NATO soldier killed in Afghanistan attack, Karzai
Laments Coalition Use of Thugs
NATO soldier killed in Afghanistan attack
Wed Dec 24, 8:06 am ET
AFP –
KABUL (AFP) –
A soldier with the NATO-led force in Afghanistan was killed Wednesday
in a Taliban attack in the east of the country, the force said.
The multinational International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) did
not provide the nationality of the soldier killed or any details about
the attack.
About 70,000 international soldiers are currently deployed in
Afghanistan, most of them operating under NATO command.
Most of the soldiers have been killed in war attacks but the tally,
compiled by the
icasualties.org website that tracks casualties in Afghanistan and
Iraq, includes those who die in accidents and from natural causes.
Afghanistan's President Karzai laments coalition use of
'thugs'
Syed Jan / European Pressphoto Agency
Afghan President Hamid Karzai wants a proper police force, not
militias. The leader of Afghanistan faults U.S.-led forces, saying they
have hired warlords who have then been sent to mistreat ordinary
Afghans. By Kim Barker
6:04 PM PST, December 22, 2008 Reporting from
Kabul, Afghanistan -- Afghan President Hamid Karzai sat down to talk
with Chicago Tribune correspondent Kim Barker in Kabul last week. Karzai
reacted to criticisms by Barack Obama made while still a candidate for
the U.S. presidency, criticized in turn American-led military operations
in his country and called for focusing the fight against terrorism more
on neighboring Pakistan than Afghanistan. Excerpts from the interview
follow.
What do you think about being described [by
then-presidential candidate Obama] as weak and spending too much time in
a bunker?
Bunker? We are in a trench, and our allies are with us
in the trench. We were on a high hill with a glorious success in 2002
[after ousting the Taliban regime following the Sept. 11 attacks in the
U.S.], backed fully by the Afghan people. . . . And the Taliban and the
Al Qaeda were defeated, without a fight, especially in southern parts of
Afghanistan. . . . We must now look back and find out as to why are we
in a trench, or if you'd like to describe it, as a bunker. Why are we in
a bunker? Thousands of the Taliban went back to their homes. They began
a normal life. The coalition forces began to employ thugs, and went with
those thugs to the homes of hundreds of elders and community people,
frightened them into running away from Afghanistan. I'm surprised that
the Afghan people still have so much trust in what we are doing. I'm
surprised that people, after having been bombed many, many times over,
with their children and families killed, torn to pieces, still come to
me as their president. . . . And we can be easily out of the bunker, or
as I describe it, the trench, if we begin to correct our behavior. The
international community should correct their behavior, and the Afghan
government should begin to be helped to do more. . . . For years we've
been saying that we need concentration on the [insurgents'] sanctuaries.
We were ignored. For years I've been saying that the war on terrorism is
not in Afghanistan, that it's in the training camps, it's in sanctuaries
[in Pakistan]. Rather than going there, the coalition went around the
Afghan villages, burst into people's homes and . . . [has been]
committing extrajudicial killings in our country. The latest example was
the day before yesterday in Khowst, where a man, a woman and a
12-year-old boy were killed. Were they Al Qaeda? And even if they were,
was there a court order to shoot them down in their homes? And if they
were, was the 12-year-old boy Al Qaeda too? Or the woman? And if this
behavior continues, we will be in a deeper trench than we are in today.
And the war against terrorism will end in a disgraceful defeat.
What do you mean, the coalition hired thugs?
They hired [Afghan]
thugs . . . thugs or warlords or whatever. They created militias of
those people who had no limits to misbehavior and who were sent to
people's homes to search their homes, to arrest them and to intimidate
them. And we've been trying to tell them for seven years now that that
is wrong. We've tried to control it. There has been some improvement,
but still it continues to happen. . . . This has to stop if you want to
succeed. Only then we can begin to build the Afghan government. If they
go to the Afghan homes and burst in and arrest or kill, does that leave
the Afghan people with the feeling that they have a government? No. That
is actually the destruction of the Afghan government. If Afghanistan is
a sovereign country, if Afghanistan has an elected government, if
Afghanistan has a constitution, if Afghanistan has laws, and if there is
the slogan of strengthening the Afghan democracy and institutions, then
the Afghan sovereignty and the Afghan laws must be respected, and not
violated in such an extreme manner as it is being done today. Therefore
my plea to the international community and to the American government is
-- and I will do this with them, we have already sent them some
documents and reports on this -- that we want to sit down and redraw the
map of relationship in which we take responsibility for what's gone
wrong in my government, whether it's corruption, whether it's narcotics,
whether it's inefficiency . . . but we are committed to improving, as we
have improved already, and I would like the international community also
to commit strongly to respecting the Afghan sovereignty and Afghan laws
in conducting the war on terrorism with the right tools and the right
attitude.
But the West is now talking about doing some sort of
Awakenings movement [the mainly Sunni Arab fighters in Iraq who now
serve the government] in Afghanistan, which would do precisely what
you're talking about -- empower these tribal groups.
That's
wrong. If we create militias again, we will be ruining this country
further. That's not what I want. I have been talking for a long time
first of all about raising a proper police force. For a long time now,
which didn't happen, which is only beginning to happen. And then I was
talking for a long time about regaining the trust of the communities,
meaning, in the first stage, to stop harassing them, to stop bursting
into their homes, to stop arresting them at will and to stop bombing
villages. Once that happens, then we begin the recovery process of
getting in contact with them, bringing back and giving them the trust
that they need and enlisting them to cooperate, as they did in 2002. The
Taliban were defeated with the help of the very people who are now under
attack by the coalition forces. And this attack must stop.