pacification (1918-1930): To
defend its oil interests,
Britain
fought a long war of pacification in
Iraq
, lasting from 1918 throughout the next decade. The British crushed a
country-wide insurrection in 1920 and continued to strike at insurgents
with poison gas, airplanes, incendiary bombs, and mobile armored cars,
using an occupation force drawn largely from the Indian Army.
3. Re-Occupation (1941): Though Britain
granted nominal independence to
Iraq
in 1932, it maintained a sizeable military force and a large air base in
the country and continued to rule “indirectly.” In 1941, fearful that
Iraq
might fall into the hands of the Axis,
London
again decided to seize direct control of the country through military
force.
4. Iran-Iraq War (1980-88): In 1980,
Iraq
attacked its neighbor,
Iran
. A long war ensued through 1988, a savage conflict causing hundreds of
thousands of casualties on both sides, costing tens of billions of dollars
and destroying much of both countries’ oilfields and vital
infrastructure. Foreign governments, interested in gaining geo-strategic
advantage over both nations’ oil resources, promoted, encouraged and
sustained the war, some arming both sides. The
US
and the
UK
supplied
Iraq
with arms, chemical and biological weapon precursors, military training,
satellite targeting and naval support. Other powers participated as well,
notably
France
,
Germany
and
Russia
. The big oil companies profited mightily, as war conditions kept Iraqi
and Iranian oil off the market, driving worldwide prices substantially
higher.
5. Gulf War (1991): Following the Iraqi
invasion of
Kuwait
in August 1990, the
US
decided to intervene militarily and
Washington
assembled a number of secondary military partners, including the
UK
and
France
. As
US
President George Bush summed up the oil-centered threat posed by Saddam
Hussein at the time: “Our jobs, our way of life, our own freedom and the
freedom of friendly countries around the world would all suffer if control
of the world’s great oil reserves fell into the hands of Saddam
Hussein.”
6. Low Intensity Conflict during the
Sanction Period (1991-2003): After the armistice, the UN’s pre-war
embargo continued, because the US-UK used their Security Council vetoes to
block its lifting.
Oil in
Iraq
is especially attractive to the big international oil companies because of
three factors, namely high quality or high value product, exceptionally
low production costs, yielding a high per barrel profit and huge supplies.
Iraq
’s proven oil reserves in 2002 were listed at 112.5 billion barrels,
about 11% of the world total. The Energy Information Administration of the
US Department of Energy has estimated that Iraqi reserves could possibly
total over 400 billion barrels. If new exploration fulfills such high-end
predictions,
Iraq
’s reserves could prove close to those of
Saudi Arabia
, now listed at 260 billion barrels but likely also to go considerably
higher as well.
It
is not surprising that the Iraq Study Group report last December called
for opening
Iraq
to privatize foreign oil and energy companies,
providing direct technical assistance for the "drafting" of a
new national oil law for
Iraq
. The ISG said: “Expanding oil production in
Iraq
over the long term will require creating
corporate structures, establishing management systems, and installing
competent managers to plan and oversee an ambitious list of major
oil-field investment projects….The
United States
should encourage investment in
Iraq
’s oil sector by the international community
and by international energy companies.”
It may be recalled that
President Bush hired an employee from the
U.S.
consultancy firm Bearing Point Inc. to advise the Iraq Oil Ministry on the
drafting and passage of a new national oil law that was opposed by all
sections of Iraqi society. Given the levels of resistance to the very
idea, this work was conducted in secret and took until the end of 2006 to
complete.
By
the time
Iraq
's parliamentarians saw their first draft of
the oil law, it had already been reviewed and commented on by U.S. Energy
Secretary Sam Bodman, who arranged for nine major oil companies, including
Shell, BP, ExxonMobil, ChevronTexaco and ConocoPhillips, to comment on the
draft.
Among the most controversial elements
of the proposed law are: (1) The Iraqi government would not have control
over oil company operations inside
Iraq
. Any disputes would be referred instead to pro-industry international
arbitration panels. (2) No contracts would be public documents. (3) The
law would allow the oil companies to fully repatriate all profits from oil
sales, almost insuring that the proceeds would not be reinvested in the
Iraqi economy. (4) Contacting companies would not be obliged to hire Iraqi
workers, and could pursue the current policy of employing American
technicians and South Asian manual laborers.
When
Iraq
's council of ministers last July suddenly approved the law, critics of
various stripes united in opposition. Shiite and Sunni political parties
alike denounced it, vowed to defeat it, even threatened to ensure
Parliament can't take it up.
At this point, progress on the oil laws
is stalled in
Baghdad
. The Kurds last August passed
their own oil legislation, setting up what has the potential to
become a whole new front in
Iraq
's multifaceted civil conflict. Senior Kurdish officials -- most of whom
are separatists -- have vowed
to block any legislation that doesn't include extensive
regional autonomy over oil contracting, an issue opposed by most Iraqis
and a serious problem for Iraqi nationalists.
Kurdish Regional Government is directly
negotiating contracts for oil exploration with the Western oil companies.
And the Dallas-based Hunt Oil Company has become the first international
company to receive permission to drill for oil in the
Kurdistan
region of
Northern Iraq
. Under its contract with the Kurdistan Regional Government, Hunt will
join the Impulse Energy Corporation to survey for oil in the Dihok
district this year before drilling its first well in 2008, according to a
Hunt Oil statement last week.
The Chairman
of Hunt Oil is none other than Ray Lee Hunt
whom President Bush appointed to the President’s Foreign Intelligence
Advisory Board that advices the President concerning the quality and
adequacy of intelligence collection, of counterintelligence and of other
intelligence activities.
Abdus Sattar Ghazali is the Executive
Editor of the online magazine American Muslim Perspective: www.amperspective.com
|