Al-Jazeerah History
Archives
Mission & Name
Conflict Terminology
Editorials
Gaza Holocaust
Gulf War
Isdood
Islam
News
News Photos
Opinion
Editorials
US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)
www.aljazeerah.info
|
|
Editorial Note: The
following news reports are summaries from original sources. They may also
include corrections of Arabic names and political terminology.
Comments are in parentheses. |
British Commander in Afghanistan, Mark Carleton-Smith, Says
War on Taliban Cannot be Won, Gates Calls it Defeat
ccun.org, October 8, 2008
Editor's Note:
Apparently, General Patraeus's plan in Iraq, called surge, is being
implemented in Afghanistan. As it has been realized and acknowledged
that the Iraq and Afghan wars cannot be won militarily, the Patraeus
plan focuses on reconciliation with the resistance fighters.
In Iraq, a big proportion of resistance fighters stopped fighting US
forces and were absorbed in the US-backed Iraqi government forces under
the name of Sahwa. Basically, they were bought with money to leave the
resistance and join the government forces.
The talks between Taliban and the US-backed government in Afghanistan
seem to be heading in the same direction, as Taliban leaders have been
confirming that they are no longer allies to Al-Qaeda. This opens the
door for Taliban fighters to join the Afghani government forces, and
probably fighting Al-Qaeda, as their Sahwa Iraqi counterparts.
If you can't beat them, join them, or let them join you.
==========================
U.S. says Afghan war comments "defeatist"
7. October 2008, 13:25
By Jonathon Burch and Kristin Roberts, Reuters
Britain's military commander and ambassador in Afghanistan are being
"defeatist" by thinking the war cannot be won, U.S. Defense Secretary
Robert Gates said, as
Washington seeks more troops for the conflict that started exactly seven
years ago.
The comments by the officials from Britain, a key ally to the United
States in Afghanistan and Iraq, were echoed by the top United Nations
official in Kabul, who said success was only possible through dialogue
and other political efforts.
After the invasion of Afghanistan on October 7, 2001 to oust the
fundamentalist Taliban government in the wake of the September 11
attacks on the United States, security has deteriorated markedly over
the past two years.
"While we face significant challenges in Afghanistan, there certainly is
no reason to be defeatist or to underestimate the opportunities to be
successful in the long run," Gates said on Monday on his way to Europe
to meet defense ministers.
Washington is reviewing its Afghan strategy in a similar way to the 2006
reappraisal of its Iraq policy that led to a "surge" of 30,000 troops
and helped pull the country back from the brink of civil war.
Gates said part of the solution in Afghanistan would be negotiating with
members of the Taliban willing to work with the government in Kabul. He
compared that to reconciliation efforts in Iraq, where tribal leaders
have switched sides to fight the insurgency and al Qaeda.
"What we have seen in Iraq applies in Afghanistan," Gates said of the
possibility of peace talks with the Taliban.
"Part of the solution is strengthening the Afghan security forces. Part
of the solution is reconciliation with people who are willing to work
with the Afghan government."
Talk of negotiating with the Taliban also featured in the comments by
the British commander and the U.N. official.
"What we need most of all is a political surge, more political energy,"
Kai Eide, the U.N. special envoy to Afghanistan, told a news conference
on Monday. "We all know that we cannot win it militarily. It has to be
won through political means. That means political engagement."
MORE TROOPS
The Taliban have repeatedly rejected the
idea of talks unless all 70,000 foreign troops leave the country.
"As we said before, as long as the invader forces are in Afghanistan, we
won't participate in any negotiations," Taliban spokesman Qari Mohammad
Yousuf told the Pakistan-based Afghan news agency, AIP.
He also denied reports that negotiations had taken place between the
Taliban and the Afghan government in Saudi Arabia.
The British commander, Brig. Mark Carleton-Smith, told the Sunday Times
the war against the Taliban could not be won and that the goal was to
shrink the insurgency so it was no longer a strategic threat and could
be dealt with by the Afghan army.
If the Taliban were willing to talk, he said, that might be "precisely
the sort of progress" needed to end the insurgency.
Britain's ambassador to Kabul, Sherard Cowper-Coles, saw an "acceptable
dictator" as the best solution, with a troop surge only creating more
targets for the Taliban, according to parts of a diplomatic cable
published in a French newspaper.
In another sign of shifting opinion, Germany said it will no longer
provide troops from its KSK special forces to support U.S.-led
counterterrorism missions in Afghanistan.
The U.S. general commanding NATO forces in the country said last month
he needed three more brigades -- possibly around 15,000 troops -- on top
of an extra 4,000 soldiers due to arrive in January.
Faced with reluctance of some of its European allies to send more
troops, Washington has asked Japan and NATO countries to help foot the
$17-billion bill to build up the Afghan army.
The Afghan Defense Ministry says the cost of one foreign soldier in
Afghanistan is equal to more than 60 Afghan troops.
Washington's review of its Afghanistan policy has been characterized as
a serious study of current thinking. But U.S. officials concede it will
probably yield only recommendations for the next president -- either
Republican John McCain or Democrat Barack Obama -- who will take office
in January.
War on Taliban cannot be won, says army chief
5. October 2008, 06:34
By Christina Lamb, The Sunday Times (UK)
Britain's most senior military commander in Afghanistan has warned
that the war against the Taliban cannot be won. Brigadier Mark
Carleton-Smith said the British public should not expect a “decisive
military victory” but should be prepared for
a possible deal with the Taliban.
His assessment followed the leaking of a memo from a French diplomat who
claimed that Sir Sherard Cowper-Coles, the British ambassador in Kabul,
had told him the current strategy was “doomed to fail”.
Carleton-Smith, commander of 16 Air Assault Brigade, which has just
completed its second tour of Afghanistan, said it was necessary to
“lower our expectations”. He said: “We’re not going to win this war.
It’s about reducing it to a manageable level of insurgency that’s not a
strategic threat and can be managed by the Afghan army.”
The brigadier added: “We may well leave with there still being a low but
steady ebb of rural insurgency . . . I don’t think we should expect that
when we go there won’t be roaming bands of armed men in this part of the
world. That would be unrealistic and probably incredible.”
Carleton-Smith insisted that his forces had “taken the sting out of the
Taliban for 2008”. But his brigade has sustained heavy losses in the
southern province of Helmand in the past six months, with 32 killed and
170 injured. In an interview with The Sunday Times, he added his voice
to a growing number of people arguing that the conflict in Afghanistan
could be resolved only through a political settlement that could include
the Taliban.
“We want to change the nature of the debate from one where disputes are
settled through the barrel of the gun to one where it is done through
negotiations,” Carleton-Smith said.
“If the Taliban were prepared to sit on the other side of the table and
talk about a political settlement, then that’s precisely the sort of
progress that concludes insurgencies like this. That shouldn’t make
people uncomfortable.”
Last week Gulab Mangal, the governor of Helmand, said the Taliban
controlled more than half the province despite the increased presence of
British forces.
Fair Use
Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the
use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this
constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for
in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
Section 107, the material on this site is
distributed without profit to those
who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information
for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of
your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
copyright owner.
|
|
|