Netanyahu Rejects 1967 Borders as Basis for
Israeli-Palestinian Talks, US to Consult with Quartet Over Abbas Request
Netanyahu rejects '67 borders as basis for talks
Published today (updated) 12/08/2010 11:14
JERUSALEM (Ma'an) --
Israeli occupation government prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu,
reiterated his request that direct peace talks with Palestinians go
ahead without preconditions, during a meeting with US envoy to the peace
process George Mitchell on Wednesday.
President Mahmoud Abbas,
following his Tuesday meeting with Mitchell, told the press that he
emphasized the need to base talks on a March statement by the Middle
East Quartet, which outlined its position that a future Palestinian
state should be based on the 1967 borders.
Israel daily
newspaper Haaretz reported Thursday that when presented with the
Palestinian conditions for talks - namely a clear framework supported
directly by representatives from the United States - the US envoy did
not dismiss the proposal.
The Quartet statement called for 24
months of talks with the goal of establishing a Palestinian state, and
said the baseline of the talks must be a Palestinian state on the
pre-1967 borders.
Haaretz quoted "Senior officials in Jerusalem
who are involved in the efforts to renew direct peace talks," saying the
conditions were not acceptable to the Israeli prime minister, who said
the preconditions were not something the public would accept.
During his meeting with Netanyahu, Mitchell reportedly told him that
Washington has not yet taken a position on the proposal yet, but told
the Israeli leader that Abbas would be ready to enter talks directly if
the formula was accepted.
Abbas flew to Cairo on Thursday morning
for a tripartite meeting with Egyptian and Jordanian leaders, where he
is expected to brief officials on the latest in the peace process.
Speaking with reporters on Tuesday, Abbas laid out his three
requests for peace talk parameters:
First, a tripartite meeting
between Israeli, Palestinian and American negotiators, where sides would
jointly develop a map for the direct talks, based on a principal of a
two-state solution and the boundaries as they were on 4 June 1967.
Second, Abbas said, he requested that the United States lay the
groundwork for talks, and for the objectives that those talks hoped to
achieve.
The final condition Abbas said he put before Mitchell,
was based on a March decision by the international Middle East Quartet,
and later backed by the EU, calling for negotiations on the basis of an
end to occupation and respect for international laws and UN decisions.
During the news conference, Abbas was insistent that the conditions
he set forward were just and based on a genuine Palestinian will to
enter peace talks, but demanding assurances that Israel was also an
honest participant.
"We are rational and believe in our rights
and the search for peace for our people," he said.
US to consult with Quartet over Abbas request
Published today (updated) 12/08/2010 11:21
WASHINGTON (Ma'an) --
US State Department officials said Wednesday, peace efforts would
"press forward in the coming days" despite the latest visit by Middle
East envoy George Mitchell characterized as a failure by many media
outlets.
Mitchell, who left the region on Wednesday evening, met
with Israeli and Palestinian leaders during his latest tour, and
presented a formula for talks laid out by President Mahmoud Abbas to
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, which the latter rejected.
Abbas, who requested that talks proceed from a statement issued
in March by the Middle East Quartet - made up of representatives from
the US, EU, UN and Russia - also asked that the United States be present
as the schedule for talks was laid out.
State Department
Spokesman James Patrick Crowley said no decision had been made in
Washington regarding the proposal, but said officials would "continue
our consultations with the Quartet members and other parties in the
region."
Crowley stressed the fact that neither party had
rejected the idea of direct talks, and were rather working through the
details of what direct talks would look like. "I would not characterize
... our situation as deadlocked," the spokesman said, noting both sides
"indicate that they are ready to proceed into direct negotiations."
The official said Washington believes "we are closer to direct
negotiations than we were last week," but did not indicate if or how
American eagerness for talks to move forward would translate into
practice.
"We will continue to consult with the Quartet and
others on how we can be as supportive as possible and to encourage the
leaders to say yes and move forward," Crowley said.
Speaking
with reporters on Tuesday, Abbas said he laid out three conditions to
Mitchell to convey to Israeli negotiators. First that US officials sit
in on a joint meeting with negotiators to develop a map for the direct
talks, based on a principal of a two-state solution and the boundaries
as they were on 4 June 1967.
Second, Abbas said, he requested
that the United States lay the groundwork for talks, and for the
objectives that those talks hoped to achieve.
The final condition
Abbas said he put before Mitchell, was based on a March decision by the
international Middle East Quartet, and later backed by the EU, calling
for negotiations on the basis of an end to occupation and respect for
international laws and UN decisions.
Quartet statement expected
Crowley said that following Abbas' request that the March
Quartet statement, later backed by the EU, be used as a baseline for
talks, that a new statement on the issue would be released by the
Quartet in the coming days.
"We will work through the elements of
that statement with our partners and use whatever means that we can to
demonstrate that we are supportive of the leaders as they contemplate
taking this important step into direct negotiations," Crowley said.
The official noted that details on location and even who would
participate in talks if they were held was still up for negotiation. "If
we can resolve those" issues, Crowley said, "we think will overcome
remaining hesitation."