www.ccun.org
www.aljazeerah.info
Al-Jazeerah History
Archives
Mission & Name
Conflict Terminology
Editorials
Gaza Holocaust
Gulf War
Isdood
Islam
News
News Photos
Opinion
Editorials
US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)
|
|
Editorial Note: The
following news reports are summaries from original sources. They may
also include corrections of Arabic names and political terminology.
Comments are in parentheses. |
Second Anniversary of Israeli War on Gaza:
Part 10 of the Findings of South African Jurist
Richard Goldstone's Report
UN
Fact Finding Mission on the Gaza Conflict.
'When I left the house there were 22 people dead'
Published today (updated) 05/01/2010 15:44
Bethlehem - Ma'an -
According to Israel, its army's rules of engagement for the Gaza
assault emphasized distinction as one of four "guiding principles that
applied in an integrated and cumulative manner: military necessity,
distinction, proportionality and humanity."
It defines the
principle of distinction in the following terms: "Strikes shall be
directed against military objectives and combatants only. It is
absolutely prohibited to intentionally strike civilians or civilian
objects (in contrast to incidental proportional harm)."
Richard
Goldstone's
UN
fact-finding mission investigated 11 incidents in which serious
allegations of direct attacks with lethal outcome were made against
civilians.
"In these incidents, 34 Palestinian civilians lost
their lives owing to Israeli fire intentionally directed at them.
Numerous others were injured, some very severely and with permanent
consequences," his report states. "There appears to have been no
justifiable military objective pursued in any of them."
The first
two incidents concern alleged attacks by Israeli forces against houses
in the As-Samouni neighborhood of Gaza during the initial phase of the
ground invasion.
Attacks on the houses of Ateya and
Wa'el Samouni
Attacks on the houses of Ateya and Wa'el
Samouni killed 23 members of his extended family. The Goldstone mission
visited the site of these incidents and interviewed five members of the
family and several of their neighbors. Two relatives, who were
eyewitnesses to the bloodshed, Wa'el and Salah Samouni, testified at a
public hearing in Gaza on 28 June 2009.
"I lost my mother. I
lost my son. I lost my daughter. I lost my sister-in-law, my nephews, my
cousins. I lost so many people," Wa'el told the commission. "I'm not
talking about one or two. Twenty-nine members of my family were killed.
It was an appalling massacre. No one had expected that thing to
happen."
The As-Samouni area is part of Zeytoun, south of Gaza
City. It is inhabited by members of the As-Samouni family, which gives
its name to the area, as well as by others. The area is more rural than
urban; houses used to stand next to small olive and fig groves, chicken
coops and other small plots of agricultural land. A small mosque stood
in the center of the neighborhood. These no longer existed at the time
of the team's visit in June 2009. In fact, the mission reported seeing
very few buildings left and a few tents standing amidst the rubble of
collapsed houses and bulldozed land.
"The Samouni land that was
destroyed was about 80 dunums, which is about 80 acres, which were
destroyed and that land was our source of living," Wa'el explained. "The
land was completely turned over, has nothing left of it. The only thing
you can see is just earth."
The Israeli ground offensive from
the east reached the neighborhood around 4am on 4 January 2009. In
addition to these forces, there were, in all likelihood, heliborne
troops that landed on the roofs of several houses, the mission notes.
Residents told investigators that there was shooting during the night of
3 to 4 January and again the following night, but denied having seen any
Palestinian fighters.
Wa'el recounted: "When I ran outside the
house I heard shootings. I saw my cousin Salah. He was [carrying] his
six-month[-old] baby. He said that it was probably the resistance that
targeted my house. I didn't know. So he said to me, 'Bring your ID and
come with me.' So I went with my cousin. I carried my [other] cousin,
who was six months old. I took my cousin inside the house. So [Salah]
said, "Well, those who were shooting were Israelis.' So I went back to
my mother, I said goodbye to her, and I said, 'I may not come back
again.'"
According to Salah: "I left my house on the 5th; some
people were calling me out of my house. I thought they were the
resistance people but they were the IDF [Israel Defense Forces]
people."
The killing of Ateya Samouni and his son Ahmad
During the morning of 4 January 2009, Israeli soldiers entered many
houses in the area. One of the first, around 5am, was the house of Ateya
Samouni, 45. Faraj, his 22-year-old son, had already met soldiers some
minutes earlier as he stepped outside to warn neighbors that their roof
was on fire. Soldiers entered Ateya's house by force, throwing an
explosive device, possibly a grenade. In the midst of the smoke, fire
and loud noise, Ateya stepped forward, his arms raised, and declared
that he was the owner of the house. The soldiers shot him while he was
still holding his ID and an Israeli driving license in his hands.
Soldiers then opened gunfire inside the room in which approximately
20 relatives were gathered. Several were injured, Ahmad, a boy of four,
particularly seriously. Soldiers with night-vision equipment entered and
closely inspected each of those present. They then moved to the next
room and set fire to it. The smoke soon started to suffocate the family.
A witness speaking to the Goldstone team recalled seeing "white stuff"
coming out of the mouth of his 17-month-old nephew and helping him to
breathe.
At about 6:30am, the soldiers ordered the family to
leave. They had to leave Ateya's body behind but were carrying Ahmad,
who was still breathing. The family tried to enter the house of an uncle
next door, but were not allowed to do so by the soldiers. The soldiers
told them to take the road and leave, but a few meters further different
soldiers stopped them and ordered the men to undress completely. Faraj,
who was carrying the severely injured Ahmad, pleaded with them to be
allowed to evacuate the injured. The soldiers allegedly replied using
abusive language. They also said: "You are bad Arabs." "You go to
Nitzarim."
Nitzarim is an evacuated Israeli settlement in
northern Gaza.
Faraj, his mother and others entered the house of
an uncle. From there, they called the Palestinian Red Crescent Society
(PRCS). At around 4pm that day an ambulance managed to come in the
vicinity of the house where Ahmad was lying wounded, but was prevented
by Israeli forces from rescuing him. Ahmad died at around 2am during the
night of 4 to 5 January.
Faraj told the UN team that, at the
time of Ahmad's death, another relative gave birth to a baby in the same
house. She was in a wheelchair, having earlier broker her leg doing
household chores.
The following morning those present in the
house, about 45 persons, decided to leave. They made themselves white
flags and walked in the direction of Salah Ad-Din Street. A group of
soldiers told them to go back, but witnesses said that they walked on in
the direction of Gaza. The soldiers shot at their feet, without injuring
anyone. Two kilometers further north on Salah Ad-Din, they found
ambulances which took the injured, including the mother and her new-born
child, to the Ash-Shifa Hospital in Gaza City.
The attack
on the house of Wa'el Samouni
In other cases, the entry
of soldiers was less violent than in Ateya's home. In one instance,
soldiers landed on the roof and descended the stairs to the ground
floor, separated men from women, searched and handcuffed the men. In
another case they broke into a house by knocking a hole in the wall with
a sledgehammer.
At Salah's house, Israeli soldiers knocked on
the door and ordered those inside to open it. All the persons inside the
house stepped out one by one and Salah's father identified each of the
family members in Hebrew. According to Salah, they asked to be allowed
to go to Gaza City, but the soldiers refused and instead ordered them to
go to Wa'el's house across the street.
The Israeli soldiers also
ordered those in other houses to move to Wa'el's house. As a result,
around 100 members of his extended family, the majority women and
children, were assembled in that house by noon on 4 January.
"Concerning the incident itself, we were gathered generally in my
house," Wa'el recalled. "I was there with my children, my wife,
altogether we were 12 persons. My relatives were gathered in my house at
about 5:00 in the morning."
There was hardly any water and no
milk for the small children. Around 5pm, one of the women went outside
to gather firewood. There was some flour in the house and she made
bread, one piece for each.
The family was still in the home with
little food the next morning. "So my mother said, 'How about if we
prepare some breakfast for the children? At least they will not die
hungry.' So I, my cousin, a number of my cousins, we went to find some
firewood [for a second time] to prepare the breakfast," Wa'el said. Wa'el,
Salah, Hamdi, Muhammad, and Iyad, stepped outside the house to collect
firewood sometime between 6:30 and 7am. Rashad remained standing next to
the door. Later, Salah would point out to the UN mission that from where
the Israeli soldiers were positioned on the roofs of the houses they
could see the men clearly.
Suddenly, a projectile struck next to
the five men, close to the door of Wa'el's house, killing Muhammad and,
most likely, Hamdi.
According to Salah: "... we were trying to
collect some sticks for feeding the fire to bake loaves, and then we
exchanged greetings with some of our neighbors and before we did
anything, we saw missiles falling down in that space of two meters where
we were collecting sticks."
Wa'el described the same series of
events: "As we were leaving the house, we were targeted by an Apache
missile. Two of my cousins died immediately. I was wounded. I was
brought into the house. Someone was trying to [care for] my wounds but
the house was targeted by another Apache missile right inside the house.
Ten persons were killed immediately," Wa'el recalled.
The other
men managed to retreat to the house. Within about five minutes, two or
three more projectiles struck the house directly. Salah and Wa'el
testified that the missiles were launched from Apache helicopters.
Goldstone's investigation was not able to determine the type of munition
used.
"So we didn't understand why we were targeted. We tried to
talk to the Israelis. We told them, 'You gathered us all inside that
house, all the children, women, and elderly. Why did you target us?' The
Apache targeted us again with another missile. Fifteen other people were
killed. We couldn't do anything. We were helpless. All the survivors
were shouting and screaming..."
According to Salah, 21 family
members were killed and 19 injured in the attack on Wa'el's house. After
the shelling, most of those inside decided to leave immediately and walk
to Gaza City, leaving behind the dead and some of the wounded.
As
they began to walk, women waved their scarves to indicate they were
unarmed civilians. Soldiers, however, ordered them to return to the
house. When family members replied that there were many injured among
them, the soldiers' reaction was, according to Salah, "go back to
death." They decided not to follow this injunction and walked in the
direction of Gaza City.
"Everybody was saying, 'Let's leave the
house. It's better to die outside than inside.' We couldn't do anything.
We were helpless," Wa'el said. "I was the last to leave the house. I had
in my arms a five-year-old baby. His elbow was crushed and I was barely
able to stand on my feet. But with God's help I was able to stand up
again. I ran across to my mother-in-law. She was wounded. I told her,
'Listen, I mean if you still have some time to live, God will give you
the force to stand up again and leave.'
"So I walked for about
three meters. I was carrying my kid. I ran across another child who was
dead. There was a hole in his leg; his left leg was torn to pieces. So I
dropped my five-year-old kid and tried to carry the other child who was
lying on the floor. But he was dying. Then he became pale. So I
considered that he died and I said goodbye to him. I left the house.
When I left the house there were 22 people dead."
According to
Salah: "We left the house at our own insistence, but the rest of us were
afraid that we would be killed outside. I said to be killed outside the
house is much better and we took the Salah Ad-Din Road toward the
hospital, but the IDF were overlooking everything."
Once there,
they went to the Palestinian Red Crescent Socuety and told them about
the injured who were left behind.
The attempts of PRCS and ICRC
to rescue the civilians
PRCS made its first attempt to evacuate
the injured on 4 January 2009 after receiving a call from Ateya's family.
PRCS called the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC),
asking it to coordinate its entry into the area with Israeli forces. A
PRCS ambulance from Al-Quds Hospital managed to reach the area. At one
of the first houses in the area, Israeli soldiers on the ground and on
the roof of one of the houses directed their guns at it and ordered it
to stop. The driver and the nurse were ordered to get out of the
vehicle, raise their hands, take off their clothes and lie on the
ground. Israeli soldiers then searched them and the vehicle for between
5 and 10 minutes. Having found nothing, the soldiers ordered the
ambulance team to return to Gaza City, in spite of their pleas to be
allowed to pick up some wounded.
In his statement to the
Goldstone mission, the ambulance driver recalled seeing women and
children huddling under the staircase in a house, but not being allowed
to take them with him.
As soon as the first evacuees from the
Samouni family arrived in Gaza City on 5 January, PRCS and ICRC
requested permission from the Israeli armed forces to go into the
neighborhood to evacuate the wounded. The requests were denied.
On 6 January around 6:45pm, one ICRC car and four PRCS ambulances drove
toward the area without coordination with Israeli forces, they were once
again not allowed to enter the area and evacuate the wounded.
"Everywhere we were requesting, we were calling for rest, we were
calling for help, and everybody said, including those of the Red
Crescent and the Red Cross, 'We are not able to come to [you].' They
were not able to come to our rescue," Salah said.
On 7 January
2009, Israeli forces finally authorized ICRC and PRCS to go to the As-Samouni
area during the "temporary ceasefire" declared from 1 to 4pm on that
day. Three ambulances, an ICRC car and another car used to transport
bodies drove down from Gaza City until, 1.5 km north of the area, they
found it closed by sand mounds. ICRC tried to coordinate with Israeli
forces to have the road opened, but they refused and asked the ambulance
staff to walk the remaining 1.5 km.
Once in the neighborhood,
PRCS looked for survivors in the houses. An ambulance driver who was
part of the team told the Goldstone mission that in Wa'el's house they
found 15 dead bodies and two seriously injured children. One had a deep
wound in the shoulder, which was infected and giving off a foul odor.
The children were dehydrated and scared of the medic. In a house close
by, they found 11 persons in one room, including a dead woman.
The rescue teams had only three hours for the entire operation and the
evacuees were physically weak and emotionally very unstable. The road
had been damaged by the impact of shells and the movement of Israeli
forces, including tanks and bulldozers. The rescuers put all the elderly
on a cart and pulled it themselves for 1.5 kilometers to the place where
they had been forced to leave the ambulances. The bodies lying in the
street or under the rubble, among them women and children, as well as
the dead they had found in the houses had to be left behind.
On
the way back, PRCS staff entered one house where they found a man with
two broken legs. While they were carrying him out, Israeli forces
started firing at the house, likely to warn that the three-hour
"temporary ceasefire" was about to expire. PRCS was not able to return
to the area until 18 January.
On 18 January 2009, members of the
Samouni family were finally able to return to their neighborhood. They
found Wa'el's house, as most other houses in the neighborhood and the
small mosque, demolished. Israeli forces had destroyed the building on
top of the bodies of those who died in the attack. Pictures taken on 18
January show feet and legs sticking out from under the rubble and sand,
and rescuers pulling out the bodies of women, men and children. A
witness described to the UN team family members taking away the corpses
on horse carts, a young man sitting in shock beside the ruins of his
house and, above all, the extremely strong smell of death.
"I
found Azza, my daughter," Salah said. "The age is two and a half years,
only. I carried her. I found her already dead and when we took her after
13 days, the bodies had started to [de]compose ... I searched for my
mother. When I got to her, [I] saw her head outside [of the rubble], I
found that half of her head was gone. When I looked at my father, I
found him still breathing his last and to my wife, she had shrapnel in
her head. Other wives of my cousins, the guts of my cousins and nephews,
[were] out. ..."
Factual findings
With
regard to the context in which the attacks on the houses took place,
Goldstone notes that there is some indication that there might have been
a presence of combatants in the neighborhood during the first hours of
the ground attack. The mission considered, however, that the testimonies
of the witnesses strongly suggested that already before daybreak on 4
January 2009 Israeli forces were in full control.
According to
several witnesses, soldiers on the street spoke to residents who had
ventured outside. In some cases, they entered houses non-violently after
knocking. According to Salah, the prolonged identification of all the
persons present in his house (his father identifying each family member
in Hebrew) took place outside. Soldiers appear to have been confident
that they were not at immediate risk.
The UN report said that
considering the generally calm circumstances that appear to have
prevailed in the neighborhood at the time, and the fact that the
soldiers had already spoken to Faraj, one of the persons in Ateya's
house, the mission could not see any circumstance justifying the violent
entry into the house.
With regard to the attack on the five men
who stepped out of Wa'el's house to fetch firewood and to the subsequent
shelling of the house, the mission notes that the members of other
families who had been moved by Israeli forces into Wa'el's house had
been searched, as recounted by Saleh.
"Everything indicates that
the Israeli forces knew that there were about 100 civilians in the
house. Indeed, the families had asked to be allowed to leave the area
towards a safer place, but had been ordered to stay in Wa’el al-Samouni’s
house. The house must have been under constant observation by the
Israeli soldiers, who had complete control over the area at the time."
Wa'el addressed the UN mission: "The entire Samouni family was
destroyed. Their land was churned. We have no trees left. What we are
asking for is one thing, one question. Please answer this question. Why
did the Israelis do this to us? They killed our children, our women, and
once you have lost your loved ones, what can you do in life. Why did you
do this? Why did the Israelis do this?"
Four days after the
massacre, Israeli forces denied that the attack on Wa'el's house even
took place. On 9 January 2009, an Israeli army spokesman, Jacob Dallal,
told Reuters that “the IDF did not mass people into any specific
building. […] Furthermore, we checked with regard to IDF fire on the
5th. The IDF did not target any building in or near Zeitun [sic] on the
5th."
According to the Goldstone report, published some nine
months later, the mission was not aware of any subsequent statement from
Israel which would contradict this blanket denial or suggest that the
allegations have been the subject of further investigation. Last month,
however, Israel's army informed Ma'an that it was investigating the
allegations.
With regard to the obstruction of emergency medical
access to the wounded, the report notes that four-year-old Ahmad was
still alive at 4pm on 4 January 2009, when the ambulance called by his
relatives managed to arrive within 100 to 200 meters from the house
where he was. He died about 10 hours later, which suggests that he might
have had a good chance of survival. Soldiers stopped the ambulance and
thoroughly searched the driver, nurse and vehicle. Although they did not
find anything indicating that the medics were not on a genuine emergency
mission to evacuate a wounded civilian, they forced the ambulance to
return to Gaza City without the injured toddler.
The information
before it "leads the Mission to believe that the Israeli armed forces
arbitrarily prevented the evacuation of the wounded from the al-Samouni
area, thereby causing at least one additional death, worsening of the
injuries in others, and severe psychological trauma in at least some of
the victims, particularly children."
These findings are
corroborated by a statement ICRC issued on 8 January 2008: "The ICRC had
requested safe passage for ambulances to access this neighborhood since
3 January but it only received permission to do so from the Israel
Defense Forces during the afternoon of 7 January.
"The ICRC/PRCS
team found four small children next to their dead mothers in one of the
houses. They were too weak to stand up on their own. One man was also
found alive, too weak to stand up. In all there were at least 12 corpses
lying on mattresses. In another house, the ICRC/PRCS rescue team found
15 other survivors of this attack including several wounded. In yet
another house, they found an additional three corpses. Israeli soldiers
posted at a military position some 80 meters away from this house
ordered the rescue team to leave the area which they refused to do.
There were several other positions of the Israel Defense Forces nearby
as well as two tanks."
Legal findings
"The fundamental principles applicable to these incidents, which are
cornerstones of both treaty-based and customary international
humanitarian law, are that 'the parties to the conflict shall at all
times distinguish between the civilian population and combatants' and
that 'the civilian population as such, as well as individual civilians,
shall not be the object of attack,'" the Goldstone report states.
In every case mentioned here, Israeli forces carried out direct
intentional strikes against civilians, it adds. "[I]n none of the cases
reviewed were there any grounds which could have reasonably induced the
Israeli armed forces to assume that the civilians attacked were in fact
taking a direct part in the hostilities and had thus lost their immunity
against direct attacks."
Goldstone's team therefore determined
that Israel "would be responsible under international law for these
internationally wrongful actions carried out by its agents."
The
UN mission found that the conduct of Israeli forces in these cases would
constitute "grave breaches of the Fourth Geneva Convention in respect of
willful killings and willfully causing great suffering to protected
persons and as such give rise to individual criminal responsibility."
Fair Use
Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the
use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this
constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for
in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
Section 107, the material on this site is
distributed without profit to those
who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information
for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of
your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
copyright owner.
|
|
|