Al-Jazeerah History
Archives
Mission & Name
Conflict Terminology
Editorials
Gaza Holocaust
Gulf War
Isdood
Islam
News
News Photos
Opinion
Editorials
US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)
www.aljazeerah.info
|
|
Editorial Note: The
following news reports are summaries from original sources. They may
also include corrections of Arabic names and political terminology.
Comments are in parentheses. |
Judge Allows Sami Al-Arian's Defense to File Motion to Dismiss Charges
World View News Service March 12, 2009 Judge says Justice
Department's Integrity at Stake
Judge Leonie Brinkema ruled in
favor of a defense request to file a motion to dismiss the charges
against Dr. Sami Al-Arian at a hearing in federal court today. Her
decision follows new revelations that prosecutors in Florida were
opposed to efforts by a Virginia prosecutor to call Dr. Al-Arian to
testify in another case. The judge's important decision raises the
possibility that Dr. Al-Arian's ordeal could be resolved and that he
can finally regain his freedom after six years of grueling legal
battles.
During the hearing earlier today, Assistant U.S.
Attorney Gordon Kromberg argued for the fourth time that the entire
issue of the 2006 plea agreement is irrelevant to the criminal
contempt charges. The judge has repeatedly rejected that argument,
reaffirming on Monday that the "record is incomplete" and that the
government's response poses more questions than answers. Judge
Brinkema stated that there was "enough smoke" in the facts of the
case that needed to be cleared up. By the end of the hearing, the
judge said she was granting the defense's request to file for a
complete dismissal of the charges because "the integrity of the
Justice Department cannot be compromised."
The judge began the
hearing by asking Kromberg how he became aware of the plea agreement
on March 1, 2006, despite the fact that it was filed under seal in
Florida the previous day, and was only known to the parties involved.
Evading the question, the prosecutor simply stated that he was able
to call Dr. Al-Arian to testify once the Florida judge imposed the
maximum sentence, a move that extended his imprisonment by eleven
months.. Judge Brinkema agreed with lead defense counsel Jonathan
Turley that the plea agreement could not be breached by the government
simply because Dr. Al-Arian received a longer sentence. Judge
Brinkema also pointed out that, contrary to the prosecution's
assertions, the issue of the plea agreement has never been resolved
since no other court has ever granted a hearing to examine all the
evidence. After Kromberg concluded his statement to the court, Professor
Turley noted that new facts had come to light in the government's recent
court motion that had not been previously disclosed. Specifically, none
of the courts that have addressed the issue of the plea agreement were
made aware of an internal split within the Department of Justice on
whether Dr. Al-Arian should be called to testify in Virginia. It has
since come to light that prosecutors in Florida objected to efforts by
Kromberg to compel Dr. Al-Arian's testimony. Professor Turley concluded
by saying that now was the time for the court to consider these new
facts and allow the defense to argue for the dismissal of the charges.
In granting the motion, the judge expressed her disappointment with
the prosecutors' persistent refusal to present clear statements about
their conduct during the plea negotiations. She said that there are
serious questions about whether the government conducted bad faith
dealings with the defense that could now result in Dr. Al-Arian's
imprisonment. Before someone could be forced to give up their
individual liberty, she said, these issues should be resolved. She
suggested that although prosecutors had not offered their own
affidavits on the plea negotiations, she was "reading between the
lines" that there was "a meeting of the minds" that the intent of the
plea agreement was to conclude Dr. Al-Arian's business with the U.S.
government once and for all.
Although Judge Brinkema was
originally expected to set a new trial date during today's hearing,
she instead gave the defense ten days to submit a motion to dismiss
the charges. Prosecutors will then have ten days to respond.
An estimated twenty-five people, some hailing from as far as Tampa,
Florida, attended the hearing today to express their support for Dr.
Al-Arian.. The Tampa Bay Coalition for Justice and Peace would like to
extend its appreciation to those individuals who have consistently stood
up for justice in Dr. Al-Arian's case, led by Dr. Al-Arian's legal
counsel, Professor Turley from George Washington University and William
Olson and P.J. Meitl from the law firm of Bryan Cave.
Fair Use
Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the
use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this
constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for
in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
Section 107, the material on this site is
distributed without profit to those
who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information
for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of
your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
copyright owner.
|
|
|