In Israel, There Are No Israelis, Only Jews,
Arabs, and Others, Says the Racist, Apartheid, Zionist State !
Palestinian minority denied Israeli nationality
Published yesterday (updated) 07/04/2010 13:03
By Jonathan Cook
Nazareth -
A group of Jews and Palestinians are fighting in the Israeli courts
to be recognised as "Israelis," a nationality currently denied them, in
a case that officials fear may threaten the country's self-declared
status as a Jewish state.
Israel refused to recognise an Israeli
nationality at the country's establishment in 1948, making an unusual
distinction between citizenship and nationality. Although all Israelis
qualify as "citizens of Israel," the state is defined as belonging to
the "Jewish nation," meaning not only the 5.6 million Israeli Jews but
also more than seven million Jews in the diaspora.
Critics say
the special status of Jewish nationality has been a way to undermine the
citizenship rights of non-Jews in Israel, especially the fifth of the
population who are Palestinian. Some 30 laws in Israel specifically
privilege Jews, including in the areas of immigration rights,
naturalisation, access to land and employment.
Palestinian
leaders have also long complained that indications of "Arab" nationality
on ID cards make it easy for police and government officials to target
such citizens for harsher treatment.
The Interior Ministry has
adopted more than 130 possible nationalities for Israeli citizens, most
of them defined in religious or ethnic terms, with "Jewish" and "Arab"
being the main categories.
The group's legal case is being heard
by the supreme court after a district judge rejected their petition two
years ago, backing the state's position that there is no Israeli nation.
The head of the campaign for Israeli nationality, Uzi Ornan, a
retired linguistics professor, said "it is absurd that Israel, which
recognises dozens of different nationalities, refuses to recognise the
one nationality it is supposed to represent."
The government
opposes the case, claiming that the campaign's real goal is to
"undermine the state's infrastructure" -- a presumed reference to laws
and official institutions that ensure Jewish citizens enjoy a privileged
status in Israel.
Ornan, 86, said that denying a common Israeli
nationality was the linchpin of state-sanctioned discrimination against
the Palestinian population.
"There are even two laws -- the Law
of Return for Jews and the Citizenship Law for Arabs -- that determine
how you belong to the state," he said. "What kind of democracy divides
its citizens into two kinds?"
Yoel Harshefi, a lawyer supporting
Ornan, said the Interior Ministry had resorted to creating national
groups with no legal recognition outside Israel, such as "Arab" or
"unknown," to avoid recognising an Israeli nationality.
In
official documents most Israelis are classified as "Jewish" or "Arab,"
but immigrants whose status as Jews is questioned by the Israeli
rabbinate, including more than 300,000 arrivals from the former Soviet
Union, are typically registered according to their country of origin.
"Imagine the uproar in Jewish communities in the United States,
Britain or France, if the authorities there tried to classify their
citizens as 'Jewish' or 'Christian'," said Ornan.
The professor,
who lives close to Haifa, launched his legal action after the Interior
Ministry refused to change his nationality to "Israeli" in 2000. An
online petition declaring "I am an Israeli" has attracted several
thousand signatures.
Ornan has been joined in his action by 20
other public figures, including former government minister Shulamit
Aloni. Several members have been registered with unusual nationalities
such as "Russian," "Buddhist?," "Georgian," and "Burmese."
Two
Palestinians are party to the case, including Adel Kadaan, who courted
controversy in the 1990s by waging a lengthy legal action to be allowed
to live in one of several hundred communities in Israel open only to
Jews.
Uri Avnery, a peace activist and former member of the
parliament, said the current nationality system gave Jews living abroad
a far greater stake in Israel than its 1.3 million Palestinian citizens.
"The State of Israel cannot recognise an 'Israeli' nation because it
is the state of the 'Jewish' nation. It belongs to the Jews of Brooklyn,
Budapest and Buenos Aires, even though these consider themselves as
belonging to the American, Hungarian or Argentine nations."
International Zionist organisations representing the diaspora, such as
the Jewish National Fund and the Jewish Agency, are given in Israeli law
a special, quasi-governmental role, especially in relation to
immigration and control over large areas of Israeli territory for the
settlement of Jews only.
Ornan said the lack of a common
nationality violated Israel's Declaration of Independence, which says
the state will "uphold the full social and political equality of all its
citizens, without distinction of religion, race or sex."
Indications of nationality on ID cards carried by Israelis made it easy
for officials to discriminate against Palestinian citizens, he added.
The government has countered that the nationality section on ID
cards was phased out from 2000 -- after the Interior Ministry, which was
run by a religious party at the time, objected to a court order
requiring it to identify non-Orthodox Jews as "Jewish" on the cards.
However, Ornan said any official could instantly tell if he was
looking at the card of a Jew or Palestinian because the date of birth on
the IDs of Jews was given according to the Hebrew calendar. In addition,
the ID of a Palestinian, unlike a Jew, included the grandfather's name.
"Flash your ID card and whatever government clerk is sitting
across from you immediately knows which 'clan' you belong to, and can
refer you to those best suited to 'handle your kind'," Ornan said.
The distinction between Jewish and Arab nationalities is also shown
on Interior Ministry records used to make important decisions about
personal status issues such as marriage, divorce and death, which are
dealt with on entirely sectarian terms.
Only Israelis from the
same religious group, for example, are allowed to marry inside Israel --
otherwise they are forced to wed abroad and cemeteries are separated
according to religious belonging.
Some of those who have joined
the campaign complain that it has damaged their business interests. One
Druze member, Carmel Wahaba, said he had lost the chance to establish an
import-export company in France because officials there refused to
accept documents stating his nationality as "Druze" rather than
"Israeli."
The group also said it hoped to expose a verbal
sleight of hand that intentionally mistranslates the Hebrew term
"Israeli citizenship" on the country's passports as "Israeli
nationality" in English to avoid problems with foreign border officials.
B Michael, a commentator for Yedioth Aharonoth, Israel's most
popular newspaper, has observed: "We are all Israeli nationals -- but
only abroad."
The campaign, however, is likely to face an uphill
struggle in the courts.
A similar legal suit brought by a Tel
Aviv psychologist, George Tamrin, failed in 1970. Shimon Agranat, head
of the supreme court at the time, ruled: "There is no Israeli nation
separate from the Jewish people. The Jewish people is composed not only
of those residing in Israel but also of diaspora Jewries."
That
view was echoed by the district court in 2008 when it heard Ornan's
case.
The judges in the supreme court, which held the first
appeal hearing last month, indicated that they too were likely to be
unsympathetic. Justice Uzi Fogelman said "the question is whether or not
the court is the right place to solve this problem."
Johnathan Cook is a writer and journalist based in Nazareth, Israel.
A version of this article originally appeared in The National, published
in Abu Dhabi. It is republished here with permission from the author.
Fair Use
Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the
use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this
constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for
in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
Section 107, the material on this site is
distributed without profit to those
who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information
for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of
your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
copyright owner.