NATO Chief, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, Seeks Broader Ties with China & India, Displacing the UN & Making it Obsolete

NATO Chief Seeks Broader Ties with China, India

AFP, Sunday, February 7 01:17 pm

Lorne Cook

Drawing from flaws exposed in Afghanistan, where NATO is struggling to hold off the Taliban (resistance), Anders Fogh Rasmussen said the military alliance should become a forum for consultation on major hot spots.

"This is a key lesson we are learning in Afghanistan today ... we need an entirely new compact between all the actors on the security stage," he said at a major security conference in Munich, southern Germany.

"India has a stake in Afghan stability. China too. And both could help further develop and rebuild Afghanistan. The same goes for Russia. Basically, Russia shares our security concerns," he said.

NATO and its partners have more than 110,000 troops in Afghanistan, but they have been unable to put down the insurgency more than eight years after a US-led coalition ousted the Taliban from power.

Under a recent switch of strategy, almost 40,000 extra troops are streaming into the conflict-torn country, aiming to protect civilians and win their support, rather than hunt down fighters, many re-supplied from Pakistan.

Following last month's conference in London, the strategy also involves a "surge" of civilian experts, backed by redoubled efforts from major donors, financial institutions and bodies like the United Nations and European Union.

"We cannot meet today's security requirements effectively without engaging much more actively and systematically with other important players on the international scene," Rasmussen said.

"The alliance should become the hub of a network of security partnerships and a centre for consultation on international security issues -- even issues on which the alliance might never take action," he went on.

"What would be the harm if countries such as China, India, Pakistan and others were to develop closer ties with NATO? I think, in fact, there would only be a benefit, in terms of trust, confidence and cooperation."

Rasmussen underlined that he did not seek to replace the work of the United Nations (Yeah right !), and his stance was backed by German Defence Minister Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg.

"We don't want to enter into any competition with the United Nations," the minister said. "We don't want to turn NATO into a global (imperialist) security agency." (That's exactly what NATO is right now).

The alliance's top military officer, US Admiral James Stavridis added: "NATO is not a global actor, but an actor in a global world. There's a huge difference."

Rasmussen said he envisaged a forum in which NATO and its partners world-wide could air views and concerns, and exchange best practice.

"And where, if it makes sense -- if we decide that NATO should have a role -- we might work out how to tackle global challenges together."

NATO has 28 member nations, but its partnership involves 44 countries in Afghanistan, as well as ties with other regional forums, such as the group of Mediterranean nations.

But Rasmussen said militaries did not train, plan or organise together, while non-governmental groups avoided armies out of concern it might harm their image, but that changing practices would require a "cultural revolution".

"NATO is much more than just 28 allies," said Canadian Foreign Minister Peter MacKay. "Partnerships are integral to NATO's ability to meet security challenges at a distance."

Fair Use Notice

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.