Al-Jazeerah: Cross-Cultural Understanding
News, May 2009 |
||||||||||||||||||||
www.aljazeerah.info Archives Mission & Name Conflict Terminology Editorials Gaza Holocaust Gulf War Isdood Islam News News Photos Opinion Editorials US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)
|
54 Taliban Soldiers, 9 Pakistani Soldiers Killed, Near Swat Valley Town of Mingora, 800,000 People Become Refugees
Pakistan: 63 dead as army nears Swat Valley town By Riaz Khan, Associated Press Writer – May 14, 2009 MARDAN, Pakistan – The Pakistani army says 54 Taliban fighters and nine troops have been killed in the northwestern Swat Valley and that government forces are fighting their way in on the ground. Army spokesman Maj. Gen. Athar Abbas said troops were engaged Thursday in intense fighting about four miles (six kilometers) south of Mingora, the valley's main town. The army launched an offensive in several areas of the northwest last month after Taliban fighters seized territory near the capital, Islamabad. MARDAN, Pakistan (AP) — The offensive against Taliban insurgents in the Swat Valley area has driven at least 800,000 people from their homes, with 80,000 staying in several camps south of the battle zone. Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani told Parliament on Thursday that it was the largest internal displacement of Pakistanis since the country's creation in 1947. "They are sacrificing for the future, and every Pakistani is ready to help them," he said of the refugees. The military say it has killed more than 750 militants in the operation, a toll the media have been unable to corroborate. The offensive is shaping up as a major test of the Pakistani army's often questioned commitment to uprooting the insurgency gnawing away at the stability of the nuclear-armed, pro-Western state, but the refugee exodus could undercut support for the fight. The U.S. and the U.N. say Jamaat-ud-Dawa is a front for Lashkar-e-Taiba, the militant group accused of planning and carrying out last year's attacks in the Indian financial capital of Mumbai, which left 166 people dead and hundreds more wounded. The government launched a crackdown on Jamaat soon after the attacks, arresting several of its leaders, seizing its assets and closing its branches. Jamaat denied having any links to Lashkar, which in turn denied involvement in the attacks. Government spokesmen were not immediately available for comment. Pakistan's crackdown on Jamaat was welcomed by India and the United States, but analysts at the time said it was likely the group would emerge under another name. "We are silently helping the homeless, hungry and needy people, and let us do our work without maligning us," said Mian Adil, deputy chairman of Falah and a former member of Jamaat. "We have sent 2,000 of our members to help our brothers and sisters." In the main town of Mardan, around 10 volunteers manned a distribution point for relief goods and services. A large white flag featuring a sword in black along with the Islamic confession of faith — Jamaat's logo — fluttered nearby, along with a sign saying "Stop slaughtering Muslims," a message presumably addressed to the military. The same logo was on the back of jackets worn by some of the volunteers. "We provide newly arrived refugees with food and medical treatment and juices to the kids," said Zargham Khan, 32. Jamaat spokesman Yahya Mujahid confirmed the group was present in the region, but declined to say explicitly whether Falah was a new name for Jamaat. "We know the Pakistan government banned us under a U.N. order, but we are helping out brothers and sisters in those areas," he said. Any move by the government to stop Falah would likely be unpopular, legally difficult and risk a backlash among Pakistanis. Jamaat, which helped tens of thousands of people following the deadly Kashmir earthquake in 2005 and a smaller quake in Baluchistan last year, used to get its money from donations. Lashkar is believed to have once enjoyed close links with Pakistan's intelligence agencies, which cultivated it as an ally in Kashmir, a disputed territory claimed by both India and Pakistan. In a statement Wednesday, the military said the offensive would only be successful if the refugees received aid and civilian casualties were kept to a minimum. It pledged to help feed 80,000 refugees each day. Also Thursday, China said it was donating $1 million to Pakistan to help civilians displaced by the recent fighting. The two countries are longtime allies. The army said commandos airlifted into the valley Tuesday had established a "firm hold" in the remote Piochar area, the rear base of Swat Taliban leader Maulana Fazlullah. Various clashes in the previous 24 hours left four soldiers and 11 militants dead, it said. The army has yet to start operations in Mingora, where witnesses say insurgents are in control and preparing for what could be bloody house-to-house fighting. The prime minister also condemned a recent Taliban threat to kidnap and harm lawmakers and their relatives if they did not oppose the military offensive. "We will give you full protection," Gilani assured legislators. ___ Associated Press writers Munir Ahmad in Islamabad and Christopher Bodeen in Beijing contributed to this report. Fair Use Notice This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
|
|
Opinions expressed in various sections are the sole responsibility of their authors and they may not represent ccun.org. editor@ccun.org |