Al-Jazeerah History
Archives
Mission & Name
Conflict Terminology
Editorials
Gaza Holocaust
Gulf War
Isdood
Islam
News
News Photos
Opinion
Editorials
US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)
www.aljazeerah.info
|
|
Editorial Note: The
following news reports are summaries from original sources. They may
also include corrections of Arabic names and political terminology.
Comments are in parentheses. |
HRW says Israel's use of white phosphorus evidence
of war crimes
Date: 25 / 03 / 2009 Time: 20:08 Bethlehem –
Ma’an –
Israel's repeated firing of white phosphorus shells over densely
populated areas of Gaza during its recent military campaign was
indiscriminate and is evidence of war crimes, Human Rights Watch said in
a report released on Wednesday.
Human Rights Watch is one of the
world’s leading independent organizations dedicated to defending and
protecting human rights.
The 71-page report, "Rain of Fire:
Israel's Unlawful Use of White Phosphorus in Gaza," provides witness
accounts of the devastating effects that white phosphorus munitions had
on civilians and civilian property in Gaza.
Human Rights Watch
researchers in Gaza immediately after hostilities ended found spent
shells, canister liners, and dozens of burnt felt wedges containing
white phosphorus on city streets, apartment roofs, residential
courtyards, and at a United Nations school. The report also presents
ballistics evidence, photographs, and satellite imagery, as well as
documents from the Israeli military and government.
Militaries
use white phosphorus primarily to obscure their operations on the ground
by creating thick smoke. It can also be used as an incendiary weapon.
"In Gaza, the Israeli military didn't just use white phosphorus
in open areas as a screen for its troops," said Fred Abrahams, senior
emergencies researcher at Human Rights Watch and co-author of the
report. "It fired white phosphorus repeatedly over densely populated
areas, even when its troops weren't in the area and safer smoke shells
were available. As a result, civilians needlessly suffered and died."
The report documents a pattern or policy of white phosphorus use
that Human Rights Watch says must have required the approval of senior
military officers.
"For the needless civilian deaths caused by
white phosphorus, senior commanders should be held to account," Abrahams
said.
On 1 February, Human Rights Watch submitted detailed
questions to the Israeli military about its white phosphorus use in
Gaza. It did not provide responses, citing an internal inquiry being
conducted by the country's Southern Command.
In the recent Gaza
operations, Israeli forces frequently air-burst white phosphorus in
155mm artillery shells in and near populated areas. Each air-burst shell
spreads 116 burning white phosphorus wedges in a radius extending up to
125 meters from the blast point. White phosphorus ignites and burns on
contact with oxygen, and continues burning at up to 816 degrees Celsius
(1,500 degrees Fahrenheit) until nothing is left or the oxygen supply is
cut. When white phosphorus comes into contact with skin it creates
intense and persistent burns.
When used properly in open areas,
white phosphorus munitions are not illegal, but the Human Rights Watch
report concludes that the Israeli military repeatedly exploded it
unlawfully over populated neighborhoods, killing and wounding civilians
and damaging civilian structures, including a school, a market, a
humanitarian aid warehouse, and a hospital.
Israel at first
denied it was using white phosphorus in Gaza but, facing mounting
evidence to the contrary, said that it was using all weapons in
compliance with international law. Later it announced an internal
investigation into possible improper white phosphorus use.
In a
statement sent to Ma'an, a spokesperson for the Israeli military vowed
to investigate, but said that "it is already possible to conclude that
the IDF's use of smoke shells was in accordance with international law."
"These shells were used for specific operational needs only and in
accord with international humanitarian law. The claim that smoke shells
were used indiscriminately, or to threaten the civilian population, is
baseless," a military spokesperson said.
Regardless, the
country's military has vowed a thorough and impartial investigation, but
Abrahams said that past investigations into allegations of wrongdoing
"suggest that this inquiry will be neither thorough nor impartial."
"That's why an international investigation is required into serious laws
of war violations by all parties," he said.
The Israeli military
knew that white phosphorus poses life-threatening dangers to civilians,
Human Rights Watch said. A medical report prepared during the recent
hostilities by the Israeli Health Ministry said that white phosphorus
"can cause serious injury and death when it comes into contact with the
skin, is inhaled or is swallowed." Burns on less than 10 percent of the
body can be fatal because of damage to the liver, kidneys, and heart,
the ministry report says. Infection is common and the body's absorption
of the chemical can cause serious damage to internal organs, as well as
death.
If the Israeli military intended to use white phosphorus
as a smokescreen for its forces, it had a readily available non-lethal
alternative to white phosphorus - smoke shells produced by an Israeli
company, Human Rights Watch concluded.
All of the white
phosphorus shells that Human Rights Watch found were manufactured in the
United States in 1989 by Thiokol Aerospace, which was running the
Louisiana Army Ammunition Plant at the time. On 4 January, Reuters
photographed Israeli military artillery units handling projectiles whose
markings indicate that they were produced in the United States at the
Pine Bluff Arsenal in September 1991.
To explain the high number
of civilian casualties in Gaza, Israeli officials have repeatedly blamed
Hamas for using civilians as "human shields" and for fighting from
civilian sites. In the cases documented in the report, Human Rights
Watch found no evidence of Hamas using human shields in the vicinity at
the time of the attacks. In some areas Palestinian fighters appear to
have been present, but this does not justify the indiscriminate use of
white phosphorus in a populated area, the group insisted.
Human
Rights Watch said that for multiple reasons it concluded that the
Israeli military had deliberately or recklessly used white phosphorus
munitions in violation of the laws of war. First, the repeated use of
air-burst white phosphorus in populated areas until the last days of the
operation reveals a pattern or policy of conduct rather than incidental
or accidental usage.
Second, Human Rights Watch said the Israeli
military was well aware of the effects of white phosphorus and the
dangers it poses to civilians. Third, the Israeli military failed to use
safer available alternatives for smokescreens, according to the human
rights organization.
The laws of war obligate states to
investigate impartially allegations of war crimes. The evidence
available demands that Israel investigate and prosecute as appropriate
those who ordered or carried out unlawful attacks using white phosphorus
munitions, Human Rights Watch said.
The United States
government, which supplied Israel with its white phosphorus munitions,
should also conduct an investigation to determine whether Israel used it
in violation of the laws of war, the group added.
Fair Use
Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the
use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this
constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for
in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
Section 107, the material on this site is
distributed without profit to those
who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information
for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of
your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
copyright owner.
|
|
|