Al-Jazeerah: Cross-Cultural Understanding
News, June 2010 |
||||||||||||||||||||
www.aljazeerah.info Archives Mission & Name Conflict Terminology Editorials Gaza Holocaust Gulf War Isdood Islam News News Photos Opinion Editorials US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)
|
Announcements About $ Trillions of Afghanistan Minerals an Attempt Stop Obama's Withdrawal Plan in 2011 Editor's Note: The following article of Forbes magazine by Gordon Chang demonstrates that the announcement about trillions of dollars of Afghanistan minerals is an attempt to oppose President Obama's plan to withdraw from Afghanistan starting from 2011. Basically, Chang claims that China will be the winner as it will control these minerals when the Taliban Movement controls the country after the US withdrawal. If this happens, China will control the US imports of these minerals, which will place the US under the Chinese mercy. The timing of the announcement should give support to skepticism about the hidden agenda behind it, particularly because the experts have always known that there are minerals in Afghanistan. Actually, the Bush/Cheney administration negotiated with the Taliban government about the oil pipeline well before the September 11 attacks, which were used as a pretext to invade and occupy Afghanistan. US Defense Department Report: http://www.defense.gov/news/d2010614slides.pdf Chang's main argument: "As the New York Times reports, the Chinese want to buy up even more of Afghanistan's resources. They will surely succeed in exploiting most of the trillion dollars of minerals if the Taliban fighters take back control of the country, as they will if President Obama adheres to his plan to begin withdrawing troops next July. The Taliban, in short, could become a minerals superpower in a few years time." ============================== The Taliban: World's Next Minerals Superpower Forbes, Gordon G. Chang, 06.16.10, 12:38 PM EDT Afghanistan's resources raise the stakes in Central Asia. This week the U.S. Defense Department revealed that Afghanistan possesses at least $908.9 billion in untapped mineral resources. Iron accounts for $420.9 billion of the total, and copper $274.0 billion. There is cobalt, gold and molybdenum. The country could become, according to a Pentagon memo, the “Saudi Arabia of lithium.” Just as interesting, there is niobium, used to make superconducting steel. Most significantly, Afghanistan has substantial deposits of rare earth minerals, estimated to be worth $7.4 billion. And why is this so important? At present, China has a near monopoly over them. It possesses about 36% of world reserves, by far the biggest share for any nation, and accounts for around 97% of global production. Five years ago Beijing substantially tightened export controls on these minerals. At this moment, officials are building a strategic reserve of them. Last August China's Ministry of Industry and Information Technology announced it would prohibit exports of some heavy rare earth minerals and restrict exports of other rare earths to levels far below current global needs. The complete prohibition may go into effect by 2015. Beijing, unfortunately, is not content to control just its own rare earth resources. The Chinese are buying deposits around the world, including those in the U.S. and Canada. And that brings us back to Afghanistan. Beijing, not surprisingly, has already shown great interest in the resources of its troubled neighbor to the west. In 2007 a Chinese company won the concession to the Aynak copper mine in Afghanistan's Logar province--after paying, according to American officials, a bribe of $30 million to the now-former minister of mines. As the New York Times reports, the Chinese want to buy up even more of Afghanistan's resources. They will surely succeed in exploiting most of the trillion dollars of minerals if the Taliban fighters take back control of the country, as they will if President Obama adheres to his plan to begin withdrawing troops next July. The Taliban, in short, could become a minerals superpower in a few years time. That will surely mean an even larger portion of the world's rare earth deposits will be under Chinese control. Beijing has traditionally maintained strong ties to the Taliban, continuing relations even after Sept. 11. Since that horrible event, for instance, China went through with the sale of a telephone system for Kabul and, after the group's ouster, has supplied it with weapons used against NATO forces. The Pentagon, in September, is scheduled to complete its report identifying “national security risks due to rare earth material dependencies.” Yet we don't have to wait until then to know what it will say. The U.S. is not mining any rare earth minerals at the moment, and there is only one American company with commercially significant deposits of heavy rare earths. It is not entirely clear what defense planners will do when China's export ban on these minerals goes into effect. Rare earth minerals are used in every major weapons system the U.S. fields today, from M1A2 Abrams tanks to Arleigh Burke-class destroyers. There is not a plane in the American inventory that will fly tomorrow without some mineral that is now mined in China. Lasers, radar and missile-guidance systems? Yes, they all require rare earth minerals, as do the military's hard drives. So the stakes just went up in Afghanistan with the release of the information this week. The U.S. has a critical reliance on what is in the ground in that war-torn land. Kabul can undercut Beijing's virtual monopoly on rare earths--or it can help the Chinese tighten their grip over global markets. Gordon G. Chang is the author of The Coming Collapse of China. He writes a weekly column for Forbes. ====================== Many news stories about wealth of Afghanistan before President Bush decided to invade the country: New Book Details Bush/Big Oil Negotiations With Taliban BEFORE WTC Fact: The WTC was bombed right AFTER Bush-Taliban oil pipeline talks soured. The talks soured right AFTER Bush/Big Oil threatened Taliban to take their offer or ... www.rense.com/general17/before.htm · Cached page Bush Administration to Talk With Taliban? - ABC News As the Bush administration reviews its strategy in Afghanistan, there is an emerging consensus that the way forward should include reaching out to supporters of the Taliban, and ... abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=6132704 Bush presses Gen on Taliban, fixes 3-way talks with Karzai Latest news, breaking news - Bush presses Gen on Taliban, fixes 3-way talks with Karzai www.indianexpress.com/news/bush-presses-gen-on-taliban-fixes-3way-talks-with-karzai/13265 · Cached page Bush gave the Taliban $43 million in May 2001 !! | Drudge Retort Not that we should forget the Bush Administration were warned about Bin Laden and yet chose to reward his hosts, The Taliban. Their level of incompetence and double talk is more ... www.drudge.com/archive/110014/bush-gave-taliban-43-million-may · Cached page Talk:Taliban - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Island Breath: Bush-Taliban Deal Disaster The talks soured right after the Americans threatened the Taliban to take their offer or else. Bush-Cheneyl and Afghanistan's Taliban ... homepage.mac.com/juanwilson/islandbreath/2004Year/04-military/military10bushtalibandeal.html · Cached page Bush / Patraeus: Talk to the Taliban? | The Ruth Group McCain and Palin will soon be spinning in their electoral grave.... The U.S. is actively considering talks with elements of the Taliban, the armed www.ruthgroup.org/2008/10/28/bush-patraeus-talk-to-the-taliban · Cached page ======================== Rense.com New Book Details Bush/Big Oil Negotiations With Taliban
BUSH-TALIBAN DEAL SOURCE: JUAN WILSON juanwilson@mac.com Could We Have Avoided 9/11? Hell yes! 9 April 2004 8:30pm Members of the Taliban in Afganistan before the fall The turmoil and attention surrounding the 9/11 Hearings have centered on whether the Bush Administration had enough information to have averted the attack on the World Trade Center and Pentagon. I am not one who believes that had we only had the forsight to limit our civil libereties before September 11, 2001 we could have escaped the tragedy of that day. The problem was not that the FBI and CIA were not sharing intelligence. The problem was the lousy oil pipeline deal that Bush was trying to get for US oil companies. The deal was so important to Bush that intelligence agencies were told to go easy on the Taliban and their links to Al Queda. In the beginning of August, the Bush administration delivered what amounted to an ultimatum to the Taliban. The Taliban representatives were reportedly told: accept our offer and receive "a carpet of gold or you'll would get a carpet of bombs." That's a quote, according to French authors Jean-Charles Brisard and Guillaume Dasquie, who wrote book about this extraordinary business deal titled "Bin Laden: The Forbidden Truth" The book claims that Bush ordered the FBI and other U.S. law enforcement groups to back off on terrorist related investigations while the oil pipeline negotiations were underway! Some have said FBI's Deputy Director John O'Neill resigned in July of 2001 in protest over this obstruction. After watching the recent 9/11 Commission Hearings I remembered stories that floated through the media for months after the World Trade Center and Pentagon were attacked. Those stories have evaporated from TV but they are on the interent. After a bit of browsing some details were refreshed in my mind. Taleban in Texas for talks on gas pipeline December 4, 1997 from the BBC [Editor's note: George Bush was Governor of Texas in 1997] A senior delegation from the Taleban movement in Afghanistan is in the United States for talks with an international energy company that wants to construct a gas pipeline from Turkmenistan across Afghanistan to Pakistan. The 1,300km pipeline will carry gas across Afghanistan's harsh terrain. A spokesman for the company, Unocal, said the Taleban were expected to spend several days at the company's headquarters in Sugarland, Texas. Spelling It Out November 19, 2001 from TOP_VIEW1@go.com Fact: The WTC was bombed right after Bush-Taliban oil pipeline talks soured. The talks soured right after the Americans threatened the Taliban to take their offer or else. Bush-Cheneyl and Afghanistan's Taliban negotiated for months over running a Caspian Sea oil pipeline through Afghanistan. Talks began in February and continued right on until only one month before New York City's World Trade Center towers were demolished. During the course of these negotiations, the two parties were unable to agree upon a deal, Mainly because American oil agents constantly upped the ante on the rather naive Taliban representatives: playing intimidation, bait & switch, and "shell" games relentlessly. Bush administration negotiations with the Taliban December 30, 2002 from Tuthout.org American petroleum giant Unocal very much wanted this project for years, but it was stymied in 1998 after bin Laden blew up two American embassies in Africa, causing the Taliban to be diplomatically isolated. There are a number of reports that describe a reinvigoration of this pipeline plan after Bush took office, and further describe the Bush administration's negotiations with the Taliban including threats of war if the project was not allowed to pass through Afghanistan. Some say these threats, in the name of the pipeline, triggered the 9/11 attacks. The Taliban is gone, Afghan President Harmid Karzai is a former Unocal consultant, and the pipeline deal is finally done. Agreement On US 3.2 Billion Gas Pipeline Project Signed December 28, 2002 from PakNews.com Pakistan, Afghanistan and Turkmenistan on Friday signed here a framework agreement for a US $ 3.2 billion gas pipeline project passing through the three countries. The ceremony was held at the Presidential Palace with the three leaders, Prime Minister Mir Zafarullah Khan Jamali, President Saparmurat Niyazov of Turkmenistan and Afghan President Hamid Karzai signing the document. Are these things not pertinent to the 9/11 Commission? Is the truth so ugly we can't look at it? Could it be that George Bush was trying to expand his families franchise with intolerant middle eastern governments to enrich that dynasty and the whole thing blew up in his face? Could he be that bad a businessman? Well to that last question I'd say yes. Fair Use Notice This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
|
|
Opinions expressed in various sections are the sole responsibility of their authors and they may not represent Al-Jazeerah & ccun.org. editor@aljazeerah.info & editor@ccun.org |