Al-Jazeerah: Cross-Cultural Understanding

www.ccun.org

www.aljazeerah.info

News, July 2008

 

Al-Jazeerah History

Archives 

Mission & Name  

Conflict Terminology  

Editorials

Gaza Holocaust  

Gulf War  

Isdood 

Islam  

News  

News Photos  

Opinion Editorials

US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)  

www.aljazeerah.info

 

 

 

Editorial Note: The following news reports are summaries from original sources. They may also include corrections of Arabic names and political terminology. Comments are in parentheses.

 

Sari Nussaibah tells British Prime Minister that EU aid to Palestinians should be cut because it pays cost of the occupation for Israelis

Sari Nussaibah tells British Prime Minister that EU aid to Palestinians should be cut

Date: 22 / 07 / 2008  Time:  17:22
By Marian Houk in Jerusalem

Sari Nussaibah, former Palestinian Authority representative in Jerusalem, and now president of Al-Quds University, said he urged British Prime Minister Gordon Brown in a meeting on Sunday to "think very seriously about stopping aid to the Palestinians."

The suggestion, aimed to shock but nonetheless apparently quite serious, ran at counter-purposes to Brown's visit to the region, which was aimed in part at promoting an "economic road map" to help improve conditions for the Palestinian people living under occupation as a kind of political incentive.

Nussaibah told a group of journalists at a briefing in Jerusalem on Monday that he spoke during a meeting organized the day before by the British Consulate to introduce a few Jerusalem Palestinians to Brown during the British Prime Minister's visit to the region.

The British Prime Minister seemed surprised and taken aback by his suggestion. So, Nussaibah said, he was now bringing his proposal to the media.

"My suggestion is to stop this (the European aid)," Nussaibah said. "The money being donated is just being wasted," he said, "it is just sustaining the occupation."

Nussaibah explained that "The Israelis are happy because they do not have to pay the cost of the occupation. The Europeans are happy because they feel they are doing their part by providing economic assistance … and the Palestinians are happy because we have jobs and we feel free."

But, Nussaibahsaid, "Israel cannot have its cake and eat it, too … Israel cannot continue occupying us and having European Union funds and American dollars."

Nussaibah's remarks echo sentiments expressed privately, and somewhat differently, over at least the past four years by major NGOs and international organizations operating in the occupied Palestinian territory, who complain that what they build with donated funding is many times destroyed in Israeli military and security operations. Then, these humanitarian workers say, the international donors barely make a public protest before simply paying to rebuild again.

Nussaibah also noted that international aid has also contributed to the perception among Palestinians of corruption. "There have been many studies about this happening in Africa and in Asia, and it has happened here, too," Nussaibah said. He said that international aid is actually very dangerous and destabilizing, if not handled extremely carefully.

The large-scale international aid pledged over the years, and most recently at a post-Annapolis Conference donor meeting in Paris last December, was intended to help create an independent Palestinian state, Nussaibah said, but now this does not appear to be on the near horizon.

At the very least, Nussaibah said, the EU should now make continuation of its aid conditional on Israeli seriousness about negotiating peace terms to end the occupation.

Agree first, convince later

Nussaibah also told the journalists that he believes that what should happen now is that Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas and Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert should just go into a room, without their lawyers and advisors, and sign an agreement - any agreement.

"The piece of paper I signed with Ami Ayalon would be one possibility," Nusseibeh suggested, referring to the initiative he and Ayalon, a Labour party MK and former head of the Israeli General Security Services, signed in 2002. "Nobody ever created an Israeli-Palestinian agreement that got as many signatures," Nussaibah added.

Both leaders do have the power to make an agreement, despite their present weakened circumstances, Nussaibah said. Then, Nussaibah said, they can come out and tell their people that they believe it in the best interest of their peoples, and try to convince their respective communities. He added that if Abbas were to do so, he would probably be easily re-elected.

Otherwise, Nussaibah said, the possibility of a two-state solution is rapidly disappearing, "and we should both be looking at a different kind of future." There will soon be no other option, he said, but to work for some kind of coexistence "with the least pain" within one political entity.

There are many reasons why the window of opportunity is closing, Nussaibah said, and a good example is that "Jerusalem has to be shared, but there is an ongoing process to make Jerusalem Israeli unilaterally." He noted that "there is a constant battle here over identity cards," and added that the possibilities for Palestinian housing expansion are very restricted.

Nussaibah added that a two-state solution can be said to be of even greater interest to the Israelis than to the Palestinians because, he said, the Palestinians do not have a project at the moment, while Israel does - the Zionist project that propelled the creation of a Jewish state.

Under relentless Israeli pressure, Nussaibah argued, the Palestinian enthusiasm for a national project in the present circumstances is simply no longer what it was ten, fifteen, or twenty years ago. Palestinians are now "mostly wanting to struggle within the paradigm of South Africa, rather than Algeria," Nussaibah concluded.



Fair Use Notice

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

 

 

 

 

Opinions expressed in various sections are the sole responsibility of their authors and they may not represent ccun.org.

editor@ccun.org