June 2007 News Links
June 2007 News Photos
June
2007 Opinion Editorial Links
|
|
Bush
Talks Long-Term Stay in
Iraq
and More Troops Die
By
Kevin Zeese
ccun.org,
June 27, 2007
As
President Bush and members of his administration described the
“South Korea Model” as an approach for
Iraq
, deaths in
Iraq
mounted. In the same week General Patraeus said he saw a ten
year stay in Iraq as likely and Ted Koppel reported that Sen.
Clinton will not remove the troops. The message not
only reverberated in
Washington
,
DC
but also in
Baghdad
.
Last week 30
U.S. troops were killed – an average of more than four deaths per day,
not long ago the average was two per day. Bush administration comments on a
long-term stay come at a time when
U.S.
soldiers are at greater risk due to the surge in
Iraq
. Not only are U.S. soldiers dying at an increasingly rapid rate but attacks
on the Green Zone are also escalating with mortars hitting inside every
day, often multiple times per day.
If it were not clear that the U.S.
is staying from the massive U.S. embassy that dominates the Baghdad
skyline, or then billion dollar, long-term
military bases the U.S. is building or the multi-decade
long oil contracts that U.S. oil companies are negotiating, now they can
take it right out of the comments of administration officials – the U.S.
has tens of thousands of troops and long-term bases in Korea and that is the
model that the Bush administration says it is considering for Iraq.
This is not the first time that the words of the commander in chief have
resulted in the deaths of
U.S.
soldiers. His famous “Bring em on” comment to the
resistance to the occupation had the same impact as the current comments on
applying the “Korea Model” to
Iraq
.
<!--[endif]-->
Comments
of a long-term stay come after 144 members of the 275 member Iraqi
Parliament signed a petition
urging withdrawal and after a majority passed a bill requiring
the Prime Minister to get the Parliament’s approval before telling the
UN to extend the occupation. Thus, as the Iraqi
Parliament is taking steps to end the occupation, the Bush administration is
talking about a multi-decade stay.
<!--[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]-->
<!--[endif]-->
And,
if Iraqis are watching
U.S.
politics closely they may have heard Ted Koppel report on NPR that Hillary
Clinton’s top foreign policy adviser told him that Sen.
Clinton will not remove the troops in her first term or her second term.
Further, he reported that no leading Democratic candidate is likely
to remove the troops. Thus, there a widening disconnect between Iraqi
government officials and the
U.S.
political leadership.
This open talk of the “Korea Model” also comes at a time when more and
more troops are going
AWOL, speaking out against the war and refusing to return to
Iraq
or follow orders in
Iraq
. More than a year ago 72%
of the troops said the U.S. should withdraw in a year, now more and more
troops are becoming vocal in their opposition to the war and their lack
faith in their commander in chief.
<!--[if !supportLineBreakNewLine]-->
<!--[endif]-->
The
military recognizes that troops who speak out against the war are a serious
problem for them because they are among the most powerful spokespersons
against the war. Vets strike at the heart of the fund the ‘we must
support the troops’ arguments of
Washington
politicians.
At a meeting last week to plan escalating actions against the war by vets,
the Chairman of Iraq Veterans Against the War, Garret Reppenhagen made the
point “Funding the war is killing the troops.” The Marines have
already taken action against one Marine, Adam Kokesh. The Marines were
criticized by Veterans
of Foreign Wars, a vet group with 2.5 million members, for threatening
the free speech rights of vets. The Marines did discipline Kokesh,
giving him a general discharge under honorable conditions, but backed away
from taking away any of his veterans benefits.
Two other vets who are leaders in the anti-war movement are also being
threatened with discipline. Marine Vet Liam Madden, who while in the
service was a co-founder of Appeal for Redress – a group organizing active
duty troops who oppose the war, is being threatened with discipline for
saying that the Iraq War was a “war of aggression under Nuremberg
principles” and that “war crimes are being committed in Iraq.”
And, former Air Force Chaplain, Rev. Lennox Yearwood, who has been
participating in demonstrations in
Washington
,
DC
and around the country, is being threatened with discipline for “conduct
unbecoming of an officer” for his anti-war activity – even though he has
been out of the service for four years. Both officers welcome the
attention of the military and plan to escalate their anti-war activities.
The public in the
U.S.
is getting more strongly opposed to the war, the Iraqi political leadership
is demonstrating its’ opposition to the occupation and more and more
U.S.
troops are speaking out. The disconnect between the
U.S.
political leadership and these key stakeholders is becoming more and more
evident. This occupation is becoming more difficult to justify.
|
|
|