Cross-Cultural Understanding

www.ccun.org

Opinion Editorials, July 2007

 

 

Opinion Editorials

News

News Photos

 

 

Red Mosque, Lal Masjid, Incident and Beyond 

By Mokarram Hossain

ccun.org, July 14, 2007

 

Since last few days, Lal Masjid (red mosque in Islamabad, Pakistan) issue is the talk not only in Indian subcontinent but also around the Globe. Who are responsible for this bloodshed? Only Ghazi brothers? Madrasa education? Dictator Musharraf? Western Interests for ’great game’? 

Many believe this incident has far reaching implications in Indian subcontinent geopolitics and for Islamic education. Western media and cohorts of Musharraf merely say, its  a result of intolerant, backdated  Islamic education and acts of some ‘bigots’. In this sense, Abdul Rashid Ghazi and his adherent are solely responsible. Kidnapping foreigners and law enforcers, use of women and children as human shield, try to impose self-styled Sharia law, are dogmatic acts for which ‘mad mullahs’ should be punished. Nobody can take the law in its own hand in the name of Islam. These visionless so-called extremists want to impose Islamic Sharia in Islamabad and surroundings. How funny! Who gives them mandate to do that? These activities of theirs not only tarnish the peaceful and tolerant stand of Islam but also justify the Western media propaganda that Islam is not compatible with democracy, rule of  law and human rights. Western media gets one more timely issue to wage crusade against Islamic education in the subcontinent.  

 The scene is merely created by some ‘mad mullahs’ and extremist ‘foreign fighters’ may not be the fact. There are stories behind the story. First of all, we can say, the standoff of the Lal Masjid did not develop within few days.

It started in January 2007. The government cannot absolve itself of the tragedy. If it wanted, the matter could have been resolved at the beginning. General Musharaf wants to achieve some short  term goals by elevating the standoff to the Zenith but the men behind the machine who back the General may consummate some far reaching goals.  

The military dictator wants to bring the issue to it’s peak and detonate it at the time when he needs. Yes, tyrant gets honeymoon time, while he  is dealing with Lal Majsid issue  in Islamabad, ARD(Alliance for the Restoration of Democracy), a conglomeration of  major democratic forces in Pakistan,  is conducting a series of meetings with different opposition political parties in London (Daily Dawn, 8 July 2007). Timely, he gets an issue to divert the people attention from the opposition parties ongoing anti-military regime movement.  

Is Govt really serious to resolve the issue peacefully at the early stage or later? 

If it wanted to solve the dead lock peacefully, they could easily block the essential  supplies of the Masjid  i.e. foods, electricity, water etc for several days even several months. Using these tactics and other modern intelligent ways, they could flush out the so-called ‘foreign fighters’. We saw lot of situations where all out blockade and 'wait & see' strategy solved many problems without bloodshed. In case of Lal Masjid, we didn’t see such type of peaceful use of power instead of using some modern machinery against its own people.

How did it possible to pile up arms and ammunitions by madrasa students including rocket launchers, grenades, cannon in an area (Lal Masjid) which is few hundred meters from intelligence (ISI) head office and  supreme court building? Lal Masjid is a government owned mosque in  capital city and all of it’s employee including Rashid Ghazi and so called militants were employed by the Gen. Musharaf’s govt.  

According to newspaper reports, some high official were involved to supply the arms. “ One well known television journalist has recently written in a newspaper column that he was told by a senior government official that Lal Masjid's arms suppliers had been arrested by the police some time back but they were released after intervention from higher authorities. If this claim is true, answers need to be given as to why this was done (The Daily Times, 11 July 2007).  

 At the eleventh hour, authority initiates a ‘dialogue’ to solve the crisis ‘peacefully’. Everything was about to settle down," Qari Hanif Jalindhrai, a member of the delegation, told a news conference along with Grand Mufti of Pakistan Maulana Rafi Usmani."Maulana Ghazi had agreed to our formula that he would be shifted to his home town, and tried by the courts," he added."However, when the draft of the proposed formula was sent to President House, it was rejected, and a new draft was given to us asking Maulana Ghazi to surrender," Jalindhrai recalled (Aljazeera online, 11 July 2007). “The government could have held a longer dialogue. We can sit and have dialogues with the Indians, why couldn't we talk to these people? They are fellow Muslims” lamented a Pakistani in Islamabad (BBC, 11 July 2007).  

One horror but interesting event in the “Operation Silence”, is use of military forces and type of armaments.” For the first time in the history of Pakistan, our own security forces not only bombarded a mosque and religious seminary, but also brought in armored personnel carriers, tanks and helicopter gunships in numbers that made you wonder” (Islam, 11 July 2007).

The dictator was interested to utter the language of guns instead of following any peaceful way in order to appease his allies in ‘war on terror ‘. Lal Masjid ‘mullahs’ give him an issue, that’s enough for the General to subversive the people  and to show  the West as the most ‘reliant boy’ to fight against religious jingoism. The United States and most Western countries have traditionally dealt with   Pakistan according to short-term interests. The West adopted a more lenient attitude toward Pakistan’s military regime as a moderate stalwart against Islamic extremism " (Rethinking Western Strategies Toward Pakistan, Carnegie Endowment, 2007).  

May be US and its allies want to see the ‘kargil boy’ again in power as their strategy towards Muslim countries is to see these without democracy. ” The United States has generally accepted the fiction that repression in the Muslim world is the best way to prevent Islamism from growing as a threat to the West and to US interests “(Islam and Democracy, USIP special report, Sept 2002).  

Musharaf achieved or may achieve what he wants. But what are the perennial implications of Lal Masjid incedent? To envisage one long-term implication,

we have to be aware  of the comments of US influential senator John McCain in  an interview with CNN Late Edition, “US wants to bar the flow of  money from Oil-rich Islamic countries to any Islamic Madrasa/education institute  especially to the Indian subcontinent (CNN Late Edition, June 2004). Lal Masjid incident will add fuel to materialize the ‘expectation’ of Mr McCain.

After the pathetic event, the situation may discourage the parents to send their beloved children to  any Islamic seminary. On the other hand Pakistan govt and Western power will put more pressure on   Middle East and other rich Muslim countries not to release any money, mainly the donations of generous Muslim folks, to the impoverished Indian subcontinent Islamic institutes.

The situation is taking a sensitive turn in North West Frontier Province (NWFP) and tribal areas in reaction to the red mosque operation (The Daily News, 11 July 2007). The Ghazi family  belongs to the Baloch Mazari, a warrior tribe from southern Punjab and north-eastern Balochistan and most of the madrasa students are also from tribal areas. It will instigate the instability and tension in NWFP, Balochistan and other tribal  areas . The ‘great game’ that US and its allies want to play is to secure the  flow of Central Asian Oil and other natural resources in future through Afghanistan (Islam, Oil, and Geopolitics in Central Asia after September 11, APCSS Publication, 2006).

They need to secure not only Afghanistan(land-locked country without direct access to sea port) but also Pakistan’s strategic Gwadar sea port with some parts of NWFP and Balochistan. Tribal-inspired  cessation in those areas  is a part of the ‘great game’.  Ironically, some visionless extremists coupling with tyrants are dancing  to materialize the ‘great game’.  

 

*Writer: PhD Student,

Technical University of Kaiserslautern, Germany

e-mail: mokarram76@yahoo.com

 

 
 

 

 

Opinions expressed in various sections are the sole responsibility of their authors and they may not represent ccun.org.

editor@ccun.org