British Capitulation to Israel: 
		Arresting Shaikh Raed Salah, While Allowing 
		Israeli War Criminal 
      
      
        Amir Peretz to Evade Arrest Warrant
		
		Salah trial postponed, suspected Israeli war criminal flees 
		country
		PIC, [ 06/07/2011 - 02:41 PM ] 
LONDON, (PIC)-- 
		British authorities have postponed the appeal hearing of Shaikh Raed 
		Salah, leader of the Islamic Movement in occupied Palestine (called 
		Israel by Zionists and their slaves), due to the absence of a judge that 
		has the power to decide in his case.
Shaikh Salah was detained a 
		week ago under a travel ban that he learned about after entering the 
		country to give a series of lectures.
Meantime, Israeli media 
		sources say former Israeli Minister of Security Amir Peretz managed to 
		evade an arrest warrant for war crimes issued in the UK as he was 
		scheduled to lecture at the London University.
Shaikh Salah chose 
		to remain in the UK to challenge the deportation decision which was 
		based on allegations of anti-Semitism.
Authorities have allowed 
		Salah legal visitation and his lawyers met with him for two hours 
		without barriers in the Bedford immigration detention center.
		Zahi Nujaidat, a lawyer and spokesman of the Islamic Movement in 
		1984-occupied Palestine, expressed optimism regarding Salah’s case. He 
		said that if Salah wanted to comply with British orders he could have 
		left for his country at any moment.
Nujaidat also said Salah 
		wants to challenge not only the injustice that has happened to him 
		personally, but the Zionist ideology that surrounds his persecution.
		
Salah’s arrest comes just months after the UK approved a law that 
		would grant immunity to Israeli war criminals who travel to the country. 
		The former law in England saw that arrest warrants would be issued 
		against suspected war criminals who enter the country.
Israeli 
		newspaper Yediot Aharonoth said former Israeli security minister Amir 
		Peretz was able to escape from England from an arrest warrant over 
		charges of committing war crimes during Israel’s 2006 war with Lebanon.
		
Peretz was in England to speak after being advised by the so-called 
		Israeli justice and foreign ministries not to go as activists in the UK 
		would push for an arrest warrant to be issued against him.
		Despite that, Peretz ignored the warnings and traveled to London.
		
The source said he was forced to cancel the lecture at London 
		University after learning that a warrant had in fact been issued.
		
He was able to evade arrest and flee the country before police got 
		to him, according to the source. 
		Hamas condemns Britain for bowing to Zionist lobby 
		
		[ 06/07/2011 - 06:00 PM ] 
		GAZA, (PIC)-- 
		Hamas strongly condemned the British government for overlooking the 
		arrest of Zionist war criminal Amer Peretz, the former Israeli war 
		minister, while fabricating pretexts to arrest Shaikh Raed Salah, the 
		leader of Islamic movement in occupied Palestine.
		It said in a statement on Wednesday that Peretz has been wanted for 
		years by British and European courts over charges of committing war 
		crimes.
		“The British government’s behavior reflects its bias (actually 
		servitude) to Israel and posed as a moral scandal that reflects its 
		bowing to pressure to the Zionist lobby. It also reflected a double 
		standard when it comes to the Palestine cause,” Hamas said.
		The Movement called on human rights groups to expose this British 
		policy and to press for the immediate release of Shaikh Salah.
		Ra-ed Salah is not racist, the Zionists are 
		[ 04/07/2011 - 10:36 PM ] 
By Khalid Amayreh in occupied East 
		Jerusalem
The arrest by the British authorities last week of 
		Shaikh Ra-ed Salah, one of the prominent leaders of the 1.7 
		million-strong Palestinian community (in occupied Palestine, so-called 
		now as Israel), is a real affront to the most elementary considerations 
		of justice. It is also an indelible shame that should continue to haunt 
		the British justice system for a long time to come.
Far from 
		being motivated by any real violations of the law, the arrest seemed to 
		have been prompted by a vindictive complaint by pro-Israeli Zionist 
		circles in the British capital. Ultimately, the real motive behind the 
		arrest is to silence one of the most outspoken defendants of Palestinian 
		rights, the very man the Israeli intelligence has been persecuting, 
		vilifying and even trying to assassinate.
I am not talking about 
		someone I don't know. Since the late 1980s, I have met Ra-ed Salah many 
		times. I visited him at his home in Um al-Fa'hm and I attended his 
		lectures. And from my acquaintance with the man, I can solemnly attest 
		to his honesty, religiosity, rectitude and clean credentials. He is a 
		man who would rather be morally straight than politically correct, he 
		wouldn't flinch from telling the truth (as he sees it) for fear of 
		undesirable public reaction. 
Shaikh Ra-ed Salah is therefore a 
		man of sublime principles. He feels he is morally obliged to speak up 
		against oppression, especially Israel's pornographic oppression that is 
		meted out to his own people on both sides of the Green Line, in the West 
		Bank and Gaza Strip as well as Israel.
He does belong to that 
		special category of people, which encompasses great men and women, who 
		stand up in the face of power, throwing their moral weight on the side 
		of the weak, the persecuted and the helpless. 
Hence, ascribing 
		racism to this man is an insult to truth, which can only be made by 
		irredeemable ignoramuses or malicious liars.
Needless to say, the 
		Israeli intelligence made every conceivable effort to vilify and 
		incriminate, even criminalize, Shaikh Salah. 
In October 2000, 
		Shin Beth agents tried to insert a few grams of hashish into his pocket 
		in the hope of besmirching his image among the Arab citizens in Israel. 
		A few years later, he was accused of encouraging terror and endangering 
		the security of Israel. 
Interestingly, the "terror" charges came 
		from a state that continues to embody and practice terror, even 63 years 
		after its misbegotten birth which wouldn't have occurred had it been for 
		the mass terror, ethnic cleansing and expulsion of the bulk of the true 
		natives of the land of Palestine.
In the past decade, the Shin 
		Beth became exasperated with Salah's focal and effective activism which 
		centered around one main theme, saving Jerusalem 's Aqsa Mosque from 
		Israeli conspiracies and hostile designs.
All sorts of charges 
		were concocted against the man, ranging from contacts with a terrorist 
		organization to giving flours, food and clothing to the children of 
		"terrorists." Israel classifies all Palestinians into two categories: 
		"terrorists" who oppose the nefarious Israeli occupation, even through 
		peaceful means, who ought to be annihilated; and collaborators (or 
		quislings) who either say nothing and do nothing, or agree to become 
		informers on their own people.
Shaikh Salah and a few of his 
		colleagues in the Islamic movement in Israel had to spend long prison 
		terms on mainly frivolous charges that had very little substance. In any 
		other country with a credible justice system, the charges would have 
		been dismissed as fabricated and lacking in credibility. 
		However, we are talking about Israel, a country that calls itself the 
		only democracy in the Middle East while in reality it commits adultery 
		with the most elementary aspects of justice, such as the timeless 
		judicial principle that the accused is innocent until he or she is 
		proven guilty.
In Israel, especially when non-Jews, e.g. 
		Palestinians, are involved, the principle is brashly reversed and the 
		accused becomes guilty until proven innocent.
In recent years, 
		the administration of justice in Israel, a country that is based on 
		rampant injustice and oppression, has undergone a Kafkaesque 
		metamorphosis. A Palestinian, even a man or woman who has never hurled a 
		stone on or even toward an Israeli armored personnel carrier rampaging 
		through his town or village, is treated as guilty even if proven 
		innocent.
This is the reason why thousands of innocent 
		Palestinians, including political leaders, elected lawmakers, college 
		professors and professionals of all sorts, are languishing in Israeli 
		dungeons and concentration camps on no other accounts than their 
		thoughts, views and feelings.
To conclude this article, I want to 
		address the collective conscience of the British people: By what 
		standard of morality are people who never hurt anyone in their lives, 
		like Ra'ed Salah, are arrested and persecuted for their views, while 
		real war criminals like Ehud Barak, Moshe Ya'alon and Ariel Sharon, who 
		bear on their hands so much innocent blood, are accorded stately 
		treatment at the hands of the British authorities? 
Britain which 
		seized Palestine from the Islamic Ottoman state and gave it Zionist Jews 
		on a silver platter is historically responsible from the enduring 
		Palestinian plight. However, far from seeking atonement for its 
		unforgivable sins, which wreaked disaster, death and pain on millions, 
		Britain seems to be still faithful to the same evil mentality that 
		motivated Lord Balfour 94 years ago to issue his infamous promise to 
		give Palestine to Zionist Jews.
      
      
      Fair Use
      Notice
      This site contains copyrighted material the
      use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright
      owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance
      understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
      democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this
      constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for
      in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
      Section 107, the material on this site is
      distributed without profit to those
      who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information
      for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
      If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of
      your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
      copyright owner.