www.ccun.org
www.aljazeerah.info
Al-Jazeerah History
Archives
Mission & Name
Conflict Terminology
Editorials
Gaza Holocaust
Gulf War
Isdood
Islam
News
News Photos
Opinion
Editorials
US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)
|
|
Editorial Note: The
following news reports are summaries from original sources. They may
also include corrections of Arabic names and political terminology.
Comments are in parentheses. |
More Israeli Defiance:
Enlarging Western Wall Jewish
Prayer Plaza in Palestinian Jerusalem
Israel plans expansion to Western Wall plaza
Published Thursday 25/03/2010 (updated) 27/03/2010 13:41
By Jonathan Cook
Jerusalem - The Israeli government has
indicated that it will press ahead with a plan to enlarge the Jewish
prayer plaza at the Western Wall in Jerusalem's Old City, despite
warnings that the move risks triggering a third intifada.
Israeli
officials rejected a Jerusalem court's proposal to shelve the plan
earlier in the week after the judge accepted that the plaza's expansion
would violate the "status quo" arrangement covering the Old City's holy
places. Islamic authorities agreed to the arrangement after Israel
occupied East Jerusalem in 1967.
The proposed area for an
expanded compound is in the area of the Mughrabi Gate, and one of the
entrances to the Haram Ash-Sharif, or noble sanctuary, which houses the
Al-Asqa Mosque.
Waves of Israeli encroachments on the site
starting in August at the start of Ramadan and surging in February and
March led to protests and violence targeting Palestinians. A heavily
armed visit to the compound by Ariel Sharon in 2000, shortly before he
became prime minister, to declare Israeli rights there sparked the
Second Intifada.
In recent weeks, analysts have grown
increasingly concerned that a third intifada is imminent as Benjamin
Netanyahu's government advanced settlement building projects in East
Jerusalem and declared several places deep in the occupied West Bank
Israeli heritage sites.
Another assault on Muslim control so
close to the Al-Aqsa Mosque would risk "pouring fuel on the fire" said
Hanna Sweid, a Palestinian member of the Israeli parliament who filed
the original planning objections to the Israeli scheme.
According
to evidence presented to the Jerusalem court, Israeli officials used
minor storm damage to a stone ramp leading to the Mughrabi Gate as a
pretext to tear it down six years ago. The intention was to replace the
ramp with a permanent metal bridge and then extend the Jewish prayer
plaza into the area where the ramp was positioned.
The scheme is
the brainchild of Shmuel Rabinowitz, the rabbi in charge of the Western
Wall, who declared the damage to the ramp in 2004 a "miracle" that
offered Israel the chance to take control of more land from Islamic
authorities in the Old City.
The rabbi's plan was approved in
late 2007 by a special ministerial committee headed by Ehud Olmert, then
the prime minister. The project also won the backing of Netanyahu
although he froze construction work in July under orders from the
Jerusalem court.
In January, Israeli justice Moussia Arad
proposed that the ramp be reinstated, or at the very least that the
bridge follow the exact route of the ramp, and that all prayer at the
site be banned. That position won the backing of United Nations
officials monitoring Israel's work at the Mughrabi Gate.
Since
the work on the gate began, Jordanian, Turkish, and Palestinian Islamic
authorities have all expressed deep concern as the work was increasingly
seen as a prelude to further expansion.
Observers had hoped
that, faced with the danger of another row with the United States so
soon after the diplomatic crisis sparked by Israeli settlement building
in East Jerusalem, Netanyahu might agree to the court's compromise.
They have been proved wrong.
"Netanyahu has a history of
trampling on Palestinian rights in the Old City," Sweid said. "There is
every reason to be worried about what he plans to get up to this time."
In 1996, during his previous stint as prime minister, Netanyahu
opened the Western Wall tunnel, another excavation site close to the
mosque compound, resulting in clashes that killed 75 Palestinians and 15
Israeli soldiers.
Israel says the Al-Aqsa Mosque and Dome of the
Rock sit on the ruins of two ancient Jewish temples, built by Solomon
and Herod. People of the Jewish faith thus refer to the site as Temple
Mount and in recent negotiations, some even attempted to stake out a
degree of Jewish sovereignty of the area.
Last week, in a sign of
the explosive consequences of tampering with the status quo concerning
Jerusalem's holy places, clashes broke out in a "day of rage" in East
Jerusalem following Israel's announcement that it had rebuilt an old
synagogue, the Hurva, close to the mosques.
"The Haram Ash-Sharif
is a site of unrivaled Muslim sensitivity and the Israeli government is
playing with fire here," said Mohammed Masalha, a lecturer who heads a
coalition of Islamic groups inside Israel that brought the court case.
In evidence presented to the court, Meir Ben Dov, an Israeli
archaeologist and the excavations director at the Western Wall for
nearly four decades, produced photographic evidence showing that the
storm had caused only a minor landslide.
"I was asked by the
government to inspect the damage two days after it occurred and I found
maybe a dozen stones had been dislodged," he said. "The ramp could have
been repaired in less than a week but instead they decided to demolish
it."
Judge Arad, Ben Dov said, had been "shocked" when she saw
the photographs.
Ben Dov said his recommendation that the walkway
be repaired for 14,000 US dollars was ignored by Israeli officials,
including the then-tourism minister, Benny Elon, a settler rabbi who
heads a far-right party. Instead, the government tore down the ramp and
built a temporary wooden bridge to the Mughrabi Gate while excavations
were carried out in the area exposed by the ramp's destruction.
The Jerusalem comptroller, Shulamit Rubin, the city's watchdog official,
criticized the excavations at the time, saying they were illegal because
the necessary authorizations had not been sought.
The secretive
nature of the excavations was widely assumed by Islamic groups to be
evidence of an Israeli intention to search for parts of the destroyed
temples. With such evidence, Israel would have a stronger claim to
extend its control.
The unscientific approach to the excavations
was highlighted in early 2007 when it emerged that three years earlier,
Israeli archaeologists had unearthed a Muslim prayer room from the time
of the Saladin, dating to the 11th century, but had kept the discovery
quiet.
In February 2007, when Israel brought heavy machinery to
the Mughrabi Gate excavations, hundreds of Palestinians clashed with
police while the Islamic Movement within Israel staged large
demonstrations. Islamic Jihad said it had fired two Qassam rockets from
Gaza in response, and Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigade threatened to carry out
attacks if the work was not halted.
Islamic authorities also
expressed fears that the compound of mosques might be damaged by the
bulldozers, and that the heavy machinery might also destroy the
as-yet-undiscovered Al-Buraq mosque, believed to be located close to the
Mughrabi Gate and marking the site where the Prophet Mohammed tethered
his horse on his Night Journey between Mecca and Jerusalem.
To
calm the situation, Israel allowed Turkish experts to examine the
excavations a short time later. They reported that Israel was trying to
sideline Jerusalem's Islamic history so that its Jewish aspects could be
emphasized.
Israel had another reason for pushing ahead with the
illegal excavations, said Kais Nasser, the lawyer representing the
Islamic groups. "They needed to unearth something, anything, that could
be claimed as an antiquity to nullify Muslim demands for the ramp to be
reinstated. Rebuilding the ramp would then be impossible because it
would risk damaging an archaeological site."
Nasser said Israel
hopes that if it can present the bridge as the only feasible option,
then there will be no obstacles to expanding the prayer plaza.
Ben Dov said he shared such suspicions about Israel's activities at the
site, adding that the goal of Israeli officials seemed to be to gain
control over the whole 480-meter length of the Western Wall.
He
and other observers have said it was just another example of a
long-standing policy to gradually encroach on Muslim control of the
mosque compound.
Among the most significant was the creation of
the City of David, an Israeli archaeological park, directly south of the
Al-Aqsa Mosque in the Palestinian neighborhood of Silwan. Run by the
extremist settler group Elad, the site has taken over neighboring
Palestinian homes and, along with the Jerusalem municipality and
government officials, has pushed for dozens more homes to be demolished.
The group eventually wants to link up the park with the Temple Mount.
Jewish settlers have also been concentrating their efforts on taking
over Palestinian homes in the Muslim quarter, close to the Haram
Ash-Sharif, and have been supported by right-wing politicians, including
in the past by Netanyahu.
One settler organization, Ateret
Cohanim, has been especially active, and is known to be excavating under
Palestinian homes around the compound in the hope of discovering traces
of the temples.
"What we see here is an unholy alliance of
government ministers, Jerusalem municipality officials, and settler
organizations trying to revive a supposed golden era of Jewish
sovereignty from thousands of years ago," Sweid said.
In
addition, he added, Israel believes that a more significant Israeli
presence close to the mosques would strengthen its hand in any final
peace talks over the division of Jerusalem with the Palestinians, with
Israel able to stake a bigger claim to sovereignty over the site.
At the Camp David talks in 2000, then US President Bill Clinton
proposed dividing sovereignty so that Israel would have control over
both the "subterranean spaces" of the mosque compound and the Western
Wall. During the talks, then Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak alarmed
observers by calling the whole compound the Jewish "holy of holies," a
term previously used in referring only to the inner sanctum of the
destroyed temples.
There are additional fears among Palestinians,
and the wider Muslim world, of darker plots being hatched by even more
extreme groups.
Although Jewish religious purity laws have
traditionally forbidden Jews from entering the Temple Mount, a growing
number of rabbis are demanding that Jews be allowed to pray in the
compound. Even more fanatical groups are known to favor blowing up the
mosques and building a third temple in their place.
The recent
rebuilding of the Hurva synagogue has added to such concerns. The
Israeli media reported that, according to a 300-year-old rabbinical
prophecy, the synagogue's rebuilding would herald the construction of
the third temple.
A sordid affair: The Mughrabi quarter's ethnic
cleansing
Israel's ethnic cleansing of the Mughrabi, or
Moroccan, quarter of Jerusalem's Old City after its capture in 1967 was
one of the more sordid episodes of the 1967 war.
Until it was
destroyed by Israel in 2004, the stone ramp that led to the Mughrabi
Gate -- one of the main entrances to the elevated compound of mosques
known as the Haram Ash-Sharif -- was the only visible reminder that the
quarter, once home to 1,000 Palestinians, had ever existed.
At
the end of the Six-Day war in June 1967, as Israeli troops poured into
the Old City, the Israeli government was presented with an opportunity
not only to restore a Jewish presence to the walled city but to create a
newly expanded Jewish quarter that would have the Western Wall at its
center.
Before 1948, prayer at the wall had been possible only at
several points along a narrow alley at the margins of the densely
populated Moroccan quarter, an area bequeathed in the 12th century to
Saladin's followers by his son Malik Al-Afdal.
But in the
immediate wake of the "miraculous" victory in 1967, the Israeli
government saw the chance to create a wide prayer plaza in front of the
wall, making it the symbolic heart of an expanded Jewish state that
could unite religious and secular Jews.
All that stood in their
way were the quarter's 135 homes.
On the night of 10 June, Uzi
Narkiss, head of the army's central command, authorized 15 private
demolition crews to raze the quarter under cover of dark. He, like the
politicians, knew that neither the international community nor the
Israeli courts would consent to such a brazen violation of international
law.
When Teddy Kollek, the mayor of West Jerusalem, consulted
the justice minister, he had been told: "I don't know what the legal
status is. Do it quickly and may the God of Israel be with you."
Uzi Benziman, an Israeli journalist, described the "near-mystic"
compulsion that drove those behind the act of ethnic cleansing: "The
officers and the contractors considered themselves emissaries, come to
renew Jewish statehood as it had been 1,897 years earlier."
An
officer went from house to house ordering the residents to evacuate.
According to observers, those who refused finally fled when the walls of
their homes came down. One old woman, found amid the rubble, died a
short time later.
As the ruins were cleared and the ground
leveled to create an expansive plaza in front of the Western Wall, the
contractors were told to use the rubble from the homes to build a ramp
up to the Mughrabi Gate. The gate is the only entrance to the compound
for which Israel has kept the key. The ramp was designated the only
access point for all non-Muslim visitors, including the Israeli police,
to the Haram Ash-Sharif.
The Western Wall and the plaza, on land
that had previously fallen under the control of the Islamic authorities,
was placed under the jurisdiction of the Israeli Religious Affairs
Ministry. A few days later, on the Jewish holy day of Shavuot, an
estimated 200,000 Israeli Jews -- one in 10 of the population -- came to
visit the wall.
Although Israel effectively annexed East
Jerusalem, its leaders were still troubled by the possible international
repercussions of being seen to seize control of the Old City's holy
places, especially the compound of mosques. Under a so-called "status
quo" agreement, Muslim officials were supposed to continue controlling
the mosque compound, with Israeli oversight.
But that did not
stop the rapid emergence of a movement in Israel seeking control of the
compound too. Many Jews believe the ruins of the temples of Solomon and
Herod can be found under the mosques.
From the early 1970s,
extremist rabbis -- led by the Shlomo Goren, then the chief rabbi of
Israel -- began lobbying for Jews to be allowed into the compound to
pray, despite traditional rabbinical rulings against such a practice.
Jewish groups soon sprang up demanding more: that the mosques be
blown up to make way for a third temple that would bring nearer the
arrival of the Messiah.
Since the outbreak of the Second
Intifada, little of the status quo agreement remains. Israeli movement
restrictions affecting both Gaza and the West Bank mean that today only
a tiny number of Palestinians can reach the mosques. Palestinian
institutions are also barred from operating inside Jerusalem.
Meanwhile, settlers and Israeli officials have encroached on more and
more land around the mosque compound. At the Camp David talks with the
Palestinians in 2000, Israel proposed for the first time that Jews be
allowed to pray in the compound and that Israel have a degree of
sovereignty over the site.
In recent years Israeli Jews have
started to be escorted by Israeli police inside the compound through the
Mughrabi Gate, although praying so far has not been sanctioned.
The author is a writer and journalist based in Nazareth, Israel. A
version of this article originally appeared in The National, published
in Abu Dhabi. It is republished here with permission from the author.
Fair Use
Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the
use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this
constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for
in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
Section 107, the material on this site is
distributed without profit to those
who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information
for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of
your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
copyright owner.
|
|
|