Is the Israeli Occupation Government
Going to Admit the Murder of Rachel Corrie?
A Rachel Corrie delegation, headed by her parents Cindy
and Craig, attends Ramadan events in the southern
Gaza city of Rafah on 18 September 2009. [MaanImages/Hatem
Omar]
|
Corrie witness: Army tried to alter my statement
Published yesterday (updated) 16/03/2010 20:17
Bethlehem - Ma'an -
The Haifa District Court on Monday saw the third day of testimony in
the civil lawsuit filed by Rachel Corrie’s parents against the Israeli
occupation government for the unlawful killing of their daughter in
Rafah, Gaza.
Rachel was crushed to death, on March 16, 2003, by
a Caterpillar D9R bulldozer. She had been demonstrating against
Palestinian home demolitions with fellow members of the International
Solidarity Movement (ISM), a Palestinian-led movement committed to
resisting the Israeli occupation of Palestinian land using nonviolent,
direct-action methods and principles.
Monday's only testimony
came from British citizen Alice Coy, a nurse, who was an eyewitness to
the killing. The Israeli occupation government spent most of the day
trying to establish that contrary to all eyewitness accounts and human
rights reports, the Israeli occupation forces had no intention of
demolishing homes in the area on the day Rachel was killed, the Rachel
Corrie Foundation said in a statement.
Coy testified that when
the Israeli military interviewed her on 1 April about Rachel’s killing,
the soldier who documented her testimony refused to record her statement
that she believed the bulldozers were going to destroy civilian homes.
She believed the Israeli occupation forces was planning to demolish
homes on the day Rachel was killed because they had been demolishing
homes on the Philadelphi Corridor in the days and weeks prior, and
because they had already begun to demolish a house earlier that day by
damaging its porch, Coy said, according to the Rachel Corrie Foundation
statement.
Coy had spoken with many Palestinian families in the
area where Rachel was killed whose homes had been demolished by the
Israeli occupation forces , and told the court that she believed the
bulldozer driver who killed Rachel could see her. She described her view
of her work with ISM as promoting peace for the whole region, the
statement said.
Seven years after Rachel's death, her parents,
Craig and Cindy Corrie arrived in Israel's Haifa District Court on
Wednesday. The court has heard witness testimony in the opening days of
the civil trial seeking compensation.
In the first day of the
trial, the court heard testimony from Richard Purssell, a British
activist with the International Solidarity Movement who described how an
Israeli Caterpillar D9 armored bulldozer drove over approximately four
meters over Corrie, before reversing back over her. Another British ISM
member, Tom Dale, also testified.
Three officials from the US
Embassy in Tel Aviv attended the hearing, among them the Consul General
Andrew Parker. The Corries also said they met with aides to US Vice
President Joe Biden. US officials have pledged to attend every court
session, Craig Corrie told Ma'an.
On Thursday, the Israeli
occupation government Prosecutor’s Office issued a statement laying out
its case. It claimed "The driver of the bulldozer and his commander had
a very limited field of vision, such that they had no possibility of
seeing Ms. Corrie."
The Israeli occupation government also
argued that Corrie's death was caused by "a military action in the
course of war," for which the Israeli occupation government
therefore bears no responsibility !!!
Fair Use
Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the
use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this
constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for
in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
Section 107, the material on this site is
distributed without profit to those
who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information
for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of
your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
copyright owner.