Sari Nussaibah tells British Prime Minister that 
		EU aid to Palestinians should be cut because it pays cost of the 
		occupation for Israelis
		
		Sari Nussaibah tells British Prime Minister that EU aid to 
		Palestinians should be cut
		Date: 22 / 07 / 2008  Time:  17:22 
		By Marian Houk in Jerusalem 
		
		Sari Nussaibah, former Palestinian Authority representative in 
		Jerusalem, and now president of Al-Quds University, said he urged 
		British Prime Minister Gordon Brown in a meeting on Sunday to "think 
		very seriously about stopping aid to the Palestinians."
		
		The suggestion, aimed to shock but nonetheless apparently quite serious, 
		ran at counter-purposes to Brown's visit to the region, which was aimed 
		in part at promoting an "economic road map" to help improve conditions 
		for the Palestinian people living under occupation as a kind of 
		political incentive.
		
		Nussaibah told a group of journalists at a briefing in Jerusalem on 
		Monday that he spoke during a meeting organized the day before by the 
		British Consulate to introduce a few Jerusalem Palestinians to Brown 
		during the British Prime Minister's visit to the region.
		
		The British Prime Minister seemed surprised and taken aback by his 
		suggestion. So, Nussaibah said, he was now bringing his proposal to the 
		media.
		
		"My suggestion is to stop this (the European aid)," Nussaibah said. "The 
		money being donated is just being wasted," he said, "it is just 
		sustaining the occupation."
		
		Nussaibah explained that "The Israelis are happy because they do not 
		have to pay the cost of the occupation. The Europeans are happy because 
		they feel they are doing their part by providing economic assistance … 
		and the Palestinians are happy because we have jobs and we feel free."
		
		But, Nussaibahsaid, "Israel cannot have its cake and eat it, too … 
		Israel cannot continue occupying us and having European Union funds and 
		American dollars." 
		
		Nussaibah's remarks echo sentiments expressed privately, and somewhat 
		differently, over at least the past four years by major NGOs and 
		international organizations operating in the occupied Palestinian 
		territory, who complain that what they build with donated funding is 
		many times destroyed in Israeli military and security operations. Then, 
		these humanitarian workers say, the international donors barely make a 
		public protest before simply paying to rebuild again.
		
		Nussaibah also noted that international aid has also contributed to the 
		perception among Palestinians of corruption. "There have been many 
		studies about this happening in Africa and in Asia, and it has happened 
		here, too," Nussaibah said. He said that international aid is actually 
		very dangerous and destabilizing, if not handled extremely carefully.
		
		The large-scale international aid pledged over the years, and most 
		recently at a post-Annapolis Conference donor meeting in Paris last 
		December, was intended to help create an independent Palestinian state, 
		Nussaibah said, but now this does not appear to be on the near horizon.
		
		At the very least, Nussaibah said, the EU should now make continuation 
		of its aid conditional on Israeli seriousness about negotiating peace 
		terms to end the occupation.
		
		Agree first, convince later
		
		Nussaibah also told the journalists that he believes that what should 
		happen now is that Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas and Israeli Prime 
		Minister Ehud Olmert should just go into a room, without their lawyers 
		and advisors, and sign an agreement - any agreement. 
		
		"The piece of paper I signed with Ami Ayalon would be one possibility," 
		Nusseibeh suggested, referring to the initiative he and Ayalon, a Labour 
		party MK and former head of the Israeli General Security Services, 
		signed in 2002. "Nobody ever created an Israeli-Palestinian agreement 
		that got as many signatures," Nussaibah added.
		
		Both leaders do have the power to make an agreement, despite their 
		present weakened circumstances, Nussaibah said. Then, Nussaibah said, 
		they can come out and tell their people that they believe it in the best 
		interest of their peoples, and try to convince their respective 
		communities. He added that if Abbas were to do so, he would probably be 
		easily re-elected.
		
		Otherwise, Nussaibah said, the possibility of a two-state solution is 
		rapidly disappearing, "and we should both be looking at a different kind 
		of future." There will soon be no other option, he said, but to work for 
		some kind of coexistence "with the least pain" within one political 
		entity. 
		
		There are many reasons why the window of opportunity is closing, 
		Nussaibah said, and a good example is that "Jerusalem has to be shared, 
		but there is an ongoing process to make Jerusalem Israeli unilaterally." 
		He noted that "there is a constant battle here over identity cards," and 
		added that the possibilities for Palestinian housing expansion are very 
		restricted. 
		
		Nussaibah added that a two-state solution can be said to be of even 
		greater interest to the Israelis than to the Palestinians because, he 
		said, the Palestinians do not have a project at the moment, while Israel 
		does - the Zionist project that propelled the creation of a Jewish 
		state. 
		
		Under relentless Israeli pressure, Nussaibah argued, the Palestinian 
		enthusiasm for a national project in the present circumstances is simply 
		no longer what it was ten, fifteen, or twenty years ago. Palestinians 
		are now "mostly wanting to struggle within the paradigm of South Africa, 
		rather than Algeria," Nussaibah concluded.
		
		
      
      
      Fair Use
      Notice
      This site contains copyrighted material the
      use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright
      owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance
      understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
      democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this
      constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for
      in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
      Section 107, the material on this site is
      distributed without profit to those
      who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information
      for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
      If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of
      your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
      copyright owner.