Al-Jazeerah: Cross-Cultural Understanding

www.ccun.org

www.aljazeerah.info

News, July 2008

 

Al-Jazeerah History

Archives 

Mission & Name  

Conflict Terminology  

Editorials

Gaza Holocaust  

Gulf War  

Isdood 

Islam  

News  

News Photos  

Opinion Editorials

US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)  

www.aljazeerah.info

 

 

 

Editorial Note: The following news reports are summaries from original sources. They may also include corrections of Arabic names and political terminology. Comments are in parentheses.

 

Obama Taking the Israeli Extremist Position Saying Jerusalem Will Not Be Capital of the Palestinian State


Obama: Jerusalem will not be capital of Palestinian state,

Date: 24 / 07 / 2008  Time:  09:44
Bethlehem – Ma'an -

US democratic candidate Barak Obama said during a press conference on Wednesday in Sderot, a city in the south of Israel, that he does not support the idea of (the Palestinian city of) East Jerusalem as the capital of a Palestinian state.

Obama made it clear that Jerusalem would remain the capital of Israel and that he would not see the city divided. He added that this position needed to be fixed through negotiations with the Palestinians.

Recent years have seen Obama's position on Israel/Palestine shift dramatically towards the Israeli side. He previously stated that the issue of Jerusalem should be on the table of any peace negotiation, but after criticism of his 'naïve' stance, Obama dropped this position.

The press conference was held with Israeli foreign minister, Tzipi Livni, who said, "Israel and the USA have a common understanding of what must happen in the region."

Earlier Obama met with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas in Ramallah, where he said that he would work hard to continue the peace process.

Obama stressed that if he takes office this fall he will not "start from zero" with the Palestinian peace process. Rather, he said, "we will continue peace process efforts." He also expressed the desire to show Palestinians that there was good reason to hope for a resolution.

Barghouthi: Obama offers hope

Date: 24 / 07 / 2008  Time:  10:54
Ramallah – Ma'an –

Member of the Palestinian Legislative Council, Dr. Mustafa Barghouthi, said on Thursday that U.S. presidential candidate, Barack Obama, offers a greater hope for a favourable resolution of the Palestinian situation than any other candidate.

Barghouthi says he believes that Obama is more sensitive to the needs of the Palestinians and that he will work seriously to end the occupation if he wins the US presidential elections this autumn.

He added that at present it is clear that America cannot act as mediator in the peace process but if Obama wins then it may be possible for the U.S. to act honestly in this role.

His comments come after Obama announced that he will not support the division of Jerusalem. Barghouthi, however, urged the presidential hopeful to never forget that Jerusalem is the capital of Palestine and that it is the most important issue for Palestinians.

Obama, Israel and Palestine By Khalid Amayreh

PIC, [ 23/07/2008 - 11:43 PM ],  occupied East Jerusalem

 

Barack Obama has finally made his long-awaited pilgrimage to Israel, a rite of passage that no aspiring American politician, let alone a presidential candidate,  can afford to miss or  ignore.

There (or rather here),  Obama uttered  all the politically-correct words that Israeli leaders and especially Israel-firsters back home  would want to hear.

He called the creation of Israel in Palestine in 1948 a “miracle,” utterly  ignoring the near obliteration of Palestine  and   expulsion to the four corners of the world of the vast bulk  of its indigenous Christian and Muslim inhabitants.

The presidential hopeful told Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert that “I have come to communicate to you my fervent support for Israel.”

In Sderot, in southern Israel, Obama was quoted as saying the following: “If somebody was sending rockets into my house where my two daughters sleep at night, I would do everything in my power to stop that, and would expect Israelis to do the same thing.”

Of course,  he mentioned absolutely nothing about the Israeli campaign of murder and terror against  Gaza,  particularly the year-long harsh blockade of the coastal enclave’s  estimated 1.5 million inhabitants, which has killed and maimed thousands of innocent men, women and children whose only “crime” is that they had dared elect a government the Bush administration and Israel didn’t  like.

Predictably, Obama lashed out at Iran, saying that “a situation in which Iran was capable of making nuclear weapons would be “game-changing” and would have repercussions across the world.

Again, he utterly and totally ignored Israel’s estimated 300 nuclear warheads, as if  even alluding to this well-known fact was an earth-shaking taboo.

Obama is not ignorant of the facts in the Middle East. He is well-aware of the evil nature of the  Israeli occupation of Palestine and the equally criminal treatment meted out to the Palestinian people.

He also knows well that true and just peace with the Palestinians is the last item on Israel’s agenda as evidenced from the unmitigated Jewish settlement expansion in the West Bank, especially in occupied Arab East Jerusalem.

Non the less, Obama is also meticulously conscious  of the whoring theatre of American politics where political correctness  always exceeds and overrides moral rightness.

He knows that the nearly complete Jewish domination of the “media discourse” in America leaves him with only two choices: Either he be conscientious, in which case he would  most probably lose; or play the political prostitution game quite skillfully, and have a fair chance of winning. Obama has obviously opted to adopt the later choice.

It is of course true that the sole reason behind Obama’s visit to Israel, a country that got the US involved in two wars in the Middle East and is now  hell-bent trying to get  the Bush Administration to wage a third  war, this time  on Iran, has  more to do with his efforts to  impress  American Jewish voters, especially American Zionist leaders, than  with showing solidarity with “Sderot” or underscoring his commitment to peace in the Middle East.

But this is only partially true. There are far more Hispanic voters in the US than Jewish voters, but Obama has made no pilgrimage to Mexico as he has to Israel.

Similarly, there are probably at least as many American  Muslim voters as there are Jewish voters, who unlike the Jews are expected to overwhelmingly vote for Obama, given their conspicuously nightmarish experience with the  Bush administration, especially its witch-hunting campaign against American Muslims.

Yet we have seen Obama display a virtually phobic reaction toward  everything and anything Islamic, from refusing to be photographed with two hejab-wearing supporters recently to him completely disavowing his childhood Islamic heritage as  if the religion of  Islam,  which gave the world so much in terms of  civilization and culture,  were something to be ashamed of.

This probably explains why Obama  has carefully avoided visiting the Haram al Sharif esplanade in East Jerusalem, one of the world’s most splendid sites, lest he be caught inadvertently showing signs of respect to the holy place or shaking hands with a Muslim scholar.

Then his  political opponents back home would rather enthusiastically   seize “the golden opportunity” of having finally found   the ultimate  “proof” that Obama is in fact  a “crypto-follower of Osama bin Laden.”  After all,  Obama’s last name and Osama’s first have 80% similarity.!!!

Well, anything could work in a country that can be so easily   mesmerized by spin doctors and misled to the abyss  by organized mendacity.

Yes, it is the spin doctors, the professional liars, that Obama is worried about, I would say much more than he is about Jewish voters. This is why he probably doesn’t want to give them any chances, even at the expense of whatever moral credentials he might have.

I know that the hardcore Jewish leadership in America doesn’t really  like or trust Obama, mainly because in the tone of his voice they detect a propensity to refuse total submission to Jewish power. This is the reason that their support of the black candidate is shrouded with more than a thin façade of hypocrisy and disingenuousness. 

But why would  the “omnipotent lobby” not  unmask its doubts and lack of certitude about Obama and switch support to Senator McCain, who is with Israel, heart and soul?

Well, because they are worried  that in case Obama won the race,  they lobby would probably fall out of favor  with the  next master of the White House. And that would be very bad for Israel. Hence, their uttered slogan is “we must not allow this Negro to outsmart or outmaneuver us.”

Surely, American Zionism and its powerful lobby, which  effectively controls American politics and policies,  is fond of  Obama’s tongue. But they are not so sure about Obama’s mind and heart.

So, far Obama has done a remarkable job hiding whatever discrepancy there might be  between his tongue and his conscience. This is what irks Israel’s firsters  most.

Well, let us hope that Obama will be the  next President of the United States. At least if he can’t stand up to Israel , whose former Prime Minister Ariel Sharon was rumored to have said “We, the Jews, control America and the Americans know it,” he, at the very least, would  be the lesser of the two evils, since a McCain’s presidency would mean another four years of George W. Bush’s policies.




Fair Use Notice

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

 

 

 

 

Opinions expressed in various sections are the sole responsibility of their authors and they may not represent ccun.org.

editor@ccun.org